Cargando…
Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data
A novel Bayesian modeling framework for response accuracy (RA), response times (RTs) and other process data is proposed. In a Bayesian covariance structure modeling approach, nested and crossed dependences within test-taker data (e.g., within a testlet, between RAs and RTs for an item) are explicitl...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01675 |
_version_ | 1783443163303641088 |
---|---|
author | Klotzke, Konrad Fox, Jean-Paul |
author_facet | Klotzke, Konrad Fox, Jean-Paul |
author_sort | Klotzke, Konrad |
collection | PubMed |
description | A novel Bayesian modeling framework for response accuracy (RA), response times (RTs) and other process data is proposed. In a Bayesian covariance structure modeling approach, nested and crossed dependences within test-taker data (e.g., within a testlet, between RAs and RTs for an item) are explicitly modeled. The local dependences are modeled directly through covariance parameters in an additive covariance matrix. The inclusion of random effects (on person or group level) is not necessary, which allows constructing parsimonious models for responses and multiple types of process data. Bayesian Covariance Structure Models (BCSMs) are presented for various well-known dependence structures. Through truncated shifted inverse-gamma priors, closed-form expressions for the conditional posteriors of the covariance parameters are derived. The priors avoid boundary effects at zero, and ensure the positive definiteness of the additive covariance structure at any layer. Dependences of categorical outcome data are modeled through latent continuous variables. In a simulation study, a BCSM for RAs and RTs is compared to van der Linden's hierarchical model (LHM; van der Linden, 2007). Under the BCSM, the dependence structure is extended to allow variations in test-takers' working speed and ability and is estimated with a satisfying performance. Under the LHM, the assumption of local independence is violated, which results in a biased estimate of the variance of the ability distribution. Moreover, the BCSM provides insight in changes in the speed-accuracy trade-off. With an empirical example, the flexibility and relevance of the BCSM for complex dependence structures in a real-world setting are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6690231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66902312019-08-19 Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data Klotzke, Konrad Fox, Jean-Paul Front Psychol Psychology A novel Bayesian modeling framework for response accuracy (RA), response times (RTs) and other process data is proposed. In a Bayesian covariance structure modeling approach, nested and crossed dependences within test-taker data (e.g., within a testlet, between RAs and RTs for an item) are explicitly modeled. The local dependences are modeled directly through covariance parameters in an additive covariance matrix. The inclusion of random effects (on person or group level) is not necessary, which allows constructing parsimonious models for responses and multiple types of process data. Bayesian Covariance Structure Models (BCSMs) are presented for various well-known dependence structures. Through truncated shifted inverse-gamma priors, closed-form expressions for the conditional posteriors of the covariance parameters are derived. The priors avoid boundary effects at zero, and ensure the positive definiteness of the additive covariance structure at any layer. Dependences of categorical outcome data are modeled through latent continuous variables. In a simulation study, a BCSM for RAs and RTs is compared to van der Linden's hierarchical model (LHM; van der Linden, 2007). Under the BCSM, the dependence structure is extended to allow variations in test-takers' working speed and ability and is estimated with a satisfying performance. Under the LHM, the assumption of local independence is violated, which results in a biased estimate of the variance of the ability distribution. Moreover, the BCSM provides insight in changes in the speed-accuracy trade-off. With an empirical example, the flexibility and relevance of the BCSM for complex dependence structures in a real-world setting are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6690231/ /pubmed/31428007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01675 Text en Copyright © 2019 Klotzke and Fox. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Klotzke, Konrad Fox, Jean-Paul Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data |
title | Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data |
title_full | Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data |
title_fullStr | Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data |
title_short | Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data |
title_sort | bayesian covariance structure modeling of responses and process data |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klotzkekonrad bayesiancovariancestructuremodelingofresponsesandprocessdata AT foxjeanpaul bayesiancovariancestructuremodelingofresponsesandprocessdata |