Cargando…

Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial

BACKGROUND: Lung nodules are a diagnostic challenge, with an estimated yearly incidence of 1.6 million in the United States. This study evaluated the accuracy of an integrated proteomic classifier in identifying benign nodules in patients with a pretest probability of cancer (pCA) ≤ 50%. METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvestri, Gerard A., Tanner, Nichole T., Kearney, Paul, Vachani, Anil, Massion, Pierre P., Porter, Alexander, Springmeyer, Steven C., Fang, Kenneth C., Midthun, David, Mazzone, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American College of Chest Physicians 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29496499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.02.012
_version_ 1783442989231636480
author Silvestri, Gerard A.
Tanner, Nichole T.
Kearney, Paul
Vachani, Anil
Massion, Pierre P.
Porter, Alexander
Springmeyer, Steven C.
Fang, Kenneth C.
Midthun, David
Mazzone, Peter J.
author_facet Silvestri, Gerard A.
Tanner, Nichole T.
Kearney, Paul
Vachani, Anil
Massion, Pierre P.
Porter, Alexander
Springmeyer, Steven C.
Fang, Kenneth C.
Midthun, David
Mazzone, Peter J.
author_sort Silvestri, Gerard A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung nodules are a diagnostic challenge, with an estimated yearly incidence of 1.6 million in the United States. This study evaluated the accuracy of an integrated proteomic classifier in identifying benign nodules in patients with a pretest probability of cancer (pCA) ≤ 50%. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter observational trial of 685 patients with 8- to 30-mm lung nodules was conducted. Multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry was used to measure the relative abundance of two plasma proteins, LG3BP and C163A. Results were integrated with a clinical risk prediction model to identify likely benign nodules. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were calculated. Estimates of potential changes in invasive testing had the integrated classifier results been available and acted on were made. RESULTS: A subgroup of 178 patients with a clinician-assessed pCA ≤ 50% had a 16% prevalence of lung cancer. The integrated classifier demonstrated a sensitivity of 97% (CI, 82-100), a specificity of 44% (CI, 36-52), and a negative predictive value of 98% (CI, 92-100) in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. The classifier performed better than PET, validated lung nodule risk models, and physician cancer probability estimates (P < .001). If the integrated classifier results were used to direct care, 40% fewer procedures would be performed on benign nodules, and 3% of malignant nodules would be misclassified. CONCLUSIONS: When used in patients with lung nodules with a pCA ≤ 50%, the integrated classifier accurately identifies benign lung nodules with good performance characteristics. If used in clinical practice, invasive procedures could be reduced by diverting benign nodules to surveillance. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01752114; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6689113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American College of Chest Physicians
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66891132019-09-01 Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial Silvestri, Gerard A. Tanner, Nichole T. Kearney, Paul Vachani, Anil Massion, Pierre P. Porter, Alexander Springmeyer, Steven C. Fang, Kenneth C. Midthun, David Mazzone, Peter J. Chest Lung Cancer BACKGROUND: Lung nodules are a diagnostic challenge, with an estimated yearly incidence of 1.6 million in the United States. This study evaluated the accuracy of an integrated proteomic classifier in identifying benign nodules in patients with a pretest probability of cancer (pCA) ≤ 50%. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter observational trial of 685 patients with 8- to 30-mm lung nodules was conducted. Multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry was used to measure the relative abundance of two plasma proteins, LG3BP and C163A. Results were integrated with a clinical risk prediction model to identify likely benign nodules. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were calculated. Estimates of potential changes in invasive testing had the integrated classifier results been available and acted on were made. RESULTS: A subgroup of 178 patients with a clinician-assessed pCA ≤ 50% had a 16% prevalence of lung cancer. The integrated classifier demonstrated a sensitivity of 97% (CI, 82-100), a specificity of 44% (CI, 36-52), and a negative predictive value of 98% (CI, 92-100) in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. The classifier performed better than PET, validated lung nodule risk models, and physician cancer probability estimates (P < .001). If the integrated classifier results were used to direct care, 40% fewer procedures would be performed on benign nodules, and 3% of malignant nodules would be misclassified. CONCLUSIONS: When used in patients with lung nodules with a pCA ≤ 50%, the integrated classifier accurately identifies benign lung nodules with good performance characteristics. If used in clinical practice, invasive procedures could be reduced by diverting benign nodules to surveillance. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01752114; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov). American College of Chest Physicians 2018-09 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6689113/ /pubmed/29496499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.02.012 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Lung Cancer
Silvestri, Gerard A.
Tanner, Nichole T.
Kearney, Paul
Vachani, Anil
Massion, Pierre P.
Porter, Alexander
Springmeyer, Steven C.
Fang, Kenneth C.
Midthun, David
Mazzone, Peter J.
Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial
title Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial
title_full Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial
title_fullStr Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial
title_short Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker’s Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial
title_sort assessment of plasma proteomics biomarker’s ability to distinguish benign from malignant lung nodules: results of the panoptic (pulmonary nodule plasma proteomic classifier) trial
topic Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29496499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.02.012
work_keys_str_mv AT silvestrigerarda assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT tannernicholet assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT kearneypaul assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT vachanianil assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT massionpierrep assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT porteralexander assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT springmeyerstevenc assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT fangkennethc assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT midthundavid assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT mazzonepeterj assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial
AT assessmentofplasmaproteomicsbiomarkersabilitytodistinguishbenignfrommalignantlungnodulesresultsofthepanopticpulmonarynoduleplasmaproteomicclassifiertrial