Cargando…

Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP)

BACKGROUND: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear-prevention programs may be effective in the (secondary) prevention of a subsequent ACL injury, little is known, yet, on their effectiveness and feasibility. This study assesses the effects and implementation capacity of a secondary preventiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niederer, Daniel, Keller, Matthias, Achtnich, Andrea, Akoto, Ralph, Ateschrang, Atesch, Banzer, Winfried, Barié, Alexander, Best, Raymond, Ellermann, Andree, Fischer, Andreas, Guenther, Daniel, Herbort, Mirco, Höher, Jürgen, Janko, Maren, Jung, Tobias M., Krause, Matthias, Petersen, Wolf, Stoffels, Thomas, Stöhr, Amelie, Welsch, Frederic, Stein, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3610-2
_version_ 1783443668694204416
author Niederer, Daniel
Keller, Matthias
Achtnich, Andrea
Akoto, Ralph
Ateschrang, Atesch
Banzer, Winfried
Barié, Alexander
Best, Raymond
Ellermann, Andree
Fischer, Andreas
Guenther, Daniel
Herbort, Mirco
Höher, Jürgen
Janko, Maren
Jung, Tobias M.
Krause, Matthias
Petersen, Wolf
Stoffels, Thomas
Stöhr, Amelie
Welsch, Frederic
Stein, Thomas
author_facet Niederer, Daniel
Keller, Matthias
Achtnich, Andrea
Akoto, Ralph
Ateschrang, Atesch
Banzer, Winfried
Barié, Alexander
Best, Raymond
Ellermann, Andree
Fischer, Andreas
Guenther, Daniel
Herbort, Mirco
Höher, Jürgen
Janko, Maren
Jung, Tobias M.
Krause, Matthias
Petersen, Wolf
Stoffels, Thomas
Stöhr, Amelie
Welsch, Frederic
Stein, Thomas
author_sort Niederer, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear-prevention programs may be effective in the (secondary) prevention of a subsequent ACL injury, little is known, yet, on their effectiveness and feasibility. This study assesses the effects and implementation capacity of a secondary preventive motor-control training (the Stop-X program) after ACL reconstruction. METHODS AND DESIGN: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled, prospective, superiority, two-arm design is adopted. Subsequent patients (18–35 years) with primary arthroscopic unilateral ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring graft are enrolled. Postoperative guideline rehabilitation plus Classic follow-up treatment and guideline rehabilitation plus the Stop-X intervention will be compared. The onset of the Stop-X program as part of the postoperative follow-up treatment is individualized and function based. The participants must be released for the training components. The endpoint is the unrestricted return to sport (RTS) decision. Before (where applicable) reconstruction and after the clearance for the intervention (aimed at 4–8 months post surgery) until the unrestricted RTS decision (but at least until 12 months post surgery), all outcomes will be assessed once a month. Each participant is consequently measured at least five times to a maximum of 12 times. Twelve, 18 and 24 months after the surgery, follow-up-measurements and recurrence monitoring will follow. The primary outcome assessement (normalized knee-separation distance at the Drop Jump Screening Test (DJST)) is followed by the functional secondary outcomes assessements. The latter consist of quality assessments during simple (combined) balance side, balance front and single-leg hops for distance. All hop/jump tests are self-administered and filmed from the frontal view (3-m distance). All videos are transferred using safe big content transfer and subsequently (and blinded) expertly video-rated. Secondary outcomes are questionnaires on patient-reported knee function, kinesiophobia, RTS after ACL injury and training/therapy volume (frequency – intensity – type and time). All questionnaires are completed online using the participants’ pseudonym only. Group allocation is executed randomly. The training intervention (Stop-X arm) consists of self-administered home-based exercises. The exercises are step-wise graduated and follow wound healing and functional restoration criteria. The training frequency for both arms is scheduled to be three times per week, each time for a 30 min duration. The program follows current (secondary) prevention guidelines. Repeated measurements gain-score analyses using analyses of (co-)variance are performed for all outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, identification number DRKS00015313. Registered on 1 October 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6693217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66932172019-08-16 Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP) Niederer, Daniel Keller, Matthias Achtnich, Andrea Akoto, Ralph Ateschrang, Atesch Banzer, Winfried Barié, Alexander Best, Raymond Ellermann, Andree Fischer, Andreas Guenther, Daniel Herbort, Mirco Höher, Jürgen Janko, Maren Jung, Tobias M. Krause, Matthias Petersen, Wolf Stoffels, Thomas Stöhr, Amelie Welsch, Frederic Stein, Thomas Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Although anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear-prevention programs may be effective in the (secondary) prevention of a