Cargando…

Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a highly effective treatment in patients with a class I recommendation. However, a small proportion of the strictly selected patients still fail to respond. This study was designed to identify predictors of non-response in patients with class I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Yi-Ran, Hua, Wei, Yang, Sheng-Wen, Gu, Min, Niu, Hong-Xia, Ding, Li-Gang, Wang, Jing, Jing, Ran, Fan, Xiao-Han, Zhang, Shu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Science Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447890
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.009
_version_ 1783443033723764736
author Hu, Yi-Ran
Hua, Wei
Yang, Sheng-Wen
Gu, Min
Niu, Hong-Xia
Ding, Li-Gang
Wang, Jing
Jing, Ran
Fan, Xiao-Han
Zhang, Shu
author_facet Hu, Yi-Ran
Hua, Wei
Yang, Sheng-Wen
Gu, Min
Niu, Hong-Xia
Ding, Li-Gang
Wang, Jing
Jing, Ran
Fan, Xiao-Han
Zhang, Shu
author_sort Hu, Yi-Ran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a highly effective treatment in patients with a class I recommendation. However, a small proportion of the strictly selected patients still fail to respond. This study was designed to identify predictors of non-response in patients with class I indications for CRT and determine the non-response probability of the patients. METHODS: A total of 296 consecutive patients with a class I recommendation received CRT from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for non-response (defined as cardiac death, heart transplantation, or HF hospitalization during 1-year follow-up). RESULTS: Among 296 patients, 30 (10.1%) met non-response. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-response to CRT was associated with a fragmented QRS (odd ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.14–7.12; P = 0.025) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 77 mm (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.17–7.82; P = 0.022). Patients with both of the predictors had a non-response probability of 46.2% (95% CI: 19.1%–73.3%). CONCLUSION: In patients with left bundle branch block and wider QRS duration, the proportion of non-response to CRT is not low in real world. The presence of the dilated LVEDD or fragmented QRS is a strong predictor of non-response to CRT. The probability of non-response in the patients with the two predictors was 46.2%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6689517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Science Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66895172019-08-23 Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS Hu, Yi-Ran Hua, Wei Yang, Sheng-Wen Gu, Min Niu, Hong-Xia Ding, Li-Gang Wang, Jing Jing, Ran Fan, Xiao-Han Zhang, Shu J Geriatr Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a highly effective treatment in patients with a class I recommendation. However, a small proportion of the strictly selected patients still fail to respond. This study was designed to identify predictors of non-response in patients with class I indications for CRT and determine the non-response probability of the patients. METHODS: A total of 296 consecutive patients with a class I recommendation received CRT from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for non-response (defined as cardiac death, heart transplantation, or HF hospitalization during 1-year follow-up). RESULTS: Among 296 patients, 30 (10.1%) met non-response. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-response to CRT was associated with a fragmented QRS (odd ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.14–7.12; P = 0.025) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 77 mm (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.17–7.82; P = 0.022). Patients with both of the predictors had a non-response probability of 46.2% (95% CI: 19.1%–73.3%). CONCLUSION: In patients with left bundle branch block and wider QRS duration, the proportion of non-response to CRT is not low in real world. The presence of the dilated LVEDD or fragmented QRS is a strong predictor of non-response to CRT. The probability of non-response in the patients with the two predictors was 46.2%. Science Press 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6689517/ /pubmed/31447890 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.009 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Yi-Ran
Hua, Wei
Yang, Sheng-Wen
Gu, Min
Niu, Hong-Xia
Ding, Li-Gang
Wang, Jing
Jing, Ran
Fan, Xiao-Han
Zhang, Shu
Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS
title Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS
title_full Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS
title_fullStr Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS
title_short Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS
title_sort predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class i indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented qrs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447890
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.009
work_keys_str_mv AT huyiran predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT huawei predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT yangshengwen predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT gumin predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT niuhongxia predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT dingligang predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT wangjing predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT jingran predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT fanxiaohan predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs
AT zhangshu predictorsofnonresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapyimplantationinpatientswithclassiindicationsthemarkedlydilatedleftventricularenddiastolicdimensionandthepresenceoffragmentedqrs