Cargando…

Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study (Tilak Study No: TIL-001) was to evaluate the medical modules on the mobile medical application OdySight and compare them to the gold standard tests for visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and Amsler Grid. METHODS: A total of 120 eyes were evaluated in an ope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brucker, Julie, Bhatia, Vinona, Sahel, José-Alain, Girmens, Jean-François, Mohand-Saïd, Saddek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0203-9
_version_ 1783443607547543552
author Brucker, Julie
Bhatia, Vinona
Sahel, José-Alain
Girmens, Jean-François
Mohand-Saïd, Saddek
author_facet Brucker, Julie
Bhatia, Vinona
Sahel, José-Alain
Girmens, Jean-François
Mohand-Saïd, Saddek
author_sort Brucker, Julie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study (Tilak Study No: TIL-001) was to evaluate the medical modules on the mobile medical application OdySight and compare them to the gold standard tests for visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and Amsler Grid. METHODS: A total of 120 eyes were evaluated in an open-label, single-arm, prospective, single-site study during which participants performed monocular, gold standard tests for measuring visual acuity (Sloan Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letter chart at 40 cm testing distance and ETDRS letter chart at 4 m testing distance [40-cm and 4-m ETDRS, respectively), contrast sensitivity (Pelli–Robson contrast sensitivity chart [Pelli–Robson test]), and metamorphopsia/scotoma (Amsler Grid) followed by the respective modules on OdySight (also monocular). During this study, both the distance between the device and the patient’s eye and room illumination were controlled by the examiner. RESULTS: A Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that there was no disagreement between the results of the OdySight visual acuity module and both the 40-cm Sloan ETDRS and 4-m ETDRS tests, with a very low level of bias (0.53 and − 1.53 letters, respectively). The same analysis of contrast sensitivity showed a broader disagreement between the results of the OdySight module and those of the Pelli–Robson test. A McNemar test indicated that there was no significant difference between results obtained by the OdySight Amsler Grid module and those obtained by the paper version for the detection of metamorphopsia and scotoma (p = 1.0 for both). CONCLUSION: The results from the TIL-001 study demonstrate good agreement, overall, between the measurements taken by the near visual acuity module and the Amsler grid module of OdySight as compared to currently used gold standards. The contrast sensitivity module of OdySight will require additional investigation. OdySight could be used for remote monitoring of vision between clinic visits and potentially assist in follow-up planning. FUNDING: Tilak Healthcare funded the study and the Rapid Service Fees. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03457441.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6692804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66928042019-08-26 Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests Brucker, Julie Bhatia, Vinona Sahel, José-Alain Girmens, Jean-François Mohand-Saïd, Saddek Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study (Tilak Study No: TIL-001) was to evaluate the medical modules on the mobile medical application OdySight and compare them to the gold standard tests for visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and Amsler Grid. METHODS: A total of 120 eyes were evaluated in an open-label, single-arm, prospective, single-site study during which participants performed monocular, gold standard tests for measuring visual acuity (Sloan Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letter chart at 40 cm testing distance and ETDRS letter chart at 4 m testing distance [40-cm and 4-m ETDRS, respectively), contrast sensitivity (Pelli–Robson contrast sensitivity chart [Pelli–Robson test]), and metamorphopsia/scotoma (Amsler Grid) followed by the respective modules on OdySight (also monocular). During this study, both the distance between the device and the patient’s eye and room illumination were controlled by the examiner. RESULTS: A Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that there was no disagreement between the results of the OdySight visual acuity module and both the 40-cm Sloan ETDRS and 4-m ETDRS tests, with a very low level of bias (0.53 and − 1.53 letters, respectively). The same analysis of contrast sensitivity showed a broader disagreement between the results of the OdySight module and those of the Pelli–Robson test. A McNemar test indicated that there was no significant difference between results obtained by the OdySight Amsler Grid module and those obtained by the paper version for the detection of metamorphopsia and scotoma (p = 1.0 for both). CONCLUSION: The results from the TIL-001 study demonstrate good agreement, overall, between the measurements taken by the near visual acuity module and the Amsler grid module of OdySight as compared to currently used gold standards. The contrast sensitivity module of OdySight will require additional investigation. OdySight could be used for remote monitoring of vision between clinic visits and potentially assist in follow-up planning. FUNDING: Tilak Healthcare funded the study and the Rapid Service Fees. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03457441. Springer Healthcare 2019-07-25 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6692804/ /pubmed/31346977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0203-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Brucker, Julie
Bhatia, Vinona
Sahel, José-Alain
Girmens, Jean-François
Mohand-Saïd, Saddek
Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests
title Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests
title_full Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests
title_fullStr Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests
title_full_unstemmed Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests
title_short Odysight: A Mobile Medical Application Designed for Remote Monitoring—A Prospective Study Comparison with Standard Clinical Eye Tests
title_sort odysight: a mobile medical application designed for remote monitoring—a prospective study comparison with standard clinical eye tests
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0203-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bruckerjulie odysightamobilemedicalapplicationdesignedforremotemonitoringaprospectivestudycomparisonwithstandardclinicaleyetests
AT bhatiavinona odysightamobilemedicalapplicationdesignedforremotemonitoringaprospectivestudycomparisonwithstandardclinicaleyetests
AT saheljosealain odysightamobilemedicalapplicationdesignedforremotemonitoringaprospectivestudycomparisonwithstandardclinicaleyetests
AT girmensjeanfrancois odysightamobilemedicalapplicationdesignedforremotemonitoringaprospectivestudycomparisonwithstandardclinicaleyetests
AT mohandsaidsaddek odysightamobilemedicalapplicationdesignedforremotemonitoringaprospectivestudycomparisonwithstandardclinicaleyetests