Cargando…

Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries

BACKGROUND: In most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), routine mental health information is unavailable or unreliable, making monitoring of mental healthcare coverage difficult. This study aims to evaluate a new set of mental health indicators introduced in primary healthcare settings in five...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordans, Mark, Chisholm, Dan, Semrau, Maya, Gurung, Dristy, Abdulmalik, Jibril, Ahuja, Shalini, Mugisha, James, Mntambo, Ntokozo, Kigozi, Fred, Petersen, Inge, Shidhaye, Rahul, Upadhaya, Nawaraj, Lund, Crick, Thornicroft, Graham, Gureje, Oye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.22
_version_ 1783442894145716224
author Jordans, Mark
Chisholm, Dan
Semrau, Maya
Gurung, Dristy
Abdulmalik, Jibril
Ahuja, Shalini
Mugisha, James
Mntambo, Ntokozo
Kigozi, Fred
Petersen, Inge
Shidhaye, Rahul
Upadhaya, Nawaraj
Lund, Crick
Thornicroft, Graham
Gureje, Oye
author_facet Jordans, Mark
Chisholm, Dan
Semrau, Maya
Gurung, Dristy
Abdulmalik, Jibril
Ahuja, Shalini
Mugisha, James
Mntambo, Ntokozo
Kigozi, Fred
Petersen, Inge
Shidhaye, Rahul
Upadhaya, Nawaraj
Lund, Crick
Thornicroft, Graham
Gureje, Oye
author_sort Jordans, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), routine mental health information is unavailable or unreliable, making monitoring of mental healthcare coverage difficult. This study aims to evaluate a new set of mental health indicators introduced in primary healthcare settings in five LMIC. METHOD: A survey was conducted among primary healthcare workers (n = 272) to assess the acceptability and feasibility of eight new indicators monitoring mental healthcare needs, utilisation, quality and payments. Also, primary health facility case records (n = 583) were reviewed by trained research assistants to assess the level of completion (yes/no) for each of the indicators and subsequently the level of correctness of completion (correct/incorrect – with incorrect defined as illogical, missing or illegible information) of the indicators used by health workers. Assessments were conducted within 1 month of the introduction of the indicators, as well as 6–9 months afterwards. RESULTS: Across both time points and across all indicators, 78% of the measurements of indicators were complete. Among the best performing indicators (diagnosis, severity and treatment), this was significantly higher. With regards to correctness, 87% of all completed indicators were correctly completed. There was a trend towards improvement over time. Health workers' perceptions on feasibility and utility, across sites and over time, indicated a positive attitude in 81% of all measurements. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates high levels of performance and perceived utility for a set of indicators that could ultimately be used to monitor coverage of mental healthcare in primary healthcare settings in LMIC. We recommend that these indicators are incorporated into existing health information systems and adopted within the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Programme implementation strategy. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66884582019-08-23 Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries Jordans, Mark Chisholm, Dan Semrau, Maya Gurung, Dristy Abdulmalik, Jibril Ahuja, Shalini Mugisha, James Mntambo, Ntokozo Kigozi, Fred Petersen, Inge Shidhaye, Rahul Upadhaya, Nawaraj Lund, Crick Thornicroft, Graham Gureje, Oye BJPsych Open Emerald Series BACKGROUND: In most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), routine mental health information is unavailable or unreliable, making monitoring of mental healthcare coverage difficult. This study aims to evaluate a new set of mental health indicators introduced in primary healthcare settings in five LMIC. METHOD: A survey was conducted among primary healthcare workers (n = 272) to assess the acceptability and feasibility of eight new indicators monitoring mental healthcare needs, utilisation, quality and payments. Also, primary health facility case records (n = 583) were reviewed by trained research assistants to assess the level of completion (yes/no) for each of the indicators and subsequently the level of correctness of completion (correct/incorrect – with incorrect defined as illogical, missing or illegible information) of the indicators used by health workers. Assessments were conducted within 1 month of the introduction of the indicators, as well as 6–9 months afterwards. RESULTS: Across both time points and across all indicators, 78% of the measurements of indicators were complete. Among the best performing indicators (diagnosis, severity and treatment), this was significantly higher. With regards to correctness, 87% of all completed indicators were correctly completed. There was a trend towards improvement over time. Health workers' perceptions on feasibility and utility, across sites and over time, indicated a positive attitude in 81% of all measurements. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates high levels of performance and perceived utility for a set of indicators that could ultimately be used to monitor coverage of mental healthcare in primary healthcare settings in LMIC. We recommend that these indicators are incorporated into existing health information systems and adopted within the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Programme implementation strategy. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. Cambridge University Press 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6688458/ /pubmed/31530320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.22 Text en © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Emerald Series
Jordans, Mark
Chisholm, Dan
Semrau, Maya
Gurung, Dristy
Abdulmalik, Jibril
Ahuja, Shalini
Mugisha, James
Mntambo, Ntokozo
Kigozi, Fred
Petersen, Inge
Shidhaye, Rahul
Upadhaya, Nawaraj
Lund, Crick
Thornicroft, Graham
Gureje, Oye
Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
title Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
title_full Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
title_fullStr Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
title_short Evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
title_sort evaluation of performance and perceived utility of mental healthcare indicators in routine health information systems in five low- and middle-income countries
topic Emerald Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.22
work_keys_str_mv AT jordansmark evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT chisholmdan evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT semraumaya evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT gurungdristy evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT abdulmalikjibril evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT ahujashalini evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT mugishajames evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT mntambontokozo evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT kigozifred evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT peterseninge evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT shidhayerahul evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT upadhayanawaraj evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT lundcrick evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT thornicroftgraham evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries
AT gurejeoye evaluationofperformanceandperceivedutilityofmentalhealthcareindicatorsinroutinehealthinformationsystemsinfivelowandmiddleincomecountries