Cargando…

A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke

The impact of rehabilitation on post-stroke motor recovery and its dependency on the patient’s chronicity remain unclear. The field has widely accepted the notion of a proportional recovery rule with a “critical window for recovery” within the first 3–6 mo poststroke. This hypothesis justifies the g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballester, Belén Rubio, Maier, Martina, Duff, Armin, Cameirão, Mónica, Bermúdez, Sergi, Duarte, Esther, Cuxart, Ampar, Rodríguez, Susana, San Segundo Mozo, Rosa María, Verschure, Paul F. M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00762.2018
_version_ 1783443086618132480
author Ballester, Belén Rubio
Maier, Martina
Duff, Armin
Cameirão, Mónica
Bermúdez, Sergi
Duarte, Esther
Cuxart, Ampar
Rodríguez, Susana
San Segundo Mozo, Rosa María
Verschure, Paul F. M. J.
author_facet Ballester, Belén Rubio
Maier, Martina
Duff, Armin
Cameirão, Mónica
Bermúdez, Sergi
Duarte, Esther
Cuxart, Ampar
Rodríguez, Susana
San Segundo Mozo, Rosa María
Verschure, Paul F. M. J.
author_sort Ballester, Belén Rubio
collection PubMed
description The impact of rehabilitation on post-stroke motor recovery and its dependency on the patient’s chronicity remain unclear. The field has widely accepted the notion of a proportional recovery rule with a “critical window for recovery” within the first 3–6 mo poststroke. This hypothesis justifies the general cessation of physical therapy at chronic stages. However, the limits of this critical window have, so far, been poorly defined. In this analysis, we address this question, and we further explore the temporal structure of motor recovery using individual patient data from a homogeneous sample of 219 individuals with mild to moderate upper-limb hemiparesis. We observed that improvement in body function and structure was possible even at late chronic stages. A bootstrapping analysis revealed a gradient of enhanced sensitivity to treatment that extended beyond 12 mo poststroke. Clinical guidelines for rehabilitation should be revised in the context of this temporal structure. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous studies in humans suggest that there is a 3- to 6-mo “critical window” of heightened neuroplasticity poststroke. We analyze the temporal structure of recovery in patients with hemiparesis and uncover a precise gradient of enhanced sensitivity to treatment that expands far beyond the limits of the so-called critical window. These findings highlight the need for providing therapy to patients at the chronic and late chronic stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6689791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66897912019-08-15 A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke Ballester, Belén Rubio Maier, Martina Duff, Armin Cameirão, Mónica Bermúdez, Sergi Duarte, Esther Cuxart, Ampar Rodríguez, Susana San Segundo Mozo, Rosa María Verschure, Paul F. M. J. J Neurophysiol Research Article The impact of rehabilitation on post-stroke motor recovery and its dependency on the patient’s chronicity remain unclear. The field has widely accepted the notion of a proportional recovery rule with a “critical window for recovery” within the first 3–6 mo poststroke. This hypothesis justifies the general cessation of physical therapy at chronic stages. However, the limits of this critical window have, so far, been poorly defined. In this analysis, we address this question, and we further explore the temporal structure of motor recovery using individual patient data from a homogeneous sample of 219 individuals with mild to moderate upper-limb hemiparesis. We observed that improvement in body function and structure was possible even at late chronic stages. A bootstrapping analysis revealed a gradient of enhanced sensitivity to treatment that extended beyond 12 mo poststroke. Clinical guidelines for rehabilitation should be revised in the context of this temporal structure. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous studies in humans suggest that there is a 3- to 6-mo “critical window” of heightened neuroplasticity poststroke. We analyze the temporal structure of recovery in patients with hemiparesis and uncover a precise gradient of enhanced sensitivity to treatment that expands far beyond the limits of the so-called critical window. These findings highlight the need for providing therapy to patients at the chronic and late chronic stages. American Physiological Society 2019-07-01 2019-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6689791/ /pubmed/31141442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00762.2018 Text en Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US) : © the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ballester, Belén Rubio
Maier, Martina
Duff, Armin
Cameirão, Mónica
Bermúdez, Sergi
Duarte, Esther
Cuxart, Ampar
Rodríguez, Susana
San Segundo Mozo, Rosa María
Verschure, Paul F. M. J.
A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke
title A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke
title_full A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke
title_fullStr A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke
title_full_unstemmed A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke
title_short A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke
title_sort critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31141442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00762.2018
work_keys_str_mv AT ballesterbelenrubio acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT maiermartina acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT duffarmin acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT cameiraomonica acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT bermudezsergi acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT duarteesther acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT cuxartampar acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT rodriguezsusana acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT sansegundomozorosamaria acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT verschurepaulfmj acriticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT ballesterbelenrubio criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT maiermartina criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT duffarmin criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT cameiraomonica criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT bermudezsergi criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT duarteesther criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT cuxartampar criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT rodriguezsusana criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT sansegundomozorosamaria criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke
AT verschurepaulfmj criticaltimewindowforrecoveryextendsbeyondoneyearpoststroke