Cargando…

Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review

OBJECTIVES: In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on digital and online symptom checkers and similar services. DESIGN: Syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chambers, Duncan, Cantrell, Anna J, Johnson, Maxine, Preston, Louise, Baxter, Susan K, Booth, Andrew, Turner, Janette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743
_version_ 1783442924745261056
author Chambers, Duncan
Cantrell, Anna J
Johnson, Maxine
Preston, Louise
Baxter, Susan K
Booth, Andrew
Turner, Janette
author_facet Chambers, Duncan
Cantrell, Anna J
Johnson, Maxine
Preston, Louise
Baxter, Susan K
Booth, Andrew
Turner, Janette
author_sort Chambers, Duncan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on digital and online symptom checkers and similar services. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science and ACM Digital Library up to April 2018, supplemented by phrase searches for known symptom checkers and citation searching of key studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies of any design that evaluated a digital or online symptom checker or health assessment service for people seeking advice about an urgent health problem. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction and quality assessment (using the Cochrane Collaboration version of QUADAS for diagnostic accuracy studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute tool for observational studies) were done by one reviewer with a sample checked for accuracy and consistency. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies structured around pre-defined research questions and key outcomes. RESULTS: We included 29 publications (27 studies). Evidence on patient safety was weak. Diagnostic accuracy varied between different systems but was generally low. Algorithm-based triage tended to be more risk averse than that of health professionals. There was very limited evidence on patients’ compliance with online triage advice. Study participants generally expressed high levels of satisfaction, although in mainly uncontrolled studies. Younger and more highly educated people were more likely to use these services. CONCLUSIONS: The English ‘digital 111’ service has been implemented against a background of uncertainty around the likely impact on important outcomes. The health system may need to respond to short-term changes and/or shifts in demand. The popularity of online and digital services with younger and more educated people has implications for health equity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018093564.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66886752019-08-16 Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review Chambers, Duncan Cantrell, Anna J Johnson, Maxine Preston, Louise Baxter, Susan K Booth, Andrew Turner, Janette BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on digital and online symptom checkers and similar services. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science and ACM Digital Library up to April 2018, supplemented by phrase searches for known symptom checkers and citation searching of key studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies of any design that evaluated a digital or online symptom checker or health assessment service for people seeking advice about an urgent health problem. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction and quality assessment (using the Cochrane Collaboration version of QUADAS for diagnostic accuracy studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute tool for observational studies) were done by one reviewer with a sample checked for accuracy and consistency. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies structured around pre-defined research questions and key outcomes. RESULTS: We included 29 publications (27 studies). Evidence on patient safety was weak. Diagnostic accuracy varied between different systems but was generally low. Algorithm-based triage tended to be more risk averse than that of health professionals. There was very limited evidence on patients’ compliance with online triage advice. Study participants generally expressed high levels of satisfaction, although in mainly uncontrolled studies. Younger and more highly educated people were more likely to use these services. CONCLUSIONS: The English ‘digital 111’ service has been implemented against a background of uncertainty around the likely impact on important outcomes. The health system may need to respond to short-term changes and/or shifts in demand. The popularity of online and digital services with younger and more educated people has implications for health equity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018093564. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6688675/ /pubmed/31375610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Chambers, Duncan
Cantrell, Anna J
Johnson, Maxine
Preston, Louise
Baxter, Susan K
Booth, Andrew
Turner, Janette
Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review
title Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review
title_full Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review
title_fullStr Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review
title_short Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review
title_sort digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743
work_keys_str_mv AT chambersduncan digitalandonlinesymptomcheckersandhealthassessmenttriageservicesforurgenthealthproblemssystematicreview
AT cantrellannaj digitalandonlinesymptomcheckersandhealthassessmenttriageservicesforurgenthealthproblemssystematicreview
AT johnsonmaxine digitalandonlinesymptomcheckersandhealthassessmenttriageservicesforurgenthealthproblemssystematicreview
AT prestonlouise digitalandonlinesymptomcheckersandhealthassessmenttriageservicesforurgenthealthproblemssystematicreview
AT baxtersusank digitalandonlinesymptomcheckersandhealthassessmenttriageservicesforurgenthealthproblemssystematicreview
AT boothandrew digitalandonlinesymptomcheckersandhealthassessmenttriageservicesforurgenthealthproblemssystematicreview
AT turnerjanette digitalandonlinesymptomcheckersandhealthassessmenttriageservicesforurgenthealthproblemssystematicreview