Cargando…
An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders
BACKGROUND: Recently an increasing number of digital tools to aid clinical work have been published. This study’s aim was to create an algorithm which can assist physicians as a “digital expert” with the differential diagnosis of central ocular motor disorders, in particular in rare diseases. RESULT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8 |
_version_ | 1783442878271324160 |
---|---|
author | Kraus, Ludwig Kremmyda, Olympia Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana Barceló, Sebastià Feil, Katharina Strupp, Michael |
author_facet | Kraus, Ludwig Kremmyda, Olympia Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana Barceló, Sebastià Feil, Katharina Strupp, Michael |
author_sort | Kraus, Ludwig |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently an increasing number of digital tools to aid clinical work have been published. This study’s aim was to create an algorithm which can assist physicians as a “digital expert” with the differential diagnosis of central ocular motor disorders, in particular in rare diseases. RESULTS: The algorithm’s input consists of a maximum of 60 neurological and oculomotor signs and symptoms. The output is a list of the most probable diagnoses out of 14 alternatives and the most likely topographical anatomical localizations out of eight alternatives. Positive points are given for disease-associated symptoms, negative points for symptoms unlikely to occur with a disease. The accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated using the two diagnoses and two brain zones with the highest scores. In a first step, a dataset of 102 patients (56 males, 48.0 ± 22 yrs) with various central ocular motor disorders and underlying diseases, with a particular focus on rare diseases, was used as the basis for developing the algorithm iteratively. In a second step, the algorithm was validated with a dataset of 104 patients (59 males, 46.0 ± 23 yrs). For 12/14 diseases, the algorithm showed a sensitivity of between 80 and 100% and the specificity of 9/14 diseases was between 82 and 95% (e.g., 100% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity for Niemann Pick type C, and 80% specificity and 91.5% sensitivity for Gaucher’s disease). In terms of a topographic anatomical diagnosis, the sensitivity was between 77 and 100% for 4/8 brain zones, and the specificity of 5/8 zones ranged between 79 and 99%. CONCLUSION: This algorithm using our knowledge of the functional anatomy of the ocular motor system and possible underlying diseases is a useful tool, in particular for the diagnosis of rare diseases associated with typical central ocular motor disorders, which are often overlooked. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6688379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66883792019-08-14 An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders Kraus, Ludwig Kremmyda, Olympia Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana Barceló, Sebastià Feil, Katharina Strupp, Michael Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Recently an increasing number of digital tools to aid clinical work have been published. This study’s aim was to create an algorithm which can assist physicians as a “digital expert” with the differential diagnosis of central ocular motor disorders, in particular in rare diseases. RESULTS: The algorithm’s input consists of a maximum of 60 neurological and oculomotor signs and symptoms. The output is a list of the most probable diagnoses out of 14 alternatives and the most likely topographical anatomical localizations out of eight alternatives. Positive points are given for disease-associated symptoms, negative points for symptoms unlikely to occur with a disease. The accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated using the two diagnoses and two brain zones with the highest scores. In a first step, a dataset of 102 patients (56 males, 48.0 ± 22 yrs) with various central ocular motor disorders and underlying diseases, with a particular focus on rare diseases, was used as the basis for developing the algorithm iteratively. In a second step, the algorithm was validated with a dataset of 104 patients (59 males, 46.0 ± 23 yrs). For 12/14 diseases, the algorithm showed a sensitivity of between 80 and 100% and the specificity of 9/14 diseases was between 82 and 95% (e.g., 100% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity for Niemann Pick type C, and 80% specificity and 91.5% sensitivity for Gaucher’s disease). In terms of a topographic anatomical diagnosis, the sensitivity was between 77 and 100% for 4/8 brain zones, and the specificity of 5/8 zones ranged between 79 and 99%. CONCLUSION: This algorithm using our knowledge of the functional anatomy of the ocular motor system and possible underlying diseases is a useful tool, in particular for the diagnosis of rare diseases associated with typical central ocular motor disorders, which are often overlooked. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6688379/ /pubmed/31395076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kraus, Ludwig Kremmyda, Olympia Bremova-Ertl, Tatiana Barceló, Sebastià Feil, Katharina Strupp, Michael An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders |
title | An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders |
title_full | An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders |
title_fullStr | An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders |
title_short | An algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders |
title_sort | algorithm as a diagnostic tool for central ocular motor disorders, also to diagnose rare disorders |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1164-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krausludwig analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT kremmydaolympia analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT bremovaertltatiana analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT barcelosebastia analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT feilkatharina analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT struppmichael analgorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT krausludwig algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT kremmydaolympia algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT bremovaertltatiana algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT barcelosebastia algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT feilkatharina algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders AT struppmichael algorithmasadiagnostictoolforcentralocularmotordisordersalsotodiagnoseraredisorders |