Cargando…

Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises

BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been growing interest in using smartphone applications to assess gait speed and quantify isometric core stability exercise intensity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the between-session reliability and minimal detectable change of a smartphone app for two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guillén-Rogel, Paloma, Franco-Escudero, Cristina, Marín, Pedro J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413933
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7485
_version_ 1783443178497507328
author Guillén-Rogel, Paloma
Franco-Escudero, Cristina
Marín, Pedro J.
author_facet Guillén-Rogel, Paloma
Franco-Escudero, Cristina
Marín, Pedro J.
author_sort Guillén-Rogel, Paloma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been growing interest in using smartphone applications to assess gait speed and quantify isometric core stability exercise intensity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the between-session reliability and minimal detectable change of a smartphone app for two dynamic exercise tests of the lumbopelvic complex. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy young and active students (age: 22.3 ± 5.9 years, body weight: 66.9 ± 11.3 kg, height: 167.8 ± 10.3 cm) participated in this study. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (%CV), and Bland–Altman plots were used to verify the reliability of the test. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable difference (MDD) were calculated for clinical applicability. RESULTS: The ICCs ranged from 0.73 to 0.96, with low variation (0.9% to 4.8%) between days of assessments. The Bland–Altman plots and one-sample t-tests (p > 0.05) indicated that no dynamic exercise tests changed systematically. Our analyses showed that SEM 0.6 to 1.5 mm/s-2) and MDD (2.1 to 3.5 mm/s-2). CONCLUSION: The OCTOcore app is a reliable tool to assess core stability for two dynamic exercises. A minimal change of 3.5 mm/s-2 is needed to be confident that the change is not a measurement error between two sessions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6690332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66903322019-08-14 Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises Guillén-Rogel, Paloma Franco-Escudero, Cristina Marín, Pedro J. PeerJ Kinesiology BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been growing interest in using smartphone applications to assess gait speed and quantify isometric core stability exercise intensity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the between-session reliability and minimal detectable change of a smartphone app for two dynamic exercise tests of the lumbopelvic complex. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy young and active students (age: 22.3 ± 5.9 years, body weight: 66.9 ± 11.3 kg, height: 167.8 ± 10.3 cm) participated in this study. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (%CV), and Bland–Altman plots were used to verify the reliability of the test. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable difference (MDD) were calculated for clinical applicability. RESULTS: The ICCs ranged from 0.73 to 0.96, with low variation (0.9% to 4.8%) between days of assessments. The Bland–Altman plots and one-sample t-tests (p > 0.05) indicated that no dynamic exercise tests changed systematically. Our analyses showed that SEM 0.6 to 1.5 mm/s-2) and MDD (2.1 to 3.5 mm/s-2). CONCLUSION: The OCTOcore app is a reliable tool to assess core stability for two dynamic exercises. A minimal change of 3.5 mm/s-2 is needed to be confident that the change is not a measurement error between two sessions. PeerJ Inc. 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6690332/ /pubmed/31413933 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7485 Text en ©2019 Guillén-Rogel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Kinesiology
Guillén-Rogel, Paloma
Franco-Escudero, Cristina
Marín, Pedro J.
Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
title Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
title_full Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
title_fullStr Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
title_full_unstemmed Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
title_short Test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
title_sort test-retest reliability of a smartphone app for measuring core stability for two dynamic exercises
topic Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413933
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7485
work_keys_str_mv AT guillenrogelpaloma testretestreliabilityofasmartphoneappformeasuringcorestabilityfortwodynamicexercises
AT francoescuderocristina testretestreliabilityofasmartphoneappformeasuringcorestabilityfortwodynamicexercises
AT marinpedroj testretestreliabilityofasmartphoneappformeasuringcorestabilityfortwodynamicexercises