Cargando…

Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, contrast is contraindicated in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) for diagnosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chien, Chiao-Hsuan, Shih, Fu-Chieh, Chen, Chin-Yu, Chen, Chia-Hui, Wu, Wan-Ling, Mak, Chee-Wai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0364-y
_version_ 1783443616056737792
author Chien, Chiao-Hsuan
Shih, Fu-Chieh
Chen, Chin-Yu
Chen, Chia-Hui
Wu, Wan-Ling
Mak, Chee-Wai
author_facet Chien, Chiao-Hsuan
Shih, Fu-Chieh
Chen, Chin-Yu
Chen, Chia-Hui
Wu, Wan-Ling
Mak, Chee-Wai
author_sort Chien, Chiao-Hsuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, contrast is contraindicated in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) for diagnosis of central PE using CTPA as the gold standard. METHODS: The records of patients with suspected PE seen between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were an acute, central PE confirmed by CTPA and non-enhanced MDCT before contrast injection. Patients with a PE ruled out by CTPA served as a control group. MDCT findings studied were high-attenuation emboli in pulmonary artery (PA), main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm, and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MDCT to detect PE. Wells score of all patients were calculated using data extracted from medical records prior to imaging analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a PE confirmed by CTPA and 32 with a PE ruled out by CTPA were included. Among the three main MDCT findings, high-attenuation emboli in the PA showed best diagnostic performance (Sensitivity 72.9%; Specificity 100%), followed by main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm (sensitivity 46.9%; specificity 90.6%), and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation (sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 78.1%). Given any one or more positive findings on unenhanced MDCT, the sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 71.9% for a diagnosis of PE in patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of a composite measure of unenhanced MDCT findings (0.909) was significantly higher than that of the Wells score (0.688), indicating unenhanced MDCT was reliable for detecting PE than Wells score. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced MDCT is an alternative for the diagnosis of acute central PE when CTPA is not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6692926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66929262019-08-15 Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism Chien, Chiao-Hsuan Shih, Fu-Chieh Chen, Chin-Yu Chen, Chia-Hui Wu, Wan-Ling Mak, Chee-Wai BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, contrast is contraindicated in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) for diagnosis of central PE using CTPA as the gold standard. METHODS: The records of patients with suspected PE seen between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were an acute, central PE confirmed by CTPA and non-enhanced MDCT before contrast injection. Patients with a PE ruled out by CTPA served as a control group. MDCT findings studied were high-attenuation emboli in pulmonary artery (PA), main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm, and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MDCT to detect PE. Wells score of all patients were calculated using data extracted from medical records prior to imaging analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a PE confirmed by CTPA and 32 with a PE ruled out by CTPA were included. Among the three main MDCT findings, high-attenuation emboli in the PA showed best diagnostic performance (Sensitivity 72.9%; Specificity 100%), followed by main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm (sensitivity 46.9%; specificity 90.6%), and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation (sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 78.1%). Given any one or more positive findings on unenhanced MDCT, the sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 71.9% for a diagnosis of PE in patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of a composite measure of unenhanced MDCT findings (0.909) was significantly higher than that of the Wells score (0.688), indicating unenhanced MDCT was reliable for detecting PE than Wells score. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced MDCT is an alternative for the diagnosis of acute central PE when CTPA is not available. BioMed Central 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6692926/ /pubmed/31412797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0364-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chien, Chiao-Hsuan
Shih, Fu-Chieh
Chen, Chin-Yu
Chen, Chia-Hui
Wu, Wan-Ling
Mak, Chee-Wai
Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
title Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
title_full Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
title_fullStr Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
title_full_unstemmed Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
title_short Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
title_sort unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0364-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chienchiaohsuan unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism
AT shihfuchieh unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism
AT chenchinyu unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism
AT chenchiahui unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism
AT wuwanling unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism
AT makcheewai unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism