Cargando…
Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science
Assessing scientists using exploitable metrics can lead to the degradation of research methods even without any strategic behaviour on the part of individuals, via ‘the natural selection of bad science.’ Institutional incentives to maximize metrics like publication quantity and impact drive this dyn...
Autores principales: | Smaldino, Paul E., Turner, Matthew A., Contreras Kallens, Pablo A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31417725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190194 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction to ‘Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science’
por: Smaldino, Paul E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The natural selection of bad science
por: Smaldino, Paul E., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Replication of the natural selection of bad science
por: Kohrt, Florian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
por: Fang, Ferric C., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Correction to: ‘The natural selection of bad science’ (2016) by Paul E. Smaldino and Richard McElreath
por: Smaldino, Paul E., et al.
Publicado: (2023)