Cargando…
Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
INTRODUCTION: Patch graft erosion and implant exposure is a known complication of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. Recently, electron beam (e-beam) irradiated corneal tissue ha s become available; however, limited data exist on the rates of erosion for e-beam irradiated corneal grafts compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0190-x |
_version_ | 1783443547405418496 |
---|---|
author | Passo, Ross M. Hoskins, Zachary B. Tran, Khoa D. Patzer, Corrina Edmunds, Beth Morrison, John C. Parikh, Mansi Takusagawa, Hana L. Tehrani, Shandiz |
author_facet | Passo, Ross M. Hoskins, Zachary B. Tran, Khoa D. Patzer, Corrina Edmunds, Beth Morrison, John C. Parikh, Mansi Takusagawa, Hana L. Tehrani, Shandiz |
author_sort | Passo, Ross M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patch graft erosion and implant exposure is a known complication of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. Recently, electron beam (e-beam) irradiated corneal tissue ha s become available; however, limited data exist on the rates of erosion for e-beam irradiated corneal grafts compared to traditional scleral grafts after GDD surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study examines the records of 253 eyes from 225 adult subjects who underwent GDD surgery with either e-beam irradiated corneal or scleral grafts at the Casey Eye Institute by five surgeons between April 22, 2014 and October 11, 2017. Surgical procedures and the occurrence of graft erosion were determined using billing codes and verified by manual review of electronic health records. RESULTS: The average age at the time of surgery was 61.3 ± 17.5 years (n = 200) and 60.8 ± 16.8 years (n = 53) for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. The average follow-up time post-surgery was 416 ± 345 days and 495 ± 343 days for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age, follow-up time, and glaucoma diagnosis between the groups; however, the e-beam irradiated cornea group was statistically more likely to have an Ahmed implant as compared to the sclera group. No erosion events were noted in either group. CONCLUSION: e-Beam irradiated corneal grafts were used 3.8 times more frequently relative to scleral grafts, yet there were no cases of graft erosion in either group during the follow-up period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6692416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66924162019-08-26 Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery Passo, Ross M. Hoskins, Zachary B. Tran, Khoa D. Patzer, Corrina Edmunds, Beth Morrison, John C. Parikh, Mansi Takusagawa, Hana L. Tehrani, Shandiz Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patch graft erosion and implant exposure is a known complication of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. Recently, electron beam (e-beam) irradiated corneal tissue ha s become available; however, limited data exist on the rates of erosion for e-beam irradiated corneal grafts compared to traditional scleral grafts after GDD surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study examines the records of 253 eyes from 225 adult subjects who underwent GDD surgery with either e-beam irradiated corneal or scleral grafts at the Casey Eye Institute by five surgeons between April 22, 2014 and October 11, 2017. Surgical procedures and the occurrence of graft erosion were determined using billing codes and verified by manual review of electronic health records. RESULTS: The average age at the time of surgery was 61.3 ± 17.5 years (n = 200) and 60.8 ± 16.8 years (n = 53) for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. The average follow-up time post-surgery was 416 ± 345 days and 495 ± 343 days for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age, follow-up time, and glaucoma diagnosis between the groups; however, the e-beam irradiated cornea group was statistically more likely to have an Ahmed implant as compared to the sclera group. No erosion events were noted in either group. CONCLUSION: e-Beam irradiated corneal grafts were used 3.8 times more frequently relative to scleral grafts, yet there were no cases of graft erosion in either group during the follow-up period. Springer Healthcare 2019-06-06 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6692416/ /pubmed/31172462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0190-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Passo, Ross M. Hoskins, Zachary B. Tran, Khoa D. Patzer, Corrina Edmunds, Beth Morrison, John C. Parikh, Mansi Takusagawa, Hana L. Tehrani, Shandiz Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery |
title | Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery |
title_full | Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery |
title_fullStr | Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery |
title_short | Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery |
title_sort | electron beam irradiated corneal versus gamma-irradiated scleral patch graft erosion rates in glaucoma drainage device surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0190-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT passorossm electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT hoskinszacharyb electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT trankhoad electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT patzercorrina electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT edmundsbeth electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT morrisonjohnc electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT parikhmansi electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT takusagawahanal electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery AT tehranishandiz electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery |