Cargando…
Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice?
BACKGROUND: A perennial challenge of primary care quality improvement is to establish why interventions work in some circumstances, but not others. This study aimed to identify factors explaining variations in the impact on clinical practice of a facilitation led vascular health intervention in Aust...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0995-7 |
_version_ | 1783442836701577216 |
---|---|
author | Russell, Grant Lane, Riki Parker, Sharon Litt, John Mazza, Danielle Lloyd, Jane Zwar, Nicholas van Driel, Mieke Del Mar, Chris Smith, Jane Harris, Mark F. |
author_facet | Russell, Grant Lane, Riki Parker, Sharon Litt, John Mazza, Danielle Lloyd, Jane Zwar, Nicholas van Driel, Mieke Del Mar, Chris Smith, Jane Harris, Mark F. |
author_sort | Russell, Grant |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A perennial challenge of primary care quality improvement is to establish why interventions work in some circumstances, but not others. This study aimed to identify factors explaining variations in the impact on clinical practice of a facilitation led vascular health intervention in Australian family practice. METHODS: Our mixed methods study was embedded within a cluster randomised controlled trial of a facilitation intervention designed to increase the uptake of evidence-based prevention of vascular disease in family practices. The study was set in four Australian states using eight of the study’s 16 intervention practices. Facilitators worked with intervention practices to develop and implement improvements in preventive care informed by a vascular risk factor audit. We constructed case studies of each practice’s “intervention narrative” from semi-structured interviews with clinicians, facilitators and other staff, practice observation, and document analysis of facilitator diaries. The intervention narratives were combined with pre- and post-intervention audit data to generate typologies of practice responses to the intervention. RESULTS: We found substantial variability between practices in the changes made to vascular risk recording. Context (i.e. practice size), adaptive reserve (i.e. interpersonal relationships, manager and nurse involvement), and occasional data idiosyncrasies interacted to influence this variability. CONCLUSION: The findings emphasise the importance of tailoring facilitation interventions to practice size, clinician engagement and, critically, the organisation of, and relationships between, the members of the practice team. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12612000578808 (29/5/2012). This trial registration is retrospective as our first patient returned their consent on the 21/5/2012. Patient recruitment was ongoing until 31/10/2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0995-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6688202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66882022019-08-14 Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? Russell, Grant Lane, Riki Parker, Sharon Litt, John Mazza, Danielle Lloyd, Jane Zwar, Nicholas van Driel, Mieke Del Mar, Chris Smith, Jane Harris, Mark F. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: A perennial challenge of primary care quality improvement is to establish why interventions work in some circumstances, but not others. This study aimed to identify factors explaining variations in the impact on clinical practice of a facilitation led vascular health intervention in Australian family practice. METHODS: Our mixed methods study was embedded within a cluster randomised controlled trial of a facilitation intervention designed to increase the uptake of evidence-based prevention of vascular disease in family practices. The study was set in four Australian states using eight of the study’s 16 intervention practices. Facilitators worked with intervention practices to develop and implement improvements in preventive care informed by a vascular risk factor audit. We constructed case studies of each practice’s “intervention narrative” from semi-structured interviews with clinicians, facilitators and other staff, practice observation, and document analysis of facilitator diaries. The intervention narratives were combined with pre- and post-intervention audit data to generate typologies of practice responses to the intervention. RESULTS: We found substantial variability between practices in the changes made to vascular risk recording. Context (i.e. practice size), adaptive reserve (i.e. interpersonal relationships, manager and nurse involvement), and occasional data idiosyncrasies interacted to influence this variability. CONCLUSION: The findings emphasise the importance of tailoring facilitation interventions to practice size, clinician engagement and, critically, the organisation of, and relationships between, the members of the practice team. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12612000578808 (29/5/2012). This trial registration is retrospective as our first patient returned their consent on the 21/5/2012. Patient recruitment was ongoing until 31/10/2012. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-019-0995-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6688202/ /pubmed/31395020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0995-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Russell, Grant Lane, Riki Parker, Sharon Litt, John Mazza, Danielle Lloyd, Jane Zwar, Nicholas van Driel, Mieke Del Mar, Chris Smith, Jane Harris, Mark F. Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? |
title | Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? |
title_full | Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? |
title_fullStr | Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? |
title_full_unstemmed | Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? |
title_short | Preventive Evidence into Practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? |
title_sort | preventive evidence into practice: what factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0995-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russellgrant preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT laneriki preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT parkersharon preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT littjohn preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT mazzadanielle preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT lloydjane preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT zwarnicholas preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT vandrielmieke preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT delmarchris preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT smithjane preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT harrismarkf preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice AT preventiveevidenceintopracticewhatfactorsmatterinafacilitationinterventiontopreventvasculardiseaseinfamilypractice |