Cargando…

Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences

Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms—that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rassi, Elie, Wutz, Andreas, Müller-Voggel, Nadia, Weisz, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817317116
_version_ 1783443119993257984
author Rassi, Elie
Wutz, Andreas
Müller-Voggel, Nadia
Weisz, Nathan
author_facet Rassi, Elie
Wutz, Andreas
Müller-Voggel, Nadia
Weisz, Nathan
author_sort Rassi, Elie
collection PubMed
description Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms—that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluctuations on the content of perception—that is, whether one or another object is perceived. We recorded neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and while participants briefly viewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived interpretation in each trial. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we showed robust decoding of the perceptual report during the poststimulus period. Applying source localization to the classifier weights suggested early recruitment of primary visual cortex (V1) and ∼160-ms recruitment of the category-sensitive fusiform face area (FFA). These poststimulus effects were accompanied by stronger oscillatory power in the gamma frequency band for face vs. vase reports. In prestimulus intervals, we found no differences in oscillatory power between face vs. vase reports in V1 or in FFA, indicating similar levels of neural excitability. Despite this, we found stronger connectivity between V1 and FFA before face reports for low-frequency oscillations. Specifically, the strength of prestimulus feedback connectivity (i.e., Granger causality) from FFA to V1 predicted not only the category of the upcoming percept but also the strength of poststimulus neural activity associated with the percept. Our work shows that prestimulus network states can help shape future processing in category-sensitive brain regions and in this way bias the content of visual experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6689959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66899592019-08-14 Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences Rassi, Elie Wutz, Andreas Müller-Voggel, Nadia Weisz, Nathan Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms—that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluctuations on the content of perception—that is, whether one or another object is perceived. We recorded neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and while participants briefly viewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived interpretation in each trial. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we showed robust decoding of the perceptual report during the poststimulus period. Applying source localization to the classifier weights suggested early recruitment of primary visual cortex (V1) and ∼160-ms recruitment of the category-sensitive fusiform face area (FFA). These poststimulus effects were accompanied by stronger oscillatory power in the gamma frequency band for face vs. vase reports. In prestimulus intervals, we found no differences in oscillatory power between face vs. vase reports in V1 or in FFA, indicating similar levels of neural excitability. Despite this, we found stronger connectivity between V1 and FFA before face reports for low-frequency oscillations. Specifically, the strength of prestimulus feedback connectivity (i.e., Granger causality) from FFA to V1 predicted not only the category of the upcoming percept but also the strength of poststimulus neural activity associated with the percept. Our work shows that prestimulus network states can help shape future processing in category-sensitive brain regions and in this way bias the content of visual experiences. National Academy of Sciences 2019-08-06 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6689959/ /pubmed/31332019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817317116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Rassi, Elie
Wutz, Andreas
Müller-Voggel, Nadia
Weisz, Nathan
Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
title Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
title_full Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
title_fullStr Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
title_full_unstemmed Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
title_short Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
title_sort prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817317116
work_keys_str_mv AT rassielie prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences
AT wutzandreas prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences
AT mullervoggelnadia prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences
AT weisznathan prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences