Cargando…
Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls
The process of formulating a good research question can be challenging and frustrating. While a comprehensive literature review is compulsory, the researcher usually encounters methodological difficulties in the conduct of the study, particularly if the primary study question has not been adequately...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462805 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_198_19 |
_version_ | 1783443420562325504 |
---|---|
author | Fandino, Wilson |
author_facet | Fandino, Wilson |
author_sort | Fandino, Wilson |
collection | PubMed |
description | The process of formulating a good research question can be challenging and frustrating. While a comprehensive literature review is compulsory, the researcher usually encounters methodological difficulties in the conduct of the study, particularly if the primary study question has not been adequately selected in accordance with the clinical dilemma that needs to be addressed. Therefore, optimising time and resources before embarking in the design of a clinical protocol can make an impact on the final results of the research project. Researchers have developed effective ways to convey the message of how to build a good research question that can be easily recalled under the acronyms of PICOT (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, and time frame) and FINER (feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant). In line with these concepts, this article highlights the main issues faced by clinicians, when developing a research question. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6691636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66916362019-08-28 Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls Fandino, Wilson Indian J Anaesth Special Article The process of formulating a good research question can be challenging and frustrating. While a comprehensive literature review is compulsory, the researcher usually encounters methodological difficulties in the conduct of the study, particularly if the primary study question has not been adequately selected in accordance with the clinical dilemma that needs to be addressed. Therefore, optimising time and resources before embarking in the design of a clinical protocol can make an impact on the final results of the research project. Researchers have developed effective ways to convey the message of how to build a good research question that can be easily recalled under the acronyms of PICOT (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, and time frame) and FINER (feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant). In line with these concepts, this article highlights the main issues faced by clinicians, when developing a research question. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6691636/ /pubmed/31462805 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_198_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Special Article Fandino, Wilson Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls |
title | Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls |
title_full | Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls |
title_fullStr | Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls |
title_full_unstemmed | Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls |
title_short | Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls |
title_sort | formulating a good research question: pearls and pitfalls |
topic | Special Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462805 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_198_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fandinowilson formulatingagoodresearchquestionpearlsandpitfalls |