Cargando…

Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning

INTRODUCTION: Adverse event (AE) under-reporting has been a recurrent issue raised during health authorities Good Clinical Practices (GCP) inspections and audits. Moreover, safety under-reporting poses a risk to patient safety and data integrity. The current clinical Quality Assurance (QA) practices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ménard, Timothé, Barmaz, Yves, Koneswarakantha, Björn, Bowling, Rich, Popko, Leszek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00831-4
_version_ 1783443013190549504
author Ménard, Timothé
Barmaz, Yves
Koneswarakantha, Björn
Bowling, Rich
Popko, Leszek
author_facet Ménard, Timothé
Barmaz, Yves
Koneswarakantha, Björn
Bowling, Rich
Popko, Leszek
author_sort Ménard, Timothé
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Adverse event (AE) under-reporting has been a recurrent issue raised during health authorities Good Clinical Practices (GCP) inspections and audits. Moreover, safety under-reporting poses a risk to patient safety and data integrity. The current clinical Quality Assurance (QA) practices used to detect AE under-reporting rely heavily on investigator site and study audits. Yet several sponsors and institutions have had repeated findings related to safety reporting, and this has led to delays in regulatory submissions. Recent developments in data management and IT systems allow data scientists to apply techniques such as machine learning to detect AE under-reporting in an automated fashion. OBJECTIVE: In this project, we developed a predictive model that enables Roche/Genentech Quality Program Leads oversight of AE reporting at the program, study, site, and patient level. This project was part of a broader effort at Roche/Genentech Product Development Quality to apply advanced analytics to augment and complement traditional clinical QA approaches. METHOD: We used a curated data set from 104 completed Roche/Genentech sponsored clinical studies to train a machine learning model to predict the expected number of AEs. Our final model used 54 features built on patient (e.g., demographics, vitals) and study attributes (e.g., molecule class, disease area). RESULTS: In order to evaluate model performance, we tested how well it would detect simulated test cases based on data not used for model training. For relevant simulation scenarios of 25%, 50%, and 75% under-reporting on the site level, our model scored an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.62, 0.79, and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSION: The model has been deployed to evaluate safety reporting performance in a set of ongoing studies in the form of a QA/dashboard cockpit available to Roche Quality Program Leads. Applicability and production performance will be assessed over the next 12–24 months in which we will develop a validation strategy to fully integrate our model into Roche QA processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-019-00831-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6689279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66892792019-08-23 Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning Ménard, Timothé Barmaz, Yves Koneswarakantha, Björn Bowling, Rich Popko, Leszek Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Adverse event (AE) under-reporting has been a recurrent issue raised during health authorities Good Clinical Practices (GCP) inspections and audits. Moreover, safety under-reporting poses a risk to patient safety and data integrity. The current clinical Quality Assurance (QA) practices used to detect AE under-reporting rely heavily on investigator site and study audits. Yet several sponsors and institutions have had repeated findings related to safety reporting, and this has led to delays in regulatory submissions. Recent developments in data management and IT systems allow data scientists to apply techniques such as machine learning to detect AE under-reporting in an automated fashion. OBJECTIVE: In this project, we developed a predictive model that enables Roche/Genentech Quality Program Leads oversight of AE reporting at the program, study, site, and patient level. This project was part of a broader effort at Roche/Genentech Product Development Quality to apply advanced analytics to augment and complement traditional clinical QA approaches. METHOD: We used a curated data set from 104 completed Roche/Genentech sponsored clinical studies to train a machine learning model to predict the expected number of AEs. Our final model used 54 features built on patient (e.g., demographics, vitals) and study attributes (e.g., molecule class, disease area). RESULTS: In order to evaluate model performance, we tested how well it would detect simulated test cases based on data not used for model training. For relevant simulation scenarios of 25%, 50%, and 75% under-reporting on the site level, our model scored an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.62, 0.79, and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSION: The model has been deployed to evaluate safety reporting performance in a set of ongoing studies in the form of a QA/dashboard cockpit available to Roche Quality Program Leads. Applicability and production performance will be assessed over the next 12–24 months in which we will develop a validation strategy to fully integrate our model into Roche QA processes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-019-00831-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-23 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6689279/ /pubmed/31123940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00831-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ménard, Timothé
Barmaz, Yves
Koneswarakantha, Björn
Bowling, Rich
Popko, Leszek
Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning
title Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning
title_full Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning
title_fullStr Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning
title_short Enabling Data-Driven Clinical Quality Assurance: Predicting Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials Using Machine Learning
title_sort enabling data-driven clinical quality assurance: predicting adverse event reporting in clinical trials using machine learning
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00831-4
work_keys_str_mv AT menardtimothe enablingdatadrivenclinicalqualityassurancepredictingadverseeventreportinginclinicaltrialsusingmachinelearning
AT barmazyves enablingdatadrivenclinicalqualityassurancepredictingadverseeventreportinginclinicaltrialsusingmachinelearning
AT koneswarakanthabjorn enablingdatadrivenclinicalqualityassurancepredictingadverseeventreportinginclinicaltrialsusingmachinelearning
AT bowlingrich enablingdatadrivenclinicalqualityassurancepredictingadverseeventreportinginclinicaltrialsusingmachinelearning
AT popkoleszek enablingdatadrivenclinicalqualityassurancepredictingadverseeventreportinginclinicaltrialsusingmachinelearning