Cargando…

Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)

Very little is known in broad comparative terms about the nature and content of election campaigns. In this article, we present the first systematic and comparative assessment of the electoral campaigns of candidates having competed in elections across the world along three dimensions: negative camp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerstlé, Jacques, Nai, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323119861875
_version_ 1783443134524424192
author Gerstlé, Jacques
Nai, Alessandro
author_facet Gerstlé, Jacques
Nai, Alessandro
author_sort Gerstlé, Jacques
collection PubMed
description Very little is known in broad comparative terms about the nature and content of election campaigns. In this article, we present the first systematic and comparative assessment of the electoral campaigns of candidates having competed in elections across the world along three dimensions: negative campaigning, emotional campaigning and populist rhetoric. We do so by introducing a new dataset, based on expert judgements, that allows us to retrace the content of campaigns of 97 candidates having competed in 43 elections worldwide between 2016 and 2018. To put the importance of these three dimensions of electoral campaigns into perspective, we comparatively assess the extent to which these three dimensions are more or less likely to capture the attention of news media and to determine the electoral fate of those who rely on them. Our analyses reveal that negativity and emotionality significantly and substantially drive media coverage and electoral results: more positive and enthusiasm-based campaigns increase media attention, but so do campaigns based on personal attacks and fear appeals, especially during presidential elections and when the number of competing candidates is lower. Looking at electoral success, negativity backlashes overall, and yet personal attacks can be used successfully to increase the chances of an electoral victory. Furthermore, both appeals to enthusiasm (but not when a lot of candidates compete) and fear (especially in presidential elections) work as intended to capture the attention of the public and transform it into better electoral fortunes. We also discuss the results of a case study of the 2017 French presidential election, where we compare the campaigns of four leading candidates (Emmanuel Macron, Marine Le Pen, François Fillon and Jean-Luc Mélenchon); results of the case study offer interesting insights to understand the general trends, and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6690035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66900352019-09-16 Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*) Gerstlé, Jacques Nai, Alessandro Eur J Commun Full Length Articles Very little is known in broad comparative terms about the nature and content of election campaigns. In this article, we present the first systematic and comparative assessment of the electoral campaigns of candidates having competed in elections across the world along three dimensions: negative campaigning, emotional campaigning and populist rhetoric. We do so by introducing a new dataset, based on expert judgements, that allows us to retrace the content of campaigns of 97 candidates having competed in 43 elections worldwide between 2016 and 2018. To put the importance of these three dimensions of electoral campaigns into perspective, we comparatively assess the extent to which these three dimensions are more or less likely to capture the attention of news media and to determine the electoral fate of those who rely on them. Our analyses reveal that negativity and emotionality significantly and substantially drive media coverage and electoral results: more positive and enthusiasm-based campaigns increase media attention, but so do campaigns based on personal attacks and fear appeals, especially during presidential elections and when the number of competing candidates is lower. Looking at electoral success, negativity backlashes overall, and yet personal attacks can be used successfully to increase the chances of an electoral victory. Furthermore, both appeals to enthusiasm (but not when a lot of candidates compete) and fear (especially in presidential elections) work as intended to capture the attention of the public and transform it into better electoral fortunes. We also discuss the results of a case study of the 2017 French presidential election, where we compare the campaigns of four leading candidates (Emmanuel Macron, Marine Le Pen, François Fillon and Jean-Luc Mélenchon); results of the case study offer interesting insights to understand the general trends, and beyond. SAGE Publications 2019-07-16 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6690035/ /pubmed/31534293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323119861875 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Full Length Articles
Gerstlé, Jacques
Nai, Alessandro
Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)
title Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)
title_full Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)
title_fullStr Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)
title_full_unstemmed Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)
title_short Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)
title_sort negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success(*)
topic Full Length Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323119861875
work_keys_str_mv AT gerstlejacques negativityemotionalityandpopulistrhetoricinelectioncampaignsworldwideandtheireffectsonmediaattentionandelectoralsuccess
AT naialessandro negativityemotionalityandpopulistrhetoricinelectioncampaignsworldwideandtheireffectsonmediaattentionandelectoralsuccess