Cargando…

An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders

BACKGROUND: Recently an increasing number of digital tools to aid clinical work have been published. This study’s aim was to create an algorithm which can assist physicians as a “digital expert” with the differential diagnosis of central ocular motor disorders, in particular in rare diseases. RESULT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraus, Ludwig, Kremmyda, Olympia, Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana, Barceló, Sebastià, Feil, Katharina, Strupp, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8
_version_ 1783442878271324160
author Kraus, Ludwig
Kremmyda, Olympia
Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana
Barceló, Sebastià
Feil, Katharina
Strupp, Michael
author_facet Kraus, Ludwig
Kremmyda, Olympia
Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana
Barceló, Sebastià
Feil, Katharina
Strupp, Michael
author_sort Kraus, Ludwig
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently an increasing number of digital tools to aid clinical work have been published. This study’s aim was to create an algorithm which can assist physicians as a “digital expert” with the differential diagnosis of central ocular motor disorders, in particular in rare diseases. RESULTS: The algorithm’s input consists of a maximum of 60 neurological and oculomotor signs and symptoms. The output is a list of the most probable diagnoses out of 14 alternatives and the most likely topographical anatomical localizations out of eight alternatives. Positive points are given for disease-associated symptoms, negative points for symptoms unlikely to occur with a disease. The accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated using the two diagnoses and two brain zones with the highest scores. In a first step, a dataset of 102 patients (56 males, 48.0 ± 22 yrs) with various central ocular motor disorders and underlying diseases, with a particular focus on rare diseases, was used as the basis for developing the algorithm iteratively. In a second step, the algorithm was validated with a dataset of 104 patients (59 males, 46.0 ± 23 yrs). For 12/14 diseases, the algorithm showed a sensitivity of between 80 and 100% and the specificity of 9/14 diseases was between 82 and 95% (e.g., 100% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity for Niemann Pick type C, and 80% specificity and 91.5% sensitivity for Gaucher’s disease). In terms of a topographic anatomical diagnosis, the sensitivity was between 77 and 100% for 4/8 brain zones, and the specificity of 5/8 zones ranged between 79 and 99%. CONCLUSION: This algorithm using our knowledge of the functional anatomy of the ocular motor system and possible underlying diseases is a useful tool, in particular for the diagnosis of rare diseases associated with typical central ocular motor disorders, which are often overlooked. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66883792019-08-14 An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders Kraus, Ludwig Kremmyda, Olympia Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana Barceló, Sebastià Feil, Katharina Strupp, Michael Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Recently an increasing number of digital tools to aid clinical work have been published. This study’s aim was to create an algorithm which can assist physicians as a “digital expert” with the differential diagnosis of central ocular motor disorders, in particular in rare diseases. RESULTS: The algorithm’s input consists of a maximum of 60 neurological and oculomotor signs and symptoms. The output is a list of the most probable diagnoses out of 14 alternatives and the most likely topographical anatomical localizations out of eight alternatives. Positive points are given for disease-associated symptoms, negative points for symptoms unlikely to occur with a disease. The accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated using the two diagnoses and two brain zones with the highest scores. In a first step, a dataset of 102 patients (56 males, 48.0 ± 22 yrs) with various central ocular motor disorders and underlying diseases, with a particular focus on rare diseases, was used as the basis for developing the algorithm iteratively. In a second step, the algorithm was validated with a dataset of 104 patients (59 males, 46.0 ± 23 yrs). For 12/14 diseases, the algorithm showed a sensitivity of between 80 and 100% and the specificity of 9/14 diseases was between 82 and 95% (e.g., 100% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity for Niemann Pick type C, and 80% specificity and 91.5% sensitivity for Gaucher’s disease). In terms of a topographic anatomical diagnosis, the sensitivity was between 77 and 100% for 4/8 brain zones, and the specificity of 5/8 zones ranged between 79 and 99%. CONCLUSION: This algorithm using our knowledge of the functional anatomy of the ocular motor system and possible underlying diseases is a useful tool, in particular for the diagnosis of rare diseases associated with typical central ocular motor disorders, which are often overlooked. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6688379/ /pubmed/31395076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kraus, Ludwig
Kremmyda, Olympia
Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana
Barceló, Sebastià
Feil, Katharina
Strupp, Michael
An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
title An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
title_full An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
title_fullStr An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
title_full_unstemmed An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
title_short An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
title_sort algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8
work_keys_str_mv AT krausludwig analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT kremmydaolympia analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT bremovaertltatiana analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT barcelosebastia analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT feilkatharina analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT struppmichael analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT krausludwig algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT kremmydaolympia algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT bremovaertltatiana algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT barcelosebastia algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT feilkatharina algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders
AT struppmichael algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders