Cargando…
Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been growing interest in using smartphone applications to assess gait speed and quantify isometric core stability exercise intensity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the between-session reliability and minimal detectable change of a smartphone app for two...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413933 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7485 |
_version_ | 1783443178497507328 |
---|---|
author | Guillén-Rogel, Paloma Franco-Escudero, Cristina Marín, Pedro J. |
author_facet | Guillén-Rogel, Paloma Franco-Escudero, Cristina Marín, Pedro J. |
author_sort | Guillén-Rogel, Paloma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been growing interest in using smartphone applications to assess gait speed and quantify isometric core stability exercise intensity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the between-session reliability and minimal detectable change of a smartphone app for two dynamic exercise tests of the lumbopelvic complex. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy young and active students (age: 22.3 ± 5.9 years, body weight: 66.9 ± 11.3 kg, height: 167.8 ± 10.3 cm) participated in this study. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (%CV), and Bland–Altman plots were used to verify the reliability of the test. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable difference (MDD) were calculated for clinical applicability. RESULTS: The ICCs ranged from 0.73 to 0.96, with low variation (0.9% to 4.8%) between days of assessments. The Bland–Altman plots and one-sample t-tests (p > 0.05) indicated that no dynamic exercise tests changed systematically. Our analyses showed that SEM 0.6 to 1.5 mm/s-2) and MDD (2.1 to 3.5 mm/s-2). CONCLUSION: The OCTOcore app is a reliable tool to assess core stability for two dynamic exercises. A minimal change of 3.5 mm/s-2 is needed to be confident that the change is not a measurement error between two sessions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6690332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66903322019-08-14 Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises Guillén-Rogel, Paloma Franco-Escudero, Cristina Marín, Pedro J. PeerJ Kinesiology BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been growing interest in using smartphone applications to assess gait speed and quantify isometric core stability exercise intensity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the between-session reliability and minimal detectable change of a smartphone app for two dynamic exercise tests of the lumbopelvic complex. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy young and active students (age: 22.3 ± 5.9 years, body weight: 66.9 ± 11.3 kg, height: 167.8 ± 10.3 cm) participated in this study. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (%CV), and Bland–Altman plots were used to verify the reliability of the test. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable difference (MDD) were calculated for clinical applicability. RESULTS: The ICCs ranged from 0.73 to 0.96, with low variation (0.9% to 4.8%) between days of assessments. The Bland–Altman plots and one-sample t-tests (p > 0.05) indicated that no dynamic exercise tests changed systematically. Our analyses showed that SEM 0.6 to 1.5 mm/s-2) and MDD (2.1 to 3.5 mm/s-2). CONCLUSION: The OCTOcore app is a reliable tool to assess core stability for two dynamic exercises. A minimal change of 3.5 mm/s-2 is needed to be confident that the change is not a measurement error between two sessions. PeerJ Inc. 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6690332/ /pubmed/31413933 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7485 Text en ©2019 Guillén-Rogel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Kinesiology Guillén-Rogel, Paloma Franco-Escudero, Cristina Marín, Pedro J. Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises |
title | Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises |
title_full | Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises |
title_fullStr | Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises |
title_full_unstemmed | Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises |
title_short | Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises |
title_sort | test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises |
topic | Kinesiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413933 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guillenrogelpaloma testretestreliabilityofasmartphoneappformeasuringcorestabilityfortwodynamicexercises AT francoescuderocristina testretestreliabilityofasmartphoneappformeasuringcorestabilityfortwodynamicexercises AT marinpedroj testretestreliabilityofasmartphoneappformeasuringcorestabilityfortwodynamicexercises |