Cargando…

DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness

BACKGROUND: Histological grading of choroid plexus tumors (CPTs) remains the best prognostic tool to distinguish between aggressive choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC) and the more benign choroid plexus papilloma (CPP) or atypical choroid plexus papilloma (aCPP); however, these distinctions can be challe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pienkowska, Malgorzata, Choufani, Sanaa, Turinsky, Andrei L., Guha, Tanya, Merino, Diana M., Novokmet, Ana, Brudno, Michael, Weksberg, Rosanna, Shlien, Adam, Hawkins, Cynthia, Bouffet, Eric, Tabori, Uri, Gilbertson, Richard, Finlay, Jonathan L., Jabado, Nada, Thomas, Christian, Sill, Martin, Capper, David, Hasselblatt, Martin, Malkin, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0708-z
_version_ 1783443618897330176
author Pienkowska, Malgorzata
Choufani, Sanaa
Turinsky, Andrei L.
Guha, Tanya
Merino, Diana M.
Novokmet, Ana
Brudno, Michael
Weksberg, Rosanna
Shlien, Adam
Hawkins, Cynthia
Bouffet, Eric
Tabori, Uri
Gilbertson, Richard
Finlay, Jonathan L.
Jabado, Nada
Thomas, Christian
Sill, Martin
Capper, David
Hasselblatt, Martin
Malkin, David
author_facet Pienkowska, Malgorzata
Choufani, Sanaa
Turinsky, Andrei L.
Guha, Tanya
Merino, Diana M.
Novokmet, Ana
Brudno, Michael
Weksberg, Rosanna
Shlien, Adam
Hawkins, Cynthia
Bouffet, Eric
Tabori, Uri
Gilbertson, Richard
Finlay, Jonathan L.
Jabado, Nada
Thomas, Christian
Sill, Martin
Capper, David
Hasselblatt, Martin
Malkin, David
author_sort Pienkowska, Malgorzata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Histological grading of choroid plexus tumors (CPTs) remains the best prognostic tool to distinguish between aggressive choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC) and the more benign choroid plexus papilloma (CPP) or atypical choroid plexus papilloma (aCPP); however, these distinctions can be challenging. Standard treatment of CPC is very aggressive and often leads to severe damage to the young child’s brain. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between CPC and less aggressive entities (CPP or aCPP) to avoid unnecessary exposure of the young patient to neurotoxic therapy. To better stratify CPTs, we utilized DNA methylation (DNAm) to identify prognostic epigenetic biomarkers for CPCs. METHODS: We obtained DNA methylation profiles of 34 CPTs using the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip from Illumina, and the data was analyzed using the Illumina Genome Studio analysis software. Validation of differentially methylated CpG sites chosen as biomarkers was performed using pyrosequencing analysis on additional 22 CPTs. Sensitivity testing of the CPC DNAm signature was performed on a replication cohort of 61 CPT tumors obtained from Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Germany. RESULTS: Generated genome-wide DNAm profiles of CPTs showed significant differences in DNAm between CPCs and the CPPs or aCPPs. The prediction of clinical outcome could be improved by combining the DNAm profile with the mutational status of TP53. CPCs with homozygous TP53 mutations clustered as a group separate from those carrying a heterozygous TP53 mutation or CPCs with wild type TP53 (TP53-wt) and showed the worst survival outcome. Specific DNAm signatures for CPCs revealed AK1, PER2, and PLSCR4 as potential biomarkers for CPC that can be used to improve molecular stratification for diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that combining specific DNAm signature for CPCs with histological approaches better differentiate aggressive tumors from those that are not life threatening. These findings have important implications for future prognostic risk prediction in clinical disease management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-019-0708-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6692938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66929382019-08-15 DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness Pienkowska, Malgorzata Choufani, Sanaa Turinsky, Andrei L. Guha, Tanya Merino, Diana M. Novokmet, Ana Brudno, Michael Weksberg, Rosanna Shlien, Adam Hawkins, Cynthia Bouffet, Eric Tabori, Uri Gilbertson, Richard Finlay, Jonathan L. Jabado, Nada Thomas, Christian Sill, Martin Capper, David Hasselblatt, Martin Malkin, David Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: Histological grading of choroid plexus tumors (CPTs) remains the best prognostic tool to distinguish between aggressive choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC) and the more benign choroid plexus papilloma (CPP) or atypical choroid plexus papilloma (aCPP); however, these distinctions can be challenging. Standard treatment of CPC is very aggressive and often leads to severe damage to the young child’s brain. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between CPC and less aggressive entities (CPP or aCPP) to avoid unnecessary exposure of the young patient to neurotoxic therapy. To better stratify CPTs, we utilized DNA methylation (DNAm) to identify prognostic epigenetic biomarkers for CPCs. METHODS: We obtained DNA methylation profiles of 34 CPTs using the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip from Illumina, and the data was analyzed using the Illumina Genome Studio analysis software. Validation of differentially methylated CpG sites chosen as biomarkers was performed using pyrosequencing analysis on additional 22 CPTs. Sensitivity testing of the CPC DNAm signature was performed on a replication cohort of 61 CPT tumors obtained from Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Germany. RESULTS: Generated genome-wide DNAm profiles of CPTs showed significant differences in DNAm between CPCs and the CPPs or aCPPs. The prediction of clinical outcome could be improved by combining the DNAm profile with the mutational status of TP53. CPCs with homozygous TP53 mutations clustered as a group separate from those carrying a heterozygous TP53 mutation or CPCs with wild type TP53 (TP53-wt) and showed the worst survival outcome. Specific DNAm signatures for CPCs revealed AK1, PER2, and PLSCR4 as potential biomarkers for CPC that can be used to improve molecular stratification for diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that combining specific DNAm signature for CPCs with histological approaches better differentiate aggressive tumors from those that are not life threatening. These findings have important implications for future prognostic risk prediction in clinical disease management. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-019-0708-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6692938/ /pubmed/31409384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0708-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pienkowska, Malgorzata
Choufani, Sanaa
Turinsky, Andrei L.
Guha, Tanya
Merino, Diana M.
Novokmet, Ana
Brudno, Michael
Weksberg, Rosanna
Shlien, Adam
Hawkins, Cynthia
Bouffet, Eric
Tabori, Uri
Gilbertson, Richard
Finlay, Jonathan L.
Jabado, Nada
Thomas, Christian
Sill, Martin
Capper, David
Hasselblatt, Martin
Malkin, David
DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness
title DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness
title_full DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness
title_fullStr DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness
title_full_unstemmed DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness
title_short DNA methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness
title_sort dna methylation signature is prognostic of choroid plexus tumor aggressiveness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6692938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0708-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pienkowskamalgorzata dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT choufanisanaa dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT turinskyandreil dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT guhatanya dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT merinodianam dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT novokmetana dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT brudnomichael dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT weksbergrosanna dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT shlienadam dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT hawkinscynthia dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT bouffeteric dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT taboriuri dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT gilbertsonrichard dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT finlayjonathanl dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT jabadonada dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT thomaschristian dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT sillmartin dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT capperdavid dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT hasselblattmartin dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness
AT malkindavid dnamethylationsignatureisprognosticofchoroidplexustumoraggressiveness