Cargando…
Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is widely used worldwide, and systematic reviews on acupuncture are increasingly being published. Although acupuncture systematic reviews share several essential elements with other systematic reviews, some essential information for the application of acupuncture is not cover...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31405367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3 |
_version_ | 1783443105871036416 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xiaoqin Chen, Yaolong Liu, Yali Yao, Liang Estill, Janne Bian, Zhaoxiang Wu, Taixiang Shang, Hongcai Lee, Myeong Soo Wei, Dang Tian, Jinhui Ma, Bin Wang, Yongfeng Tian, Guihua Yang, Kehu |
author_facet | Wang, Xiaoqin Chen, Yaolong Liu, Yali Yao, Liang Estill, Janne Bian, Zhaoxiang Wu, Taixiang Shang, Hongcai Lee, Myeong Soo Wei, Dang Tian, Jinhui Ma, Bin Wang, Yongfeng Tian, Guihua Yang, Kehu |
author_sort | Wang, Xiaoqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is widely used worldwide, and systematic reviews on acupuncture are increasingly being published. Although acupuncture systematic reviews share several essential elements with other systematic reviews, some essential information for the application of acupuncture is not covered by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Considering this, we aimed to develop an extension of the PRISMA statement for acupuncture systematic reviews. METHODS: We used the PRISMA statement as a starting point, and conducted this study referring to the development strategy recommended by the EQUATOR network. The initial items were collected through a wide survey among evidence users and a review of relevant studies. We conducted a three-round Delphi survey and one-day face-to-face meeting to select items and formulate the checklist. After the consensus meeting, we drafted the manuscript (including the checklist) and sent it to our advisory experts for comments, following which the checklist was refined and circulated to a group of acupuncture systematic review authors for pilot test. We also selected a sample of acupuncture systematic reviews published in 2017 to test the checklist. RESULTS: A checklist of five new sub-items (including sub items) and six modified items was formulated, involving content related to title, rationale, eligibility criteria, literature search, data extraction, and study characteristics. We clarified the rationales of the items and provided examples for each item for additional guidance. CONCLUSION: The PRISMA for Acupuncture checklist is developed for improving the reporting of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have registered the study on the EQUATOR network (http://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/#91). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6689876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66898762019-08-14 Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist Wang, Xiaoqin Chen, Yaolong Liu, Yali Yao, Liang Estill, Janne Bian, Zhaoxiang Wu, Taixiang Shang, Hongcai Lee, Myeong Soo Wei, Dang Tian, Jinhui Ma, Bin Wang, Yongfeng Tian, Guihua Yang, Kehu BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is widely used worldwide, and systematic reviews on acupuncture are increasingly being published. Although acupuncture systematic reviews share several essential elements with other systematic reviews, some essential information for the application of acupuncture is not covered by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Considering this, we aimed to develop an extension of the PRISMA statement for acupuncture systematic reviews. METHODS: We used the PRISMA statement as a starting point, and conducted this study referring to the development strategy recommended by the EQUATOR network. The initial items were collected through a wide survey among evidence users and a review of relevant studies. We conducted a three-round Delphi survey and one-day face-to-face meeting to select items and formulate the checklist. After the consensus meeting, we drafted the manuscript (including the checklist) and sent it to our advisory experts for comments, following which the checklist was refined and circulated to a group of acupuncture systematic review authors for pilot test. We also selected a sample of acupuncture systematic reviews published in 2017 to test the checklist. RESULTS: A checklist of five new sub-items (including sub items) and six modified items was formulated, involving content related to title, rationale, eligibility criteria, literature search, data extraction, and study characteristics. We clarified the rationales of the items and provided examples for each item for additional guidance. CONCLUSION: The PRISMA for Acupuncture checklist is developed for improving the reporting of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have registered the study on the EQUATOR network (http://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/#91). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6689876/ /pubmed/31405367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Xiaoqin Chen, Yaolong Liu, Yali Yao, Liang Estill, Janne Bian, Zhaoxiang Wu, Taixiang Shang, Hongcai Lee, Myeong Soo Wei, Dang Tian, Jinhui Ma, Bin Wang, Yongfeng Tian, Guihua Yang, Kehu Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist |
title | Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist |
title_full | Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist |
title_fullStr | Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist |
title_short | Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist |
title_sort | reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the prisma for acupuncture checklist |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31405367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2624-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxiaoqin reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT chenyaolong reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT liuyali reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT yaoliang reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT estilljanne reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT bianzhaoxiang reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT wutaixiang reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT shanghongcai reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT leemyeongsoo reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT weidang reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT tianjinhui reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT mabin reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT wangyongfeng reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT tianguihua reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist AT yangkehu reportingitemsforsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysesofacupuncturetheprismaforacupuncturechecklist |