Cargando…

Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND: Over the years, a trend has evolved towards operative treatment of flail chest although evidence is limited. Furthermore, little is known about operative treatment for patients with multiple rib fractures without a flail chest. The aim of this study was to compare rib fixation based on a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beks, Reinier B., Reetz, David, de Jong, Mirjam B., Groenwold, Rolf H. H., Hietbrink, Falco, Edwards, Michael J. R., Leenen, Luke P. H., Houwert, Roderick Marijn, Frölke, Jan Paul M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1037-1
_version_ 1783442974010507264
author Beks, Reinier B.
Reetz, David
de Jong, Mirjam B.
Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
Edwards, Michael J. R.
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Houwert, Roderick Marijn
Frölke, Jan Paul M.
author_facet Beks, Reinier B.
Reetz, David
de Jong, Mirjam B.
Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
Edwards, Michael J. R.
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Houwert, Roderick Marijn
Frölke, Jan Paul M.
author_sort Beks, Reinier B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the years, a trend has evolved towards operative treatment of flail chest although evidence is limited. Furthermore, little is known about operative treatment for patients with multiple rib fractures without a flail chest. The aim of this study was to compare rib fixation based on a clinical treatment algorithm with nonoperative treatment for both patients with a flail chest or multiple rib fractures. METHODS: All patients with ≥ 3 rib fractures admitted to one of the two contributing hospitals between January 2014 and January 2017 were retrospectively included in this multicenter cohort study. One hospital treated all patients nonoperatively and the other hospital treated patients with rib fixation according to a clinical treatment algorithm. Primary outcome measures were intensive care length of stay and hospital length of stay for patients with a flail chest and patients with multiple rib fractures, respectively. To control for potential confounding, propensity score matching was applied. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients were treated according to protocol and available for analysis. The mean age was 56 (SD 17) years old and 257 (77%) patients were male. The overall mean Injury Severity Score was 23 (SD 11) and the average number of rib fractures was 8 (SD 4). There were 92 patients with a flail chest, 37 (40%) had rib fixation and 55 (60%) had non-operative treatment. There were 240 patients with multiple rib fractures, 28 (12%) had rib fixation and 212 (88%) had non-operative treatment. For both patient groups, after propensity score matching, rib fixation was not associated with intensive care unit length of stay (for flail chest patients) nor with hospital length of stay (for multiple rib fracture patients), nor with the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION: No advantage could be demonstrated for operative fixation of rib fractures. Future studies are needed before rib fixation is embedded or abandoned in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6689036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66890362019-08-23 Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study Beks, Reinier B. Reetz, David de Jong, Mirjam B. Groenwold, Rolf H. H. Hietbrink, Falco Edwards, Michael J. R. Leenen, Luke P. H. Houwert, Roderick Marijn Frölke, Jan Paul M. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Over the years, a trend has evolved towards operative treatment of flail chest although evidence is limited. Furthermore, little is known about operative treatment for patients with multiple rib fractures without a flail chest. The aim of this study was to compare rib fixation based on a clinical treatment algorithm with nonoperative treatment for both patients with a flail chest or multiple rib fractures. METHODS: All patients with ≥ 3 rib fractures admitted to one of the two contributing hospitals between January 2014 and January 2017 were retrospectively included in this multicenter cohort study. One hospital treated all patients nonoperatively and the other hospital treated patients with rib fixation according to a clinical treatment algorithm. Primary outcome measures were intensive care length of stay and hospital length of stay for patients with a flail chest and patients with multiple rib fractures, respectively. To control for potential confounding, propensity score matching was applied. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients were treated according to protocol and available for analysis. The mean age was 56 (SD 17) years old and 257 (77%) patients were male. The overall mean Injury Severity Score was 23 (SD 11) and the average number of rib fractures was 8 (SD 4). There were 92 patients with a flail chest, 37 (40%) had rib fixation and 55 (60%) had non-operative treatment. There were 240 patients with multiple rib fractures, 28 (12%) had rib fixation and 212 (88%) had non-operative treatment. For both patient groups, after propensity score matching, rib fixation was not associated with intensive care unit length of stay (for flail chest patients) nor with hospital length of stay (for multiple rib fracture patients), nor with the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSION: No advantage could be demonstrated for operative fixation of rib fractures. Future studies are needed before rib fixation is embedded or abandoned in clinical practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6689036/ /pubmed/30341561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1037-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Beks, Reinier B.
Reetz, David
de Jong, Mirjam B.
Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
Edwards, Michael J. R.
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Houwert, Roderick Marijn
Frölke, Jan Paul M.
Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study
title Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study
title_full Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study
title_fullStr Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study
title_short Rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study
title_sort rib fixation versus non-operative treatment for flail chest and multiple rib fractures after blunt thoracic trauma: a multicenter cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1037-1
work_keys_str_mv AT beksreinierb ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT reetzdavid ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT dejongmirjamb ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT groenwoldrolfhh ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT hietbrinkfalco ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT edwardsmichaeljr ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT leenenlukeph ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT houwertroderickmarijn ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy
AT frolkejanpaulm ribfixationversusnonoperativetreatmentforflailchestandmultipleribfracturesafterbluntthoracictraumaamulticentercohortstudy