Cargando…

Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review

BACKGROUND: As many as 90% of patients develop anemia by their third day in an intensive care unit (ICU). We evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on the volume of blood lost, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and incidence of anemia. METHODS: We conducted a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehead, Nedra S., Williams, Laurina O., Meleth, Sreelatha, Kennedy, Sara M., Ubaka-Blackmoore, Nneka, Geaghan, Sharon M., Nichols, James H., Carroll, Patrick, McEvoy, Michael T., Gayken, Julie, Ernst, Dennis J., Litwin, Christine, Epner, Paul, Taylor, Jennifer, Graber, Mark L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9
_version_ 1783442841225134080
author Whitehead, Nedra S.
Williams, Laurina O.
Meleth, Sreelatha
Kennedy, Sara M.
Ubaka-Blackmoore, Nneka
Geaghan, Sharon M.
Nichols, James H.
Carroll, Patrick
McEvoy, Michael T.
Gayken, Julie
Ernst, Dennis J.
Litwin, Christine
Epner, Paul
Taylor, Jennifer
Graber, Mark L.
author_facet Whitehead, Nedra S.
Williams, Laurina O.
Meleth, Sreelatha
Kennedy, Sara M.
Ubaka-Blackmoore, Nneka
Geaghan, Sharon M.
Nichols, James H.
Carroll, Patrick
McEvoy, Michael T.
Gayken, Julie
Ernst, Dennis J.
Litwin, Christine
Epner, Paul
Taylor, Jennifer
Graber, Mark L.
author_sort Whitehead, Nedra S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As many as 90% of patients develop anemia by their third day in an intensive care unit (ICU). We evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on the volume of blood lost, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and incidence of anemia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) systematic review methods for rating study quality and assessing the body of evidence. Searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsychINFO, and CINAHL identified 2564 published references. We included studies of the impact of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on blood loss, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, or anemia among hospital inpatients. We excluded studies not published in English and studies that did not have a comparison group, did not report an outcome of interest, or were rated as poor quality. Twenty-one studies met these criteria. We conducted a meta-analysis if > 2 homogenous studies reported sufficient information for analysis. RESULTS: We found moderate, consistent evidence that devices that return blood from flushing venous or arterial lines to the patient reduced blood loss by approximately 25% in both neonatal ICU (NICU) and adult ICU patients [pooled estimate in adults, 24.7 (95% CI = 12.1–37.3)]. Bundled interventions that included blood conservation devices appeared to reduce blood loss by at least 25% (suggestive evidence). The evidence was insufficient to determine if these devices reduced hemoglobin decline or risk of anemia. The evidence suggested that small volume tubes reduced the risk of anemia, but was insufficient to determine if they affected the volume of blood loss or the rate of hemoglobin decline. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate, consistent evidence indicated that devices that return blood from testing or flushing lines to the patient reduce the volume of blood loss by approximately 25% among ICU patients. The results of this systematic review support the use of blood conservation systems with arterial or venous catheters to eliminate blood waste when drawing blood for testing. The evidence was insufficient to conclude the devices impacted hemoglobin levels or transfusion rates. The use of small volume tubes may reduce the risk of anemia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66882222019-08-14 Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review Whitehead, Nedra S. Williams, Laurina O. Meleth, Sreelatha Kennedy, Sara M. Ubaka-Blackmoore, Nneka Geaghan, Sharon M. Nichols, James H. Carroll, Patrick McEvoy, Michael T. Gayken, Julie Ernst, Dennis J. Litwin, Christine Epner, Paul Taylor, Jennifer Graber, Mark L. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: As many as 90% of patients develop anemia by their third day in an intensive care unit (ICU). We evaluated the efficacy of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on the volume of blood lost, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, and incidence of anemia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) systematic review methods for rating study quality and assessing the body of evidence. Searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsychINFO, and CINAHL identified 2564 published references. We included studies of the impact of interventions to reduce phlebotomy-related blood loss on blood loss, hemoglobin levels, transfusions, or anemia among hospital inpatients. We excluded studies not published in English and studies that did not have a comparison group, did not report an outcome of interest, or were rated as poor quality. Twenty-one studies met these criteria. We conducted a meta-analysis if > 2 homogenous studies reported sufficient information for analysis. RESULTS: We found moderate, consistent evidence that devices that return blood from flushing venous or arterial lines to the patient reduced blood loss by approximately 25% in both neonatal ICU (NICU) and adult ICU patients [pooled estimate in adults, 24.7 (95% CI = 12.1–37.3)]. Bundled interventions that included blood conservation devices appeared to reduce blood loss by at least 25% (suggestive evidence). The evidence was insufficient to determine if these devices reduced hemoglobin decline or risk of anemia. The evidence suggested that small volume tubes reduced the risk of anemia, but was insufficient to determine if they affected the volume of blood loss or the rate of hemoglobin decline. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate, consistent evidence indicated that devices that return blood from testing or flushing lines to the patient reduce the volume of blood loss by approximately 25% among ICU patients. The results of this systematic review support the use of blood conservation systems with arterial or venous catheters to eliminate blood waste when drawing blood for testing. The evidence was insufficient to conclude the devices impacted hemoglobin levels or transfusion rates. The use of small volume tubes may reduce the risk of anemia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6688222/ /pubmed/31399052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Whitehead, Nedra S.
Williams, Laurina O.
Meleth, Sreelatha
Kennedy, Sara M.
Ubaka-Blackmoore, Nneka
Geaghan, Sharon M.
Nichols, James H.
Carroll, Patrick
McEvoy, Michael T.
Gayken, Julie
Ernst, Dennis J.
Litwin, Christine
Epner, Paul
Taylor, Jennifer
Graber, Mark L.
Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review
title Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review
title_full Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review
title_short Interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review
title_sort interventions to prevent iatrogenic anemia: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2511-9
work_keys_str_mv AT whiteheadnedras interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT williamslaurinao interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT melethsreelatha interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT kennedysaram interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT ubakablackmoorenneka interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT geaghansharonm interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT nicholsjamesh interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT carrollpatrick interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT mcevoymichaelt interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT gaykenjulie interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT ernstdennisj interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT litwinchristine interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT epnerpaul interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT taylorjennifer interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview
AT grabermarkl interventionstopreventiatrogenicanemiaalaboratorymedicinebestpracticessystematicreview