Cargando…

Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery

INTRODUCTION: Patch graft erosion and implant exposure is a known complication of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. Recently, electron beam (e-beam) irradiated corneal tissue ha s become available; however, limited data exist on the rates of erosion for e-beam irradiated corneal grafts compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Passo, Ross M., Hoskins, Zachary B., Tran, Khoa D., Patzer, Corrina, Edmunds, Beth, Morrison, John C., Parikh, Mansi, Takusagawa, Hana L., Tehrani, Shandiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0190-x
_version_ 1783443547405418496
author Passo, Ross M.
Hoskins, Zachary B.
Tran, Khoa D.
Patzer, Corrina
Edmunds, Beth
Morrison, John C.
Parikh, Mansi
Takusagawa, Hana L.
Tehrani, Shandiz
author_facet Passo, Ross M.
Hoskins, Zachary B.
Tran, Khoa D.
Patzer, Corrina
Edmunds, Beth
Morrison, John C.
Parikh, Mansi
Takusagawa, Hana L.
Tehrani, Shandiz
author_sort Passo, Ross M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patch graft erosion and implant exposure is a known complication of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. Recently, electron beam (e-beam) irradiated corneal tissue ha s become available; however, limited data exist on the rates of erosion for e-beam irradiated corneal grafts compared to traditional scleral grafts after GDD surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study examines the records of 253 eyes from 225 adult subjects who underwent GDD surgery with either e-beam irradiated corneal or scleral grafts at the Casey Eye Institute by five surgeons between April 22, 2014 and October 11, 2017. Surgical procedures and the occurrence of graft erosion were determined using billing codes and verified by manual review of electronic health records. RESULTS: The average age at the time of surgery was 61.3 ± 17.5 years (n = 200) and 60.8 ± 16.8 years (n = 53) for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. The average follow-up time post-surgery was 416 ± 345 days and 495 ± 343 days for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age, follow-up time, and glaucoma diagnosis between the groups; however, the e-beam irradiated cornea group was statistically more likely to have an Ahmed implant as compared to the sclera group. No erosion events were noted in either group. CONCLUSION: e-Beam irradiated corneal grafts were used 3.8 times more frequently relative to scleral grafts, yet there were no cases of graft erosion in either group during the follow-up period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6692416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66924162019-08-26 Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery Passo, Ross M. Hoskins, Zachary B. Tran, Khoa D. Patzer, Corrina Edmunds, Beth Morrison, John C. Parikh, Mansi Takusagawa, Hana L. Tehrani, Shandiz Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patch graft erosion and implant exposure is a known complication of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) surgery. Recently, electron beam (e-beam) irradiated corneal tissue ha s become available; however, limited data exist on the rates of erosion for e-beam irradiated corneal grafts compared to traditional scleral grafts after GDD surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study examines the records of 253 eyes from 225 adult subjects who underwent GDD surgery with either e-beam irradiated corneal or scleral grafts at the Casey Eye Institute by five surgeons between April 22, 2014 and October 11, 2017. Surgical procedures and the occurrence of graft erosion were determined using billing codes and verified by manual review of electronic health records. RESULTS: The average age at the time of surgery was 61.3 ± 17.5 years (n = 200) and 60.8 ± 16.8 years (n = 53) for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. The average follow-up time post-surgery was 416 ± 345 days and 495 ± 343 days for the e-beam irradiated cornea and sclera groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age, follow-up time, and glaucoma diagnosis between the groups; however, the e-beam irradiated cornea group was statistically more likely to have an Ahmed implant as compared to the sclera group. No erosion events were noted in either group. CONCLUSION: e-Beam irradiated corneal grafts were used 3.8 times more frequently relative to scleral grafts, yet there were no cases of graft erosion in either group during the follow-up period. Springer Healthcare 2019-06-06 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6692416/ /pubmed/31172462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0190-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Passo, Ross M.
Hoskins, Zachary B.
Tran, Khoa D.
Patzer, Corrina
Edmunds, Beth
Morrison, John C.
Parikh, Mansi
Takusagawa, Hana L.
Tehrani, Shandiz
Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
title Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
title_full Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
title_fullStr Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
title_short Electron Beam Irradiated Corneal Versus Gamma-Irradiated Scleral Patch Graft Erosion Rates in Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery
title_sort electron beam irradiated corneal versus gamma-irradiated scleral patch graft erosion rates in glaucoma drainage device surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31172462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0190-x
work_keys_str_mv AT passorossm electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT hoskinszacharyb electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT trankhoad electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT patzercorrina electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT edmundsbeth electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT morrisonjohnc electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT parikhmansi electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT takusagawahanal electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery
AT tehranishandiz electronbeamirradiatedcornealversusgammairradiatedscleralpatchgrafterosionratesinglaucomadrainagedevicesurgery