Cargando…

Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis

PURPOSE: Despite the success of fractionation in clinical practice to spare healthy tissue, it remains common for mouse models used to study the efficacy of radiation therapy to use minimal or no fractionation. The goal of our study was to create a fractionated mouse model of radiation necrosis that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boria, Andrew J., Perez-Torres, Carlos J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1356-3
_version_ 1783443424105463808
author Boria, Andrew J.
Perez-Torres, Carlos J.
author_facet Boria, Andrew J.
Perez-Torres, Carlos J.
author_sort Boria, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite the success of fractionation in clinical practice to spare healthy tissue, it remains common for mouse models used to study the efficacy of radiation therapy to use minimal or no fractionation. The goal of our study was to create a fractionated mouse model of radiation necrosis that we could compare to our single fraction model. METHODS: Precision X-Ray’s X-Rad 320 cabinet irradiator was used to irradiate the cerebrum of mice with four different fractionation schemes, while a 7 T Bruker magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner using T2 and post-contrast T1 imaging was used to track the development of radiation necrosis over the span of six weeks. RESULTS: All four fractionation schemes with single fraction equivalent doses (SFED) less than 50 Gy for the commonly accepted alpha/beta ratio (α/β) value of 2–3 Gy produced radiation necrosis comparable to what would be achieved with single fraction doses of 80 and 90 Gy. This is surprising when previous work using single fractions of 50 Gy produced no visible radiation necrosis, with the results of this study showing fractionation not sparing brain tissue as much as expected. CONCLUSION: Further interpretation of these results must take into consideration other studies which have shown a lack of sparing when fractionation has been incorporated, as well as consider factors such as the use of large doses per fraction, the time between fractions, and the limitations of using a murine model to analyze the human condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6691651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66916512019-08-15 Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis Boria, Andrew J. Perez-Torres, Carlos J. Radiat Oncol Short Report PURPOSE: Despite the success of fractionation in clinical practice to spare healthy tissue, it remains common for mouse models used to study the efficacy of radiation therapy to use minimal or no fractionation. The goal of our study was to create a fractionated mouse model of radiation necrosis that we could compare to our single fraction model. METHODS: Precision X-Ray’s X-Rad 320 cabinet irradiator was used to irradiate the cerebrum of mice with four different fractionation schemes, while a 7 T Bruker magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner using T2 and post-contrast T1 imaging was used to track the development of radiation necrosis over the span of six weeks. RESULTS: All four fractionation schemes with single fraction equivalent doses (SFED) less than 50 Gy for the commonly accepted alpha/beta ratio (α/β) value of 2–3 Gy produced radiation necrosis comparable to what would be achieved with single fraction doses of 80 and 90 Gy. This is surprising when previous work using single fractions of 50 Gy produced no visible radiation necrosis, with the results of this study showing fractionation not sparing brain tissue as much as expected. CONCLUSION: Further interpretation of these results must take into consideration other studies which have shown a lack of sparing when fractionation has been incorporated, as well as consider factors such as the use of large doses per fraction, the time between fractions, and the limitations of using a murine model to analyze the human condition. BioMed Central 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6691651/ /pubmed/31409408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1356-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Boria, Andrew J.
Perez-Torres, Carlos J.
Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis
title Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis
title_full Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis
title_fullStr Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis
title_full_unstemmed Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis
title_short Minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis
title_sort minimal difference between fractionated and single-fraction exposure in a murine model of radiation necrosis
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1356-3
work_keys_str_mv AT boriaandrewj minimaldifferencebetweenfractionatedandsinglefractionexposureinamurinemodelofradiationnecrosis
AT pereztorrescarlosj minimaldifferencebetweenfractionatedandsinglefractionexposureinamurinemodelofradiationnecrosis