Cargando…
Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, contrast is contraindicated in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) for diagnosi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0364-y |
_version_ | 1783443616056737792 |
---|---|
author | Chien, Chiao-Hsuan Shih, Fu-Chieh Chen, Chin-Yu Chen, Chia-Hui Wu, Wan-Ling Mak, Chee-Wai |
author_facet | Chien, Chiao-Hsuan Shih, Fu-Chieh Chen, Chin-Yu Chen, Chia-Hui Wu, Wan-Ling Mak, Chee-Wai |
author_sort | Chien, Chiao-Hsuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, contrast is contraindicated in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) for diagnosis of central PE using CTPA as the gold standard. METHODS: The records of patients with suspected PE seen between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were an acute, central PE confirmed by CTPA and non-enhanced MDCT before contrast injection. Patients with a PE ruled out by CTPA served as a control group. MDCT findings studied were high-attenuation emboli in pulmonary artery (PA), main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm, and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MDCT to detect PE. Wells score of all patients were calculated using data extracted from medical records prior to imaging analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a PE confirmed by CTPA and 32 with a PE ruled out by CTPA were included. Among the three main MDCT findings, high-attenuation emboli in the PA showed best diagnostic performance (Sensitivity 72.9%; Specificity 100%), followed by main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm (sensitivity 46.9%; specificity 90.6%), and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation (sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 78.1%). Given any one or more positive findings on unenhanced MDCT, the sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 71.9% for a diagnosis of PE in patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of a composite measure of unenhanced MDCT findings (0.909) was significantly higher than that of the Wells score (0.688), indicating unenhanced MDCT was reliable for detecting PE than Wells score. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced MDCT is an alternative for the diagnosis of acute central PE when CTPA is not available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6692926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66929262019-08-15 Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism Chien, Chiao-Hsuan Shih, Fu-Chieh Chen, Chin-Yu Chen, Chia-Hui Wu, Wan-Ling Mak, Chee-Wai BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, contrast is contraindicated in some patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) for diagnosis of central PE using CTPA as the gold standard. METHODS: The records of patients with suspected PE seen between 2010 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were an acute, central PE confirmed by CTPA and non-enhanced MDCT before contrast injection. Patients with a PE ruled out by CTPA served as a control group. MDCT findings studied were high-attenuation emboli in pulmonary artery (PA), main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm, and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MDCT to detect PE. Wells score of all patients were calculated using data extracted from medical records prior to imaging analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a PE confirmed by CTPA and 32 with a PE ruled out by CTPA were included. Among the three main MDCT findings, high-attenuation emboli in the PA showed best diagnostic performance (Sensitivity 72.9%; Specificity 100%), followed by main PA dilatation > 33.2 mm (sensitivity 46.9%; specificity 90.6%), and peripheral wedge-shaped consolidation (sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 78.1%). Given any one or more positive findings on unenhanced MDCT, the sensitivity was 96.9% and specificity was 71.9% for a diagnosis of PE in patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of a composite measure of unenhanced MDCT findings (0.909) was significantly higher than that of the Wells score (0.688), indicating unenhanced MDCT was reliable for detecting PE than Wells score. CONCLUSIONS: Unenhanced MDCT is an alternative for the diagnosis of acute central PE when CTPA is not available. BioMed Central 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6692926/ /pubmed/31412797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0364-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chien, Chiao-Hsuan Shih, Fu-Chieh Chen, Chin-Yu Chen, Chia-Hui Wu, Wan-Ling Mak, Chee-Wai Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism |
title | Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism |
title_full | Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism |
title_fullStr | Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism |
title_full_unstemmed | Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism |
title_short | Unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism |
title_sort | unenhanced multidetector computed tomography findings in acute central pulmonary embolism |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0364-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chienchiaohsuan unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism AT shihfuchieh unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism AT chenchinyu unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism AT chenchiahui unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism AT wuwanling unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism AT makcheewai unenhancedmultidetectorcomputedtomographyfindingsinacutecentralpulmonaryembolism |