Cargando…

Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study

INTRODUCTION: Favorable short-term outcomes have been reported following muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD), a less invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). However, there are no reports of mid- to long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatta, Yoichiro, Tonomura, Hitoshi, Nagae, Masateru, Takatori, Ryota, Mikami, Yasuo, Kubo, Toshikazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435552
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0097
_version_ 1783443150813003776
author Hatta, Yoichiro
Tonomura, Hitoshi
Nagae, Masateru
Takatori, Ryota
Mikami, Yasuo
Kubo, Toshikazu
author_facet Hatta, Yoichiro
Tonomura, Hitoshi
Nagae, Masateru
Takatori, Ryota
Mikami, Yasuo
Kubo, Toshikazu
author_sort Hatta, Yoichiro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Favorable short-term outcomes have been reported following muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD), a less invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). However, there are no reports of mid- to long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes five or more years after treatment of LSCS with MILD. METHODS: Subjects were 84 cases with LSCS (44 males; mean age, 68.7 years) examined five or more years after MILD. All patients had leg pain symptoms, with claudication and/or radicular pain. The patients were divided into three groups depending on the spinal deformity: 44 cases were without deformity (N group); 20 had degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS group); and 20 had degenerative scoliosis (DLS group). The clinical evaluation was performed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and revision surgeries were examined. Changes in lumbar alignment and stability were evaluated using plain radiographs. RESULTS: The overall JOA score recovery rate was 65.5% at final follow-up. The recovery rate was 69.5% in the N group, 65.2% in the DS group, and 54.0% in the DLS group, with the rate of the DLS group being significantly lower. There were 16 revision surgery cases (19.0%): seven in the N group (15.9%), three in the DS group (15.0%) and six in the DLS group (30.0%). There were no significant differences between pre- and postoperative total lumbar alignment or dynamic intervertebral angle in any of the groups, slip percentage in the DS group, or Cobb angle in the DLS group. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-term clinical results of MILD were satisfactory, including in cases with deformity, and there was no major impact on radiologic lumbar alignment or stability. The clinical outcomes of cases with degenerative scoliosis were significantly less favorable and the revision rate was high. This should be taken into consideration when deciding on the surgical procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6690127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66901272019-08-21 Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study Hatta, Yoichiro Tonomura, Hitoshi Nagae, Masateru Takatori, Ryota Mikami, Yasuo Kubo, Toshikazu Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Favorable short-term outcomes have been reported following muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD), a less invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). However, there are no reports of mid- to long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes five or more years after treatment of LSCS with MILD. METHODS: Subjects were 84 cases with LSCS (44 males; mean age, 68.7 years) examined five or more years after MILD. All patients had leg pain symptoms, with claudication and/or radicular pain. The patients were divided into three groups depending on the spinal deformity: 44 cases were without deformity (N group); 20 had degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS group); and 20 had degenerative scoliosis (DLS group). The clinical evaluation was performed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and revision surgeries were examined. Changes in lumbar alignment and stability were evaluated using plain radiographs. RESULTS: The overall JOA score recovery rate was 65.5% at final follow-up. The recovery rate was 69.5% in the N group, 65.2% in the DS group, and 54.0% in the DLS group, with the rate of the DLS group being significantly lower. There were 16 revision surgery cases (19.0%): seven in the N group (15.9%), three in the DS group (15.0%) and six in the DLS group (30.0%). There were no significant differences between pre- and postoperative total lumbar alignment or dynamic intervertebral angle in any of the groups, slip percentage in the DS group, or Cobb angle in the DLS group. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-term clinical results of MILD were satisfactory, including in cases with deformity, and there was no major impact on radiologic lumbar alignment or stability. The clinical outcomes of cases with degenerative scoliosis were significantly less favorable and the revision rate was high. This should be taken into consideration when deciding on the surgical procedure. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6690127/ /pubmed/31435552 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0097 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hatta, Yoichiro
Tonomura, Hitoshi
Nagae, Masateru
Takatori, Ryota
Mikami, Yasuo
Kubo, Toshikazu
Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
title Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
title_short Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study
title_sort clinical outcome of muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (mild) for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: minimum 5-year follow-up study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435552
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0097
work_keys_str_mv AT hattayoichiro clinicaloutcomeofmusclepreservinginterlaminardecompressionmildforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisminimum5yearfollowupstudy
AT tonomurahitoshi clinicaloutcomeofmusclepreservinginterlaminardecompressionmildforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisminimum5yearfollowupstudy
AT nagaemasateru clinicaloutcomeofmusclepreservinginterlaminardecompressionmildforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisminimum5yearfollowupstudy
AT takatoriryota clinicaloutcomeofmusclepreservinginterlaminardecompressionmildforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisminimum5yearfollowupstudy
AT mikamiyasuo clinicaloutcomeofmusclepreservinginterlaminardecompressionmildforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisminimum5yearfollowupstudy
AT kubotoshikazu clinicaloutcomeofmusclepreservinginterlaminardecompressionmildforlumbarspinalcanalstenosisminimum5yearfollowupstudy