Cargando…
Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences
Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms—that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817317116 |
_version_ | 1783443119993257984 |
---|---|
author | Rassi, Elie Wutz, Andreas Müller-Voggel, Nadia Weisz, Nathan |
author_facet | Rassi, Elie Wutz, Andreas Müller-Voggel, Nadia Weisz, Nathan |
author_sort | Rassi, Elie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms—that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluctuations on the content of perception—that is, whether one or another object is perceived. We recorded neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and while participants briefly viewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived interpretation in each trial. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we showed robust decoding of the perceptual report during the poststimulus period. Applying source localization to the classifier weights suggested early recruitment of primary visual cortex (V1) and ∼160-ms recruitment of the category-sensitive fusiform face area (FFA). These poststimulus effects were accompanied by stronger oscillatory power in the gamma frequency band for face vs. vase reports. In prestimulus intervals, we found no differences in oscillatory power between face vs. vase reports in V1 or in FFA, indicating similar levels of neural excitability. Despite this, we found stronger connectivity between V1 and FFA before face reports for low-frequency oscillations. Specifically, the strength of prestimulus feedback connectivity (i.e., Granger causality) from FFA to V1 predicted not only the category of the upcoming percept but also the strength of poststimulus neural activity associated with the percept. Our work shows that prestimulus network states can help shape future processing in category-sensitive brain regions and in this way bias the content of visual experiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6689959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66899592019-08-14 Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences Rassi, Elie Wutz, Andreas Müller-Voggel, Nadia Weisz, Nathan Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms—that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluctuations on the content of perception—that is, whether one or another object is perceived. We recorded neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and while participants briefly viewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived interpretation in each trial. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we showed robust decoding of the perceptual report during the poststimulus period. Applying source localization to the classifier weights suggested early recruitment of primary visual cortex (V1) and ∼160-ms recruitment of the category-sensitive fusiform face area (FFA). These poststimulus effects were accompanied by stronger oscillatory power in the gamma frequency band for face vs. vase reports. In prestimulus intervals, we found no differences in oscillatory power between face vs. vase reports in V1 or in FFA, indicating similar levels of neural excitability. Despite this, we found stronger connectivity between V1 and FFA before face reports for low-frequency oscillations. Specifically, the strength of prestimulus feedback connectivity (i.e., Granger causality) from FFA to V1 predicted not only the category of the upcoming percept but also the strength of poststimulus neural activity associated with the percept. Our work shows that prestimulus network states can help shape future processing in category-sensitive brain regions and in this way bias the content of visual experiences. National Academy of Sciences 2019-08-06 2019-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6689959/ /pubmed/31332019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817317116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Biological Sciences Rassi, Elie Wutz, Andreas Müller-Voggel, Nadia Weisz, Nathan Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences |
title | Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences |
title_full | Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences |
title_fullStr | Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences |
title_short | Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences |
title_sort | prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences |
topic | Biological Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6689959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817317116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rassielie prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences AT wutzandreas prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences AT mullervoggelnadia prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences AT weisznathan prestimulusfeedbackconnectivitybiasesthecontentofvisualexperiences |