Cargando…

Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus

The goals of our study were to compare the immune response to different killed and modified live vaccines against PRRS virus and to monitor the antibody production and the cell mediated immunity both at the systemic and local level. In the experiment, we immunized four groups of piglets with two com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toman, Miroslav, Celer, Vladimir, Kavanová, Lenka, Levá, Lenka, Frolichova, Jitka, Ondráčková, Petra, Kudláčková, Hana, Nechvátalová, Kateřina, Salat, Jiri, Faldyna, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01689
_version_ 1783443362649473024
author Toman, Miroslav
Celer, Vladimir
Kavanová, Lenka
Levá, Lenka
Frolichova, Jitka
Ondráčková, Petra
Kudláčková, Hana
Nechvátalová, Kateřina
Salat, Jiri
Faldyna, Martin
author_facet Toman, Miroslav
Celer, Vladimir
Kavanová, Lenka
Levá, Lenka
Frolichova, Jitka
Ondráčková, Petra
Kudláčková, Hana
Nechvátalová, Kateřina
Salat, Jiri
Faldyna, Martin
author_sort Toman, Miroslav
collection PubMed
description The goals of our study were to compare the immune response to different killed and modified live vaccines against PRRS virus and to monitor the antibody production and the cell mediated immunity both at the systemic and local level. In the experiment, we immunized four groups of piglets with two commercial inactivated (A1—Progressis, A2—Suivac) and two modified live vaccines (B3—Amervac, B4—Porcilis). Twenty-one days after the final vaccination, all piglets, including the control non-immunized group (C5), were i.n., infected with the Lelystad strain of PRRS virus. The serum antibody response (IgM and IgG) was the strongest in group A1 followed by two MLV (B3 and B4) groups. Locally, we demonstrated the highest level of IgG antibodies in bronchoalveolar lavages (BALF), and saliva in group A1, whereas low IgA antibody responses in BALF and feces were detected in all groups. We have found virus neutralization antibody at DPV 21 (days post vaccination) and higher levels in all groups including the control at DPI 21 (days post infection). Positive antigen specific cell-mediated response in lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was observed in groups B3 and B4 at DPV 7 and in group B4 at DPV 21 and in all intervals after infection. The IFN-γ producing lymphocytes after antigen stimulation were found in CD4(−)CD8(+) and CD4(+)CD8(+) subsets of all immunized groups 7 days after infection. After infection, there were obvious differences in virus excretion. The virus was detected in all groups of piglets in serum, saliva, and occasionally in feces at DPI 3. Significantly lower virus load was found in groups A1 and B3 at DPI 21. Negative samples appeared at DPI 21 in B3 group in saliva. It can be concluded that antibodies after immunization and infection, and the virus after infection can be detected in all the compartments monitored. Immunization with inactivated vaccine A1—Progressis induces high levels of antibodies produced both systemically and locally. Immunization with MLV-vaccines (Amervac and Porcilis) produces sufficient antibody levels and also cell-mediated immunity. After infection virus secretion gradually decreases in group B3, indicating tendency to induce sterile immunity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6691355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66913552019-08-23 Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus Toman, Miroslav Celer, Vladimir Kavanová, Lenka Levá, Lenka Frolichova, Jitka Ondráčková, Petra Kudláčková, Hana Nechvátalová, Kateřina Salat, Jiri Faldyna, Martin Front Immunol Immunology The goals of our study were to compare the immune response to different killed and modified live vaccines against PRRS virus and to monitor the antibody production and the cell mediated immunity both at the systemic and local level. In the experiment, we immunized four groups of piglets with two commercial inactivated (A1—Progressis, A2—Suivac) and two modified live vaccines (B3—Amervac, B4—Porcilis). Twenty-one days after the final vaccination, all piglets, including the control non-immunized group (C5), were i.n., infected with the Lelystad strain of PRRS virus. The serum antibody response (IgM and IgG) was the strongest in group A1 followed by two MLV (B3 and B4) groups. Locally, we demonstrated the highest level of IgG antibodies in bronchoalveolar lavages (BALF), and saliva in group A1, whereas low IgA antibody responses in BALF and feces were detected in all groups. We have found virus neutralization antibody at DPV 21 (days post vaccination) and higher levels in all groups including the control at DPI 21 (days post infection). Positive antigen specific cell-mediated response in lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was observed in groups B3 and B4 at DPV 7 and in group B4 at DPV 21 and in all intervals after infection. The IFN-γ producing lymphocytes after antigen stimulation were found in CD4(−)CD8(+) and CD4(+)CD8(+) subsets of all immunized groups 7 days after infection. After infection, there were obvious differences in virus excretion. The virus was detected in all groups of piglets in serum, saliva, and occasionally in feces at DPI 3. Significantly lower virus load was found in groups A1 and B3 at DPI 21. Negative samples appeared at DPI 21 in B3 group in saliva. It can be concluded that antibodies after immunization and infection, and the virus after infection can be detected in all the compartments monitored. Immunization with inactivated vaccine A1—Progressis induces high levels of antibodies produced both systemically and locally. Immunization with MLV-vaccines (Amervac and Porcilis) produces sufficient antibody levels and also cell-mediated immunity. After infection virus secretion gradually decreases in group B3, indicating tendency to induce sterile immunity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6691355/ /pubmed/31447829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01689 Text en Copyright © 2019 Toman, Celer, Kavanová, Levá, Frolichova, Ondráčková, Kudláčková, Nechvátalová, Salat and Faldyna. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Toman, Miroslav
Celer, Vladimir
Kavanová, Lenka
Levá, Lenka
Frolichova, Jitka
Ondráčková, Petra
Kudláčková, Hana
Nechvátalová, Kateřina
Salat, Jiri
Faldyna, Martin
Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus
title Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus
title_full Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus
title_fullStr Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus
title_short Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus
title_sort dynamics and differences in systemic and local immune responses after vaccination with inactivated and live commercial vaccines and subsequent subclinical infection with prrs virus
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01689
work_keys_str_mv AT tomanmiroslav dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT celervladimir dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT kavanovalenka dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT levalenka dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT frolichovajitka dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT ondrackovapetra dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT kudlackovahana dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT nechvatalovakaterina dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT salatjiri dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus
AT faldynamartin dynamicsanddifferencesinsystemicandlocalimmuneresponsesaftervaccinationwithinactivatedandlivecommercialvaccinesandsubsequentsubclinicalinfectionwithprrsvirus