Cargando…

Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical significance of low-frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy. METHODS: A total of 91 women with stage IA2–IB2 cervical cancer, who were treated with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from January 2009 to D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Huan, Zhou, Can-Kun, Song, Jing, Zhang, Wei-Ying, Wang, Su-Mei, Gu, Yi-Ling, Wang, Kang, Ma, Zhe, Hu, Yan, Xiao, Ai-Min, Wang, Jian-Liu, Wu, Rui-Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1689-2
_version_ 1783443657833054208
author Li, Huan
Zhou, Can-Kun
Song, Jing
Zhang, Wei-Ying
Wang, Su-Mei
Gu, Yi-Ling
Wang, Kang
Ma, Zhe
Hu, Yan
Xiao, Ai-Min
Wang, Jian-Liu
Wu, Rui-Fang
author_facet Li, Huan
Zhou, Can-Kun
Song, Jing
Zhang, Wei-Ying
Wang, Su-Mei
Gu, Yi-Ling
Wang, Kang
Ma, Zhe
Hu, Yan
Xiao, Ai-Min
Wang, Jian-Liu
Wu, Rui-Fang
author_sort Li, Huan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical significance of low-frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy. METHODS: A total of 91 women with stage IA2–IB2 cervical cancer, who were treated with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from January 2009 to December 2012, were enrolled into this study and were randomly divided into two groups: trail group (48 cases) and control group (43 cases). Traditional bladder function training and low-frequency electrical stimulation were conducted in the trail group, while patients in the control group were only treated by traditional bladder training. The general condition, rate of urinary retention, and muscle strength grades of pelvic floor muscle in the perioperative period were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the electrical stimulation group was 10.41%, significantly lower than that in the control group (44.18%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The duration of postoperative fever and use of antibiotics were almost the same between these two groups. Eleven days after surgery, the difference in grades of the pelvic floor muscle between these two groups was not statistically significant. However, 14 days after the operation, grades of the pelvic floor muscle were significantly higher in the trail group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). In addition, although there was no significant difference between the two groups with different parameters (P = 0.782), the incidence of urinary retention was lower in the endorphins analgesia program group than in the neuromuscular repair program group (9.09% < 11.54%). CONCLUSION: Low-frequency electrical stimulation is more effective than conventional intervention in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy. It also intensifies the recovery of pelvic muscle strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6693168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66931682019-08-16 Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation Li, Huan Zhou, Can-Kun Song, Jing Zhang, Wei-Ying Wang, Su-Mei Gu, Yi-Ling Wang, Kang Ma, Zhe Hu, Yan Xiao, Ai-Min Wang, Jian-Liu Wu, Rui-Fang World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical significance of low-frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy. METHODS: A total of 91 women with stage IA2–IB2 cervical cancer, who were treated with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from January 2009 to December 2012, were enrolled into this study and were randomly divided into two groups: trail group (48 cases) and control group (43 cases). Traditional bladder function training and low-frequency electrical stimulation were conducted in the trail group, while patients in the control group were only treated by traditional bladder training. The general condition, rate of urinary retention, and muscle strength grades of pelvic floor muscle in the perioperative period were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the electrical stimulation group was 10.41%, significantly lower than that in the control group (44.18%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The duration of postoperative fever and use of antibiotics were almost the same between these two groups. Eleven days after surgery, the difference in grades of the pelvic floor muscle between these two groups was not statistically significant. However, 14 days after the operation, grades of the pelvic floor muscle were significantly higher in the trail group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). In addition, although there was no significant difference between the two groups with different parameters (P = 0.782), the incidence of urinary retention was lower in the endorphins analgesia program group than in the neuromuscular repair program group (9.09% < 11.54%). CONCLUSION: Low-frequency electrical stimulation is more effective than conventional intervention in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy. It also intensifies the recovery of pelvic muscle strength. BioMed Central 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6693168/ /pubmed/31409355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1689-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Huan
Zhou, Can-Kun
Song, Jing
Zhang, Wei-Ying
Wang, Su-Mei
Gu, Yi-Ling
Wang, Kang
Ma, Zhe
Hu, Yan
Xiao, Ai-Min
Wang, Jian-Liu
Wu, Rui-Fang
Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation
title Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation
title_full Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation
title_fullStr Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation
title_full_unstemmed Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation
title_short Curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation
title_sort curative efficacy of low frequency electrical stimulation in preventing urinary retention after cervical cancer operation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1689-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lihuan curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT zhoucankun curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT songjing curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT zhangweiying curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT wangsumei curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT guyiling curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT wangkang curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT mazhe curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT huyan curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT xiaoaimin curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT wangjianliu curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation
AT wuruifang curativeefficacyoflowfrequencyelectricalstimulationinpreventingurinaryretentionaftercervicalcanceroperation