Cargando…

Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times

Numerous factors affect reaction times to vibrotactile cues. Therefore, it is important to consider the relative magnitudes of these time delays when designing vibrotactile displays for real-time applications. The objectives of this study were to quantify reaction times to typical vibrotactile stimu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bao, Tian, Su, Lydia, Kinnaird, Catherine, Kabeto, Mohammed, Shull, Peter B., Sienko, Kathleen H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31398207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219737
_version_ 1783442951279476736
author Bao, Tian
Su, Lydia
Kinnaird, Catherine
Kabeto, Mohammed
Shull, Peter B.
Sienko, Kathleen H.
author_facet Bao, Tian
Su, Lydia
Kinnaird, Catherine
Kabeto, Mohammed
Shull, Peter B.
Sienko, Kathleen H.
author_sort Bao, Tian
collection PubMed
description Numerous factors affect reaction times to vibrotactile cues. Therefore, it is important to consider the relative magnitudes of these time delays when designing vibrotactile displays for real-time applications. The objectives of this study were to quantify reaction times to typical vibrotactile stimuli parameters through direct comparison within a single experimental setting, and to determine the relative importance of these factors on reaction times. Young (n = 10, 21.9 ± 1.3 yrs) and older adults (n = 13, 69.4 ± 5.0 yrs) performed simple reaction time tasks by responding to vibrotactile stimuli using a thumb trigger while frequency, location, auditory cues, number of tactors in the same location, and tactor type were varied. Participants also performed a secondary task in a subset of the trials. The factors investigated in this study affected reaction times by 20–300 ms (reaction time findings are noted in parentheses) depending on the specific stimuli condition. In general, auditory cues generated by the tactors (<20 ms), vibration frequency (<20 ms), number of tactors in the same location (<30 ms) and tactor type (<50 ms) had relatively small effects on reaction times, while stimulus location (20–120 ms) and secondary cognitive task (>130 ms) had relatively large effects. Factors affected young and older adults’ reaction times in a similar manner, but with different magnitudes. These findings can inform the development of vibrotactile displays by enabling designers to directly compare the relative effects of key factors on reaction times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66888252019-08-15 Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times Bao, Tian Su, Lydia Kinnaird, Catherine Kabeto, Mohammed Shull, Peter B. Sienko, Kathleen H. PLoS One Research Article Numerous factors affect reaction times to vibrotactile cues. Therefore, it is important to consider the relative magnitudes of these time delays when designing vibrotactile displays for real-time applications. The objectives of this study were to quantify reaction times to typical vibrotactile stimuli parameters through direct comparison within a single experimental setting, and to determine the relative importance of these factors on reaction times. Young (n = 10, 21.9 ± 1.3 yrs) and older adults (n = 13, 69.4 ± 5.0 yrs) performed simple reaction time tasks by responding to vibrotactile stimuli using a thumb trigger while frequency, location, auditory cues, number of tactors in the same location, and tactor type were varied. Participants also performed a secondary task in a subset of the trials. The factors investigated in this study affected reaction times by 20–300 ms (reaction time findings are noted in parentheses) depending on the specific stimuli condition. In general, auditory cues generated by the tactors (<20 ms), vibration frequency (<20 ms), number of tactors in the same location (<30 ms) and tactor type (<50 ms) had relatively small effects on reaction times, while stimulus location (20–120 ms) and secondary cognitive task (>130 ms) had relatively large effects. Factors affected young and older adults’ reaction times in a similar manner, but with different magnitudes. These findings can inform the development of vibrotactile displays by enabling designers to directly compare the relative effects of key factors on reaction times. Public Library of Science 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6688825/ /pubmed/31398207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219737 Text en © 2019 Bao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bao, Tian
Su, Lydia
Kinnaird, Catherine
Kabeto, Mohammed
Shull, Peter B.
Sienko, Kathleen H.
Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
title Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
title_full Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
title_fullStr Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
title_full_unstemmed Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
title_short Vibrotactile display design: Quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
title_sort vibrotactile display design: quantifying the importance of age and various factors on reaction times
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31398207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219737
work_keys_str_mv AT baotian vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes
AT sulydia vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes
AT kinnairdcatherine vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes
AT kabetomohammed vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes
AT shullpeterb vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes
AT sienkokathleenh vibrotactiledisplaydesignquantifyingtheimportanceofageandvariousfactorsonreactiontimes