Cargando…

We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory

A vast and diverse literature describes the relationship between working memory and attention. That literature encompasses tests of the interactions between the two functions, comparisons of the processes underlying them, and theoretical formulations of the cognitive constructs. In a recent review,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kiyonaga, Anastasia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517245
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.71
_version_ 1783442906323877888
author Kiyonaga, Anastasia
author_facet Kiyonaga, Anastasia
author_sort Kiyonaga, Anastasia
collection PubMed
description A vast and diverse literature describes the relationship between working memory and attention. That literature encompasses tests of the interactions between the two functions, comparisons of the processes underlying them, and theoretical formulations of the cognitive constructs. In a recent review, Oberauer (2019) reins in this varied work to create a roadmap for future research. Here, I delineate several additional considerations to guide the evaluation and development of research into working memory and attention. Namely, working memory is a complex construct that can entail many processes and take on several meanings. Research and theory about working memory—and its relation to attention—must consider what particular demands are being tapped, what type of information is being operated on, and what goal is ultimately at stake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66885472019-09-12 We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory Kiyonaga, Anastasia J Cogn Commentaries A vast and diverse literature describes the relationship between working memory and attention. That literature encompasses tests of the interactions between the two functions, comparisons of the processes underlying them, and theoretical formulations of the cognitive constructs. In a recent review, Oberauer (2019) reins in this varied work to create a roadmap for future research. Here, I delineate several additional considerations to guide the evaluation and development of research into working memory and attention. Namely, working memory is a complex construct that can entail many processes and take on several meanings. Research and theory about working memory—and its relation to attention—must consider what particular demands are being tapped, what type of information is being operated on, and what goal is ultimately at stake. Ubiquity Press 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6688547/ /pubmed/31517245 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.71 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Commentaries
Kiyonaga, Anastasia
We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory
title We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory
title_full We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory
title_fullStr We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory
title_short We Need a Taxonomy of Working Memory
title_sort we need a taxonomy of working memory
topic Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517245
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.71
work_keys_str_mv AT kiyonagaanastasia weneedataxonomyofworkingmemory