Cargando…
Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
BACKGROUND: In most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), routine mental health information is unavailable or unreliable, making monitoring of mental healthcare coverage difficult. This study aims to evaluate a new set of mental health indicators introduced in primary healthcare settings in five...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.22 |
_version_ | 1783442894145716224 |
---|---|
author | Jordans, Mark Chisholm, Dan Semrau, Maya Gurung, Dristy Abdulmalik, Jibril Ahuja, Shalini Mugisha, James Mntambo, Ntokozo Kigozi, Fred Petersen, Inge Shidhaye, Rahul Upadhaya, Nawaraj Lund, Crick Thornicroft, Graham Gureje, Oye |
author_facet | Jordans, Mark Chisholm, Dan Semrau, Maya Gurung, Dristy Abdulmalik, Jibril Ahuja, Shalini Mugisha, James Mntambo, Ntokozo Kigozi, Fred Petersen, Inge Shidhaye, Rahul Upadhaya, Nawaraj Lund, Crick Thornicroft, Graham Gureje, Oye |
author_sort | Jordans, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), routine mental health information is unavailable or unreliable, making monitoring of mental healthcare coverage difficult. This study aims to evaluate a new set of mental health indicators introduced in primary healthcare settings in five LMIC. METHOD: A survey was conducted among primary healthcare workers (n = 272) to assess the acceptability and feasibility of eight new indicators monitoring mental healthcare needs, utilisation, quality and payments. Also, primary health facility case records (n = 583) were reviewed by trained research assistants to assess the level of completion (yes/no) for each of the indicators and subsequently the level of correctness of completion (correct/incorrect – with incorrect defined as illogical, missing or illegible information) of the indicators used by health workers. Assessments were conducted within 1 month of the introduction of the indicators, as well as 6–9 months afterwards. RESULTS: Across both time points and across all indicators, 78% of the measurements of indicators were complete. Among the best performing indicators (diagnosis, severity and treatment), this was significantly higher. With regards to correctness, 87% of all completed indicators were correctly completed. There was a trend towards improvement over time. Health workers' perceptions on feasibility and utility, across sites and over time, indicated a positive attitude in 81% of all measurements. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates high levels of performance and perceived utility for a set of indicators that could ultimately be used to monitor coverage of mental healthcare in primary healthcare settings in LMIC. We recommend that these indicators are incorporated into existing health information systems and adopted within the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Programme implementation strategy. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6688458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66884582019-08-23 Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries Jordans, Mark Chisholm, Dan Semrau, Maya Gurung, Dristy Abdulmalik, Jibril Ahuja, Shalini Mugisha, James Mntambo, Ntokozo Kigozi, Fred Petersen, Inge Shidhaye, Rahul Upadhaya, Nawaraj Lund, Crick Thornicroft, Graham Gureje, Oye BJPsych Open Emerald Series BACKGROUND: In most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), routine mental health information is unavailable or unreliable, making monitoring of mental healthcare coverage difficult. This study aims to evaluate a new set of mental health indicators introduced in primary healthcare settings in five LMIC. METHOD: A survey was conducted among primary healthcare workers (n = 272) to assess the acceptability and feasibility of eight new indicators monitoring mental healthcare needs, utilisation, quality and payments. Also, primary health facility case records (n = 583) were reviewed by trained research assistants to assess the level of completion (yes/no) for each of the indicators and subsequently the level of correctness of completion (correct/incorrect – with incorrect defined as illogical, missing or illegible information) of the indicators used by health workers. Assessments were conducted within 1 month of the introduction of the indicators, as well as 6–9 months afterwards. RESULTS: Across both time points and across all indicators, 78% of the measurements of indicators were complete. Among the best performing indicators (diagnosis, severity and treatment), this was significantly higher. With regards to correctness, 87% of all completed indicators were correctly completed. There was a trend towards improvement over time. Health workers' perceptions on feasibility and utility, across sites and over time, indicated a positive attitude in 81% of all measurements. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates high levels of performance and perceived utility for a set of indicators that could ultimately be used to monitor coverage of mental healthcare in primary healthcare settings in LMIC. We recommend that these indicators are incorporated into existing health information systems and adopted within the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Programme implementation strategy. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. Cambridge University Press 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6688458/ /pubmed/31530320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.22 Text en © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Emerald Series Jordans, Mark Chisholm, Dan Semrau, Maya Gurung, Dristy Abdulmalik, Jibril Ahuja, Shalini Mugisha, James Mntambo, Ntokozo Kigozi, Fred Petersen, Inge Shidhaye, Rahul Upadhaya, Nawaraj Lund, Crick Thornicroft, Graham Gureje, Oye Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries |
title | Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries |
title_full | Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries |
title_short | Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries |
title_sort | evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries |
topic | Emerald Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jordansmark evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT chisholmdan evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT semraumaya evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT gurungdristy evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT abdulmalikjibril evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT ahujashalini evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT mugishajames evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT mntambontokozo evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT kigozifred evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT peterseninge evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT shidhayerahul evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT upadhayanawaraj evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT lundcrick evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT thornicroftgraham evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries AT gurejeoye evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries |