Cargando…

Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey

BACKGROUND: Specialist palliative care services have various configurations of staff, processes and interventions, which determine how care is delivered. Currently, there is no consistent way to define and distinguish these different models of care. AIM: To identify the core components that characte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firth, Alice M, O’Brien, Suzanne M, Guo, Ping, Seymour, Jane, Richardson, Heather, Bridges, Christopher, Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B, Grande, Gunn, Dzingina, Mendwas, Higginson, Irene J, Murtagh, Fliss EM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216319858237
_version_ 1783443410327175168
author Firth, Alice M
O’Brien, Suzanne M
Guo, Ping
Seymour, Jane
Richardson, Heather
Bridges, Christopher
Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B
Grande, Gunn
Dzingina, Mendwas
Higginson, Irene J
Murtagh, Fliss EM
author_facet Firth, Alice M
O’Brien, Suzanne M
Guo, Ping
Seymour, Jane
Richardson, Heather
Bridges, Christopher
Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B
Grande, Gunn
Dzingina, Mendwas
Higginson, Irene J
Murtagh, Fliss EM
author_sort Firth, Alice M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Specialist palliative care services have various configurations of staff, processes and interventions, which determine how care is delivered. Currently, there is no consistent way to define and distinguish these different models of care. AIM: To identify the core components that characterise and differentiate existing models of specialist palliative care in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study: (1) semi-structured interviews to identify criteria, (2) two-round Delphi study to rank/refine criteria, and (3) structured interviews to test/refine criteria. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Specialist palliative care stakeholders from hospice inpatient, hospital advisory, and community settings. RESULTS: (1) Semi-structured interviews with 14 clinical leads, from eight UK organisations (five hospice inpatient units, two hospital advisory teams, five community teams), provided 34 preliminary criteria. (2) Delphi study: Round 1 (54 participants): thirty-four criteria presented, seven removed and seven added. Round 2 (30 participants): these 34 criteria were ranked with the 15 highest ranked criteria, including setting, type of care, size of service, diagnoses, disciplines, mode of care, types of interventions, ‘out-of-hours’ components (referrals, times, disciplines, mode of care, type of care), external education, use of measures, bereavement follow-up and complex grief provision. (3) Structured interviews with 21 UK service leads (six hospice inpatients, four hospital advisory and nine community teams) refined the criteria from (1) and (2), and provided four further contextual criteria (team purpose, funding, self-referral acceptance and discharge). CONCLUSION: In this innovative study, we derive 20 criteria to characterise and differentiate models of specialist palliative care – a major paradigm shift to enable accurate reporting and comparison in practice and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6691593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66915932019-09-16 Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey Firth, Alice M O’Brien, Suzanne M Guo, Ping Seymour, Jane Richardson, Heather Bridges, Christopher Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B Grande, Gunn Dzingina, Mendwas Higginson, Irene J Murtagh, Fliss EM Palliat Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Specialist palliative care services have various configurations of staff, processes and interventions, which determine how care is delivered. Currently, there is no consistent way to define and distinguish these different models of care. AIM: To identify the core components that characterise and differentiate existing models of specialist palliative care in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study: (1) semi-structured interviews to identify criteria, (2) two-round Delphi study to rank/refine criteria, and (3) structured interviews to test/refine criteria. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Specialist palliative care stakeholders from hospice inpatient, hospital advisory, and community settings. RESULTS: (1) Semi-structured interviews with 14 clinical leads, from eight UK organisations (five hospice inpatient units, two hospital advisory teams, five community teams), provided 34 preliminary criteria. (2) Delphi study: Round 1 (54 participants): thirty-four criteria presented, seven removed and seven added. Round 2 (30 participants): these 34 criteria were ranked with the 15 highest ranked criteria, including setting, type of care, size of service, diagnoses, disciplines, mode of care, types of interventions, ‘out-of-hours’ components (referrals, times, disciplines, mode of care, type of care), external education, use of measures, bereavement follow-up and complex grief provision. (3) Structured interviews with 21 UK service leads (six hospice inpatients, four hospital advisory and nine community teams) refined the criteria from (1) and (2), and provided four further contextual criteria (team purpose, funding, self-referral acceptance and discharge). CONCLUSION: In this innovative study, we derive 20 criteria to characterise and differentiate models of specialist palliative care – a major paradigm shift to enable accurate reporting and comparison in practice and research. SAGE Publications 2019-06-28 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6691593/ /pubmed/31250704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216319858237 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Firth, Alice M
O’Brien, Suzanne M
Guo, Ping
Seymour, Jane
Richardson, Heather
Bridges, Christopher
Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B
Grande, Gunn
Dzingina, Mendwas
Higginson, Irene J
Murtagh, Fliss EM
Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey
title Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey
title_full Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey
title_fullStr Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey
title_full_unstemmed Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey
title_short Establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: A mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and Delphi survey
title_sort establishing key criteria to define and compare models of specialist palliative care: a mixed-methods study using qualitative interviews and delphi survey
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216319858237
work_keys_str_mv AT firthalicem establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT obriensuzannem establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT guoping establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT seymourjane establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT richardsonheather establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT bridgeschristopher establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT hocaoglumevhibeb establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT grandegunn establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT dzinginamendwas establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT higginsonirenej establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey
AT murtaghflissem establishingkeycriteriatodefineandcomparemodelsofspecialistpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeinterviewsanddelphisurvey