Cargando…
Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study
BACKGROUND: Bone strain index (BSI) is a tool measuring bone strain, derived from dual x-ray photon absorptiometry. It is able to characterise an aspect of bone quality that, joined to the quantity and quality parameters of bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS), permits an accur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0110-9 |
_version_ | 1783443608256380928 |
---|---|
author | Messina, C. Piodi, L. P. Rinaudo, L. Emili, I. Porro, F. Buonomenna, C. Sconfienza, L. M. Vergani, L. Ulivieri, F. M. |
author_facet | Messina, C. Piodi, L. P. Rinaudo, L. Emili, I. Porro, F. Buonomenna, C. Sconfienza, L. M. Vergani, L. Ulivieri, F. M. |
author_sort | Messina, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bone strain index (BSI) is a tool measuring bone strain, derived from dual x-ray photon absorptiometry. It is able to characterise an aspect of bone quality that, joined to the quantity and quality parameters of bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS), permits an accurate definition of fracture risk. As no data are available about BSI precision, our aim was to assess its in vitro reproducibility. METHODS: A Hologic spine phantom was used to perform BSI scans with three different scan modes: fast array (FA), array (A), and high definition (HD). Different soft tissue thicknesses (1, 3, 6 cm) of fresh pork rind layers as a surrogate of abdominal fat were interposed. For each scan mode, the phantom was consecutively scanned 25 times without repositioning. RESULTS: In all scan modes (FA, A, HD) and at every fat thickness, BSI reproducibility was lower than that of BMD. The highest reproducibility was found using HD-mode with 1 cm of pork rind and the lowest one using HD-mode with 6 cm of pork rind. Increasing fat thickness, BSI reproducibility tended to decrease. BSI least significant change appeared to be about three times that of BMD in all modalities and fat thicknesses. Without pork rind superimposition and with 1-cm fat layer, BSI reproducibility was highest with HD-mode; with 3 or 6 cm fat thickness, it was higher with A-mode. CONCLUSIONS: BSI reproducibility was worse than that of BMD, but it is less sensitive to fat thickness increase, similarly to TBS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6692807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66928072019-08-28 Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study Messina, C. Piodi, L. P. Rinaudo, L. Emili, I. Porro, F. Buonomenna, C. Sconfienza, L. M. Vergani, L. Ulivieri, F. M. Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Bone strain index (BSI) is a tool measuring bone strain, derived from dual x-ray photon absorptiometry. It is able to characterise an aspect of bone quality that, joined to the quantity and quality parameters of bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS), permits an accurate definition of fracture risk. As no data are available about BSI precision, our aim was to assess its in vitro reproducibility. METHODS: A Hologic spine phantom was used to perform BSI scans with three different scan modes: fast array (FA), array (A), and high definition (HD). Different soft tissue thicknesses (1, 3, 6 cm) of fresh pork rind layers as a surrogate of abdominal fat were interposed. For each scan mode, the phantom was consecutively scanned 25 times without repositioning. RESULTS: In all scan modes (FA, A, HD) and at every fat thickness, BSI reproducibility was lower than that of BMD. The highest reproducibility was found using HD-mode with 1 cm of pork rind and the lowest one using HD-mode with 6 cm of pork rind. Increasing fat thickness, BSI reproducibility tended to decrease. BSI least significant change appeared to be about three times that of BMD in all modalities and fat thicknesses. Without pork rind superimposition and with 1-cm fat layer, BSI reproducibility was highest with HD-mode; with 3 or 6 cm fat thickness, it was higher with A-mode. CONCLUSIONS: BSI reproducibility was worse than that of BMD, but it is less sensitive to fat thickness increase, similarly to TBS. Springer International Publishing 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6692807/ /pubmed/31410624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0110-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Messina, C. Piodi, L. P. Rinaudo, L. Emili, I. Porro, F. Buonomenna, C. Sconfienza, L. M. Vergani, L. Ulivieri, F. M. Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study |
title | Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study |
title_full | Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study |
title_fullStr | Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study |
title_short | Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study |
title_sort | bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0110-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT messinac bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT piodilp bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT rinaudol bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT emilii bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT porrof bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT buonomennac bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT sconfienzalm bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT verganil bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy AT ulivierifm bonestrainindexreproducibilityandsofttissuethicknessinfluenceadualxrayphotonabsorptiometryphantomstudy |