Cargando…
What are considered ‘good facts’?
In the January edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics, Fujita and Tabuchi (hereafter, Authors) responded that we misunderstood the ‘facts’ in our previous article. Our article’s method was twofold. First, it appealed to normative analysis and publicly accessible materials, and second, it targeted...
Autores principales: | Akabayashi, Akira, Nakazawa, Eisuke, Jecker, Nancy S |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30777869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105333 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Endangerment of the iPSC stock project in Japan: on the ethics of public funding policies
por: Akabayashi, Akira, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Autonomy in Japan: What does it Look Like?
por: Akabayashi, Akira, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What Does It Mean to Truly Empathize with a Patient? An Analysis of Japanese Cases Employing the Narrative Approach Perspective
por: Akabayashi, Akira, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Facts and Recommendations regarding When Medical Institutions Report Potential Abuse to Child Guidance Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
por: Urade, Mio, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Would Major Incompatible Blood Type Lung Transplants be Standard Care?
por: Akabayashi, Akira, et al.
Publicado: (2022)