Cargando…
Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions
Justice systems delegate punishment decisions to groups in the belief that the aggregation of individuals’ preferences facilitates judiciousness. However, group dynamics may also lead individuals to relinquish moral responsibility by conforming to the majority’s preference for punishment. Across fiv...
Autores principales: | Son, Jae-Young, Bhandari, Apoorva, FeldmanHall, Oriel |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6690944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48050-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Why we don’t always punish: Preferences for non-punitive responses to moral violations
por: Heffner, Joseph, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators
por: Mattan, Bradley D., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Punitive preferences, monetary incentives and tacit coordination in the punishment of defectors promote cooperation in humans
por: Diekmann, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself
por: FeldmanHall, Oriel, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action
por: FeldmanHall, Oriel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)