Cargando…

Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are being increasingly used to test a range of interventions, including medical interventions commonly used in clinical practice. Policies created by the NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require the reporting of demographics and the examinat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Starks, Monique Anderson, Sanders, Gillian D., Coeytaux, Remy Rene, Riley, Isaretta L., Jackson, Larry R., Brooks, Amanda McBroom, Thomas, Kevin L., Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy, Califf, Robert M., Hernandez, Adrian F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219894
_version_ 1783443201404698624
author Starks, Monique Anderson
Sanders, Gillian D.
Coeytaux, Remy Rene
Riley, Isaretta L.
Jackson, Larry R.
Brooks, Amanda McBroom
Thomas, Kevin L.
Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy
Califf, Robert M.
Hernandez, Adrian F.
author_facet Starks, Monique Anderson
Sanders, Gillian D.
Coeytaux, Remy Rene
Riley, Isaretta L.
Jackson, Larry R.
Brooks, Amanda McBroom
Thomas, Kevin L.
Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy
Califf, Robert M.
Hernandez, Adrian F.
author_sort Starks, Monique Anderson
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are being increasingly used to test a range of interventions, including medical interventions commonly used in clinical practice. Policies created by the NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require the reporting of demographics and the examination of demographic heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) for individually randomized trials. Little is known about how frequent demographics are reported and HTE analyses are conducted in CRTs. OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand the prevalence of HTE analyses and the statistical methods used to conduct them in CRTs focused on treating cardiovascular disease, cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases. Additionally, we also report on the proportion of CRTs that reported on baseline demographics of its populations and conducted demographic HTE analyses. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed and Embase for CRTs published between 1/1/2010 and 3/29/2016 that focused on treating the top 3 Center for Disease Control causes of death (cardiovascular disease, chronic lower respiratory disease, and cancer). Evidence Screening And Review: Of 1,682 unique titles, 117 abstracts were screened. After excluding 53 articles, we included 64 CRT publications and abstracted information on study characteristics and demographic information, statistical analysis, HTE analysis, and study quality. RESULTS: Age and sex were reported in greater than 95.3% of CRTs, while race and ethnicity were reported in only 20.3% of CRTs. HTE analyses were conducted in 28.1% (n = 18) of included CRTs and 77.8% (n = 12) were prespecified analyses. Four CRTs conducted a demographic subgroup analysis. Only 6/18 CRTs used interaction testing to determine whether HTE existed. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline demographic reporting was high for age and sex in CRTs, but was uncommon for race and ethnicity. HTE analyses were uncommon and was rare for demographic subgroups, which limits the ability to examine the extent of benefits or risks for treatments tested with CRT designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6690528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66905282019-08-15 Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review Starks, Monique Anderson Sanders, Gillian D. Coeytaux, Remy Rene Riley, Isaretta L. Jackson, Larry R. Brooks, Amanda McBroom Thomas, Kevin L. Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy Califf, Robert M. Hernandez, Adrian F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are being increasingly used to test a range of interventions, including medical interventions commonly used in clinical practice. Policies created by the NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) require the reporting of demographics and the examination of demographic heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) for individually randomized trials. Little is known about how frequent demographics are reported and HTE analyses are conducted in CRTs. OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand the prevalence of HTE analyses and the statistical methods used to conduct them in CRTs focused on treating cardiovascular disease, cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases. Additionally, we also report on the proportion of CRTs that reported on baseline demographics of its populations and conducted demographic HTE analyses. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed and Embase for CRTs published between 1/1/2010 and 3/29/2016 that focused on treating the top 3 Center for Disease Control causes of death (cardiovascular disease, chronic lower respiratory disease, and cancer). Evidence Screening And Review: Of 1,682 unique titles, 117 abstracts were screened. After excluding 53 articles, we included 64 CRT publications and abstracted information on study characteristics and demographic information, statistical analysis, HTE analysis, and study quality. RESULTS: Age and sex were reported in greater than 95.3% of CRTs, while race and ethnicity were reported in only 20.3% of CRTs. HTE analyses were conducted in 28.1% (n = 18) of included CRTs and 77.8% (n = 12) were prespecified analyses. Four CRTs conducted a demographic subgroup analysis. Only 6/18 CRTs used interaction testing to determine whether HTE existed. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline demographic reporting was high for age and sex in CRTs, but was uncommon for race and ethnicity. HTE analyses were uncommon and was rare for demographic subgroups, which limits the ability to examine the extent of benefits or risks for treatments tested with CRT designs. Public Library of Science 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6690528/ /pubmed/31404063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219894 Text en © 2019 Starks et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Starks, Monique Anderson
Sanders, Gillian D.
Coeytaux, Remy Rene
Riley, Isaretta L.
Jackson, Larry R.
Brooks, Amanda McBroom
Thomas, Kevin L.
Choudhury, Kingshuk Roy
Califf, Robert M.
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review
title Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review
title_full Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review
title_fullStr Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review
title_short Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: A systematic review
title_sort assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses in health-related cluster randomized trials: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219894
work_keys_str_mv AT starksmoniqueanderson assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT sandersgilliand assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT coeytauxremyrene assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT rileyisarettal assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT jacksonlarryr assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT brooksamandamcbroom assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT thomaskevinl assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT choudhurykingshukroy assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT califfrobertm assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview
AT hernandezadrianf assessingheterogeneityoftreatmenteffectanalysesinhealthrelatedclusterrandomizedtrialsasystematicreview