Cargando…

The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a patient-held health record (PHR) for asylum seekers on the availability of health-related information. METHODS: An explorative, cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial with reception centres as unit of randomisation was conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Straßner, Cornelia, Noest, Stefan, Preussler, Stella, Jahn, Rosa, Ziegler, Sandra, Wahedi, Katharina, Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001610
_version_ 1783442929819320320
author Straßner, Cornelia
Noest, Stefan
Preussler, Stella
Jahn, Rosa
Ziegler, Sandra
Wahedi, Katharina
Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
author_facet Straßner, Cornelia
Noest, Stefan
Preussler, Stella
Jahn, Rosa
Ziegler, Sandra
Wahedi, Katharina
Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
author_sort Straßner, Cornelia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a patient-held health record (PHR) for asylum seekers on the availability of health-related information. METHODS: An explorative, cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial with reception centres as unit of randomisation was conducted. All reception centres (n=6) in two large administrative areas in South Germany with on-site health services were included. All physicians working at these centres were invited to participate in the study. The intervention was the implementation of a PHR. The primary outcome was the prevalence of written health-related information. Secondary outcomes were the physicians’ dissatisfaction with the available written information and the prevalence of missing health-related information. All outcomes were measured at the level of patient–physician contacts by means of a standardised questionnaire, and analysed in logistic multi-level regression models. RESULTS: We obtained data on 2308 patient–physician contacts. The presence of the PHR increased the availability of health-related information (adjusted OR (aOR), 20.3, 95% CI: 12.74 to 32.33), and tended to reduce missing essential information (aOR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.26) and physicians’ dissatisfaction with available information (aOR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.04). The availability of health-related information in the post-intervention period was higher (aOR 4.22, 95% CI: 2.64 to 6.73), missing information (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.88) and dissatisfaction (aOR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.14) tended to be lower compared with the pre-intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare planners should consider introducing PHRs in reception centres or comparable facilities. Future research should focus on the impact of PHRs on clinical outcomes and on intersectoral care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13212716. Registered 24 November 2016. Retrospectively registered. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13212716
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66886972019-08-16 The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany Straßner, Cornelia Noest, Stefan Preussler, Stella Jahn, Rosa Ziegler, Sandra Wahedi, Katharina Bozorgmehr, Kayvan BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a patient-held health record (PHR) for asylum seekers on the availability of health-related information. METHODS: An explorative, cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial with reception centres as unit of randomisation was conducted. All reception centres (n=6) in two large administrative areas in South Germany with on-site health services were included. All physicians working at these centres were invited to participate in the study. The intervention was the implementation of a PHR. The primary outcome was the prevalence of written health-related information. Secondary outcomes were the physicians’ dissatisfaction with the available written information and the prevalence of missing health-related information. All outcomes were measured at the level of patient–physician contacts by means of a standardised questionnaire, and analysed in logistic multi-level regression models. RESULTS: We obtained data on 2308 patient–physician contacts. The presence of the PHR increased the availability of health-related information (adjusted OR (aOR), 20.3, 95% CI: 12.74 to 32.33), and tended to reduce missing essential information (aOR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.26) and physicians’ dissatisfaction with available information (aOR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.04). The availability of health-related information in the post-intervention period was higher (aOR 4.22, 95% CI: 2.64 to 6.73), missing information (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.88) and dissatisfaction (aOR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.14) tended to be lower compared with the pre-intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare planners should consider introducing PHRs in reception centres or comparable facilities. Future research should focus on the impact of PHRs on clinical outcomes and on intersectoral care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13212716. Registered 24 November 2016. Retrospectively registered. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13212716 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6688697/ /pubmed/31423347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001610 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Straßner, Cornelia
Noest, Stefan
Preussler, Stella
Jahn, Rosa
Ziegler, Sandra
Wahedi, Katharina
Bozorgmehr, Kayvan
The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany
title The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany
title_full The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany
title_fullStr The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany
title_full_unstemmed The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany
title_short The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany
title_sort impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001610
work_keys_str_mv AT straßnercornelia theimpactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT noeststefan theimpactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT preusslerstella theimpactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT jahnrosa theimpactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT zieglersandra theimpactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT wahedikatharina theimpactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT bozorgmehrkayvan theimpactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT straßnercornelia impactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT noeststefan impactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT preusslerstella impactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT jahnrosa impactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT zieglersandra impactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT wahedikatharina impactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany
AT bozorgmehrkayvan impactofpatientheldhealthrecordsoncontinuityofcareamongasylumseekersinreceptioncentresaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrialingermany