Cargando…

Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has become a vital part of medical imaging research. ML methods have evolved over the years from manual seeded inputs to automatic initializations. The advancements in the field of ML have led to more intelligent and self-reliant computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gardezi, Syed Jamal Safdar, Elazab, Ahmed, Lei, Baiying, Wang, Tianfu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350843
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14464
_version_ 1783442890061512704
author Gardezi, Syed Jamal Safdar
Elazab, Ahmed
Lei, Baiying
Wang, Tianfu
author_facet Gardezi, Syed Jamal Safdar
Elazab, Ahmed
Lei, Baiying
Wang, Tianfu
author_sort Gardezi, Syed Jamal Safdar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has become a vital part of medical imaging research. ML methods have evolved over the years from manual seeded inputs to automatic initializations. The advancements in the field of ML have led to more intelligent and self-reliant computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, as the learning ability of ML methods has been constantly improving. More and more automated methods are emerging with deep feature learning and representations. Recent advancements of ML with deeper and extensive representation approaches, commonly known as deep learning (DL) approaches, have made a very significant impact on improving the diagnostics capabilities of the CAD systems. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to survey both traditional ML and DL literature with particular application for breast cancer diagnosis. The review also provided a brief insight into some well-known DL networks. METHODS: In this paper, we present an overview of ML and DL techniques with particular application for breast cancer. Specifically, we search the PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Web of Science databases and retrieve the studies in DL for the past 5 years that have used multiview mammogram datasets. RESULTS: The analysis of traditional ML reveals the limited usage of the methods, whereas the DL methods have great potential for implementation in clinical analysis and improve the diagnostic capability of existing CAD systems. CONCLUSIONS: From the literature, it can be found that heterogeneous breast densities make masses more challenging to detect and classify compared with calcifications. The traditional ML methods present confined approaches limited to either particular density type or datasets. Although the DL methods show promising improvements in breast cancer diagnosis, there are still issues of data scarcity and computational cost, which have been overcome to a significant extent by applying data augmentation and improved computational power of DL algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66884372019-08-20 Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review Gardezi, Syed Jamal Safdar Elazab, Ahmed Lei, Baiying Wang, Tianfu J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has become a vital part of medical imaging research. ML methods have evolved over the years from manual seeded inputs to automatic initializations. The advancements in the field of ML have led to more intelligent and self-reliant computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, as the learning ability of ML methods has been constantly improving. More and more automated methods are emerging with deep feature learning and representations. Recent advancements of ML with deeper and extensive representation approaches, commonly known as deep learning (DL) approaches, have made a very significant impact on improving the diagnostics capabilities of the CAD systems. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to survey both traditional ML and DL literature with particular application for breast cancer diagnosis. The review also provided a brief insight into some well-known DL networks. METHODS: In this paper, we present an overview of ML and DL techniques with particular application for breast cancer. Specifically, we search the PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Web of Science databases and retrieve the studies in DL for the past 5 years that have used multiview mammogram datasets. RESULTS: The analysis of traditional ML reveals the limited usage of the methods, whereas the DL methods have great potential for implementation in clinical analysis and improve the diagnostic capability of existing CAD systems. CONCLUSIONS: From the literature, it can be found that heterogeneous breast densities make masses more challenging to detect and classify compared with calcifications. The traditional ML methods present confined approaches limited to either particular density type or datasets. Although the DL methods show promising improvements in breast cancer diagnosis, there are still issues of data scarcity and computational cost, which have been overcome to a significant extent by applying data augmentation and improved computational power of DL algorithms. JMIR Publications 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6688437/ /pubmed/31350843 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14464 Text en ©Syed Jamal Safdar Gardezi, Ahmed Elazab, Baiying Lei, Tianfu Wang. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 26.07.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Gardezi, Syed Jamal Safdar
Elazab, Ahmed
Lei, Baiying
Wang, Tianfu
Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
title Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
title_full Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
title_short Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
title_sort breast cancer detection and diagnosis using mammographic data: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350843
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14464
work_keys_str_mv AT gardezisyedjamalsafdar breastcancerdetectionanddiagnosisusingmammographicdatasystematicreview
AT elazabahmed breastcancerdetectionanddiagnosisusingmammographicdatasystematicreview
AT leibaiying breastcancerdetectionanddiagnosisusingmammographicdatasystematicreview
AT wangtianfu breastcancerdetectionanddiagnosisusingmammographicdatasystematicreview