Cargando…
Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
Numerous factors affect reaction times to vibrotactile cues. Therefore, it is important to consider the relative magnitudes of these time delays when designing vibrotactile displays for real-time applications. The objectives of this study were to quantify reaction times to typical vibrotactile stimu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31398207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219737 |
_version_ | 1783442951279476736 |
---|---|
author | Bao, Tian Su, Lydia Kinnaird, Catherine Kabeto, Mohammed Shull, Peter B. Sienko, Kathleen H. |
author_facet | Bao, Tian Su, Lydia Kinnaird, Catherine Kabeto, Mohammed Shull, Peter B. Sienko, Kathleen H. |
author_sort | Bao, Tian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Numerous factors affect reaction times to vibrotactile cues. Therefore, it is important to consider the relative magnitudes of these time delays when designing vibrotactile displays for real-time applications. The objectives of this study were to quantify reaction times to typical vibrotactile stimuli parameters through direct comparison within a single experimental setting, and to determine the relative importance of these factors on reaction times. Young (n = 10, 21.9 ± 1.3 yrs) and older adults (n = 13, 69.4 ± 5.0 yrs) performed simple reaction time tasks by responding to vibrotactile stimuli using a thumb trigger while frequency, location, auditory cues, number of tactors in the same location, and tactor type were varied. Participants also performed a secondary task in a subset of the trials. The factors investigated in this study affected reaction times by 20–300 ms (reaction time findings are noted in parentheses) depending on the specific stimuli condition. In general, auditory cues generated by the tactors (<20 ms), vibration frequency (<20 ms), number of tactors in the same location (<30 ms) and tactor type (<50 ms) had relatively small effects on reaction times, while stimulus location (20–120 ms) and secondary cognitive task (>130 ms) had relatively large effects. Factors affected young and older adults’ reaction times in a similar manner, but with different magnitudes. These findings can inform the development of vibrotactile displays by enabling designers to directly compare the relative effects of key factors on reaction times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6688825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66888252019-08-15 Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times Bao, Tian Su, Lydia Kinnaird, Catherine Kabeto, Mohammed Shull, Peter B. Sienko, Kathleen H. PLoS One Research Article Numerous factors affect reaction times to vibrotactile cues. Therefore, it is important to consider the relative magnitudes of these time delays when designing vibrotactile displays for real-time applications. The objectives of this study were to quantify reaction times to typical vibrotactile stimuli parameters through direct comparison within a single experimental setting, and to determine the relative importance of these factors on reaction times. Young (n = 10, 21.9 ± 1.3 yrs) and older adults (n = 13, 69.4 ± 5.0 yrs) performed simple reaction time tasks by responding to vibrotactile stimuli using a thumb trigger while frequency, location, auditory cues, number of tactors in the same location, and tactor type were varied. Participants also performed a secondary task in a subset of the trials. The factors investigated in this study affected reaction times by 20–300 ms (reaction time findings are noted in parentheses) depending on the specific stimuli condition. In general, auditory cues generated by the tactors (<20 ms), vibration frequency (<20 ms), number of tactors in the same location (<30 ms) and tactor type (<50 ms) had relatively small effects on reaction times, while stimulus location (20–120 ms) and secondary cognitive task (>130 ms) had relatively large effects. Factors affected young and older adults’ reaction times in a similar manner, but with different magnitudes. These findings can inform the development of vibrotactile displays by enabling designers to directly compare the relative effects of key factors on reaction times. Public Library of Science 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6688825/ /pubmed/31398207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219737 Text en © 2019 Bao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bao, Tian Su, Lydia Kinnaird, Catherine Kabeto, Mohammed Shull, Peter B. Sienko, Kathleen H. Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times |
title | Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times |
title_full | Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times |
title_fullStr | Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times |
title_full_unstemmed | Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times |
title_short | Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times |
title_sort | vibrotactile display design: quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31398207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219737 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baotian vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes AT sulydia vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes AT kinnairdcatherine vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes AT kabetomohammed vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes AT shullpeterb vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes AT sienkokathleenh vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes |