Cargando…
Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries
This is a brief reply to the commentaries by Adam and deBettencourt (2019); Allen (2019); Kiyonaga (2019); Schneider (2019); and Van der Stigchel and Olivers (2019), focusing on four topics: (1) I defend the idea that attention need not be characterized as a limited resource. (2) I explain how I con...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517241 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.79 |
_version_ | 1783442906088996864 |
---|---|
author | Oberauer, Klaus |
author_facet | Oberauer, Klaus |
author_sort | Oberauer, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | This is a brief reply to the commentaries by Adam and deBettencourt (2019); Allen (2019); Kiyonaga (2019); Schneider (2019); and Van der Stigchel and Olivers (2019), focusing on four topics: (1) I defend the idea that attention need not be characterized as a limited resource. (2) I explain how I conceptualize the role of WM in cognitive control, and how recruitment of sensory processing networks contributes to control but not maintenance. (3) I discuss different ways in which information can be selectively prioritized during or after being encoded into WM, and the different consequences of these processes. (4) I argue that sustained attention to a task can be understood as the mind’s ability to prioritize that task over task-unrelated representations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6688546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66885462019-09-12 Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries Oberauer, Klaus J Cogn Commentaries This is a brief reply to the commentaries by Adam and deBettencourt (2019); Allen (2019); Kiyonaga (2019); Schneider (2019); and Van der Stigchel and Olivers (2019), focusing on four topics: (1) I defend the idea that attention need not be characterized as a limited resource. (2) I explain how I conceptualize the role of WM in cognitive control, and how recruitment of sensory processing networks contributes to control but not maintenance. (3) I discuss different ways in which information can be selectively prioritized during or after being encoded into WM, and the different consequences of these processes. (4) I argue that sustained attention to a task can be understood as the mind’s ability to prioritize that task over task-unrelated representations. Ubiquity Press 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6688546/ /pubmed/31517241 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.79 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Commentaries Oberauer, Klaus Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries |
title | Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries |
title_full | Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries |
title_fullStr | Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries |
title_full_unstemmed | Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries |
title_short | Working Memory and Attention – Response to Commentaries |
title_sort | working memory and attention – response to commentaries |
topic | Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517241 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.79 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oberauerklaus workingmemoryandattentionresponsetocommentaries |