Cargando…
Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field
Standard automated perimetry (SAP), the most common form of perimetry used in clinical practice, is associated with high test variability, impacting clinical decision making and efficiency. Contrast sensitivity isocontours (CSIs) may reduce test variability in SAP by identifying regions of the visua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48026-2 |
_version_ | 1783443276622200832 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Agnes Y. J. Nivison-Smith, Lisa Phu, Jack Zangerl, Barbara Khuu, Sieu K. Jones, Bryan W. Pfeiffer, Rebecca L. Marc, Robert E. Kalloniatis, Michael |
author_facet | Choi, Agnes Y. J. Nivison-Smith, Lisa Phu, Jack Zangerl, Barbara Khuu, Sieu K. Jones, Bryan W. Pfeiffer, Rebecca L. Marc, Robert E. Kalloniatis, Michael |
author_sort | Choi, Agnes Y. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Standard automated perimetry (SAP), the most common form of perimetry used in clinical practice, is associated with high test variability, impacting clinical decision making and efficiency. Contrast sensitivity isocontours (CSIs) may reduce test variability in SAP by identifying regions of the visual field with statistically similar patterns of change that can be analysed collectively and allow a point (disease)-to-CSI (normal) comparison in disease assessment as opposed to a point (disease)-to-point (normal) comparison. CSIs in the central visual field however have limited applicability as they have only been described using visual field test patterns with low, 6° spatial sampling. In this study, CSIs were determined within the central 20° visual field using the 10-2 test grid paradigm of the Humphrey Field Analyzer which has a high 2° sampling frequency. The number of CSIs detected in the central 20° visual field was greater than previously reported with low spatial sampling and stimulus size dependent: 6 CSIs for GI, 4 CSIs for GII and GIII, and 3 CSIs for GIV and GV. CSI number and distribution were preserved with age. Use of CSIs to assess visual function in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) found CSI guided analysis detected a significantly greater deviation in sensitivity of AMD eyes from normal compared to a standard clinical pointwise comparison (−1.40 ± 0.15 dB vs −0.96 ± 0.15 dB; p < 0.05). This work suggests detection of CSIs within the central 20° is dependent on sampling strategy and stimulus size and normative distribution limits of CSIs can indicate significant functional deficits in diseases affecting the central visual field such as AMD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6691009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66910092019-08-15 Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field Choi, Agnes Y. J. Nivison-Smith, Lisa Phu, Jack Zangerl, Barbara Khuu, Sieu K. Jones, Bryan W. Pfeiffer, Rebecca L. Marc, Robert E. Kalloniatis, Michael Sci Rep Article Standard automated perimetry (SAP), the most common form of perimetry used in clinical practice, is associated with high test variability, impacting clinical decision making and efficiency. Contrast sensitivity isocontours (CSIs) may reduce test variability in SAP by identifying regions of the visual field with statistically similar patterns of change that can be analysed collectively and allow a point (disease)-to-CSI (normal) comparison in disease assessment as opposed to a point (disease)-to-point (normal) comparison. CSIs in the central visual field however have limited applicability as they have only been described using visual field test patterns with low, 6° spatial sampling. In this study, CSIs were determined within the central 20° visual field using the 10-2 test grid paradigm of the Humphrey Field Analyzer which has a high 2° sampling frequency. The number of CSIs detected in the central 20° visual field was greater than previously reported with low spatial sampling and stimulus size dependent: 6 CSIs for GI, 4 CSIs for GII and GIII, and 3 CSIs for GIV and GV. CSI number and distribution were preserved with age. Use of CSIs to assess visual function in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) found CSI guided analysis detected a significantly greater deviation in sensitivity of AMD eyes from normal compared to a standard clinical pointwise comparison (−1.40 ± 0.15 dB vs −0.96 ± 0.15 dB; p < 0.05). This work suggests detection of CSIs within the central 20° is dependent on sampling strategy and stimulus size and normative distribution limits of CSIs can indicate significant functional deficits in diseases affecting the central visual field such as AMD. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6691009/ /pubmed/31406197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48026-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Choi, Agnes Y. J. Nivison-Smith, Lisa Phu, Jack Zangerl, Barbara Khuu, Sieu K. Jones, Bryan W. Pfeiffer, Rebecca L. Marc, Robert E. Kalloniatis, Michael Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field |
title | Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field |
title_full | Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field |
title_fullStr | Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field |
title_short | Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field |
title_sort | contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48026-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choiagnesyj contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT nivisonsmithlisa contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT phujack contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT zangerlbarbara contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT khuusieuk contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT jonesbryanw contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT pfeifferrebeccal contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT marcroberte contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield AT kalloniatismichael contrastsensitivityisocontoursofthecentralvisualfield |