subsequent ACL injury, little is known, yet, on their effectiveness and feasibility. This study assesses the effects and implementation capacity of a secondary preventive motor-control training (the Stop-X program) after ACL reconstruction. METHODS AND DESIGN: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled, prospective, superiority, two-arm design is adopted. Subsequent patients (18–35 years) with primary arthroscopic unilateral ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring graft are enrolled. Postoperative guideline rehabilitation plus Classic follow-up treatment and guideline rehabilitation plus the Stop-X intervention will be compared. The onset of the Stop-X program as part of the postoperative follow-up treatment is individualized and function based. The participants must be released for the training components. The endpoint is the unrestricted return to sport (RTS) decision. Before (where applicable) reconstruction and after the clearance for the intervention (aimed at 4–8 months post surgery) until the unrestricted RTS decision (but at least until 12 months post surgery), all outcomes will be assessed once a month. Each participant is consequently measured at least five times to a maximum of 12 times. Twelve, 18 and 24 months after the surgery, follow-up-measurements and recurrence monitoring will follow. The primary outcome assessement (normalized knee-separation distance at the Drop Jump Screening Test (DJST)) is followed by the functional secondary outcomes assessements. The latter consist of quality assessments during simple (combined) balance side, balance front and single-leg hops for distance. All hop/jump tests are self-administered and filmed from the frontal view (3-m distance). All videos are transferred using safe big content transfer and subsequently (and blinded) expertly video-rated. Secondary outcomes are questionnaires on patient-reported knee function, kinesiophobia, RTS after ACL injury and training/therapy volume (frequency – intensity – type and time). All questionnaires are completed online using the participants’ pseudonym only. Group allocation is executed randomly. The training intervention (Stop-X arm) consists of self-administered home-based exercises. The exercises are step-wise graduated and follow wound healing and functional restoration criteria. The training frequency for both arms is scheduled to be three times per week, each time for a 30 min duration. The program follows current (secondary) prevention guidelines. Repeated measurements gain-score analyses using analyses of (co-)variance are performed for all outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, identification number DRKS00015313. Registered on 1 October 2018. BioMed Central 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6693217/ /pubmed/31409425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3610-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Niederer, Daniel
Keller, Matthias
Achtnich, Andrea
Akoto, Ralph
Ateschrang, Atesch
Banzer, Winfried
Barié, Alexander
Best, Raymond
Ellermann, Andree
Fischer, Andreas
Guenther, Daniel
Herbort, Mirco
Höher, Jürgen
Janko, Maren
Jung, Tobias M.
Krause, Matthias
Petersen, Wolf
Stoffels, Thomas
Stöhr, Amelie
Welsch, Frederic
Stein, Thomas
Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP)
title Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP)
title_full Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP)
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP)
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP)
title_short Effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (PReP)
title_sort effectiveness of a home-based re-injury prevention program on motor control, return to sport and recurrence rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial (prep)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3610-2
work_keys_str_mv AT niedererdaniel effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT kellermatthias effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT achtnichandrea effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT akotoralph effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT ateschrangatesch effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT banzerwinfried effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT bariealexander effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT bestraymond effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT ellermannandree effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT fischerandreas effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT guentherdaniel effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT herbortmirco effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT hoherjurgen effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT jankomaren effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT jungtobiasm effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT krausematthias effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT petersenwolf effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT stoffelsthomas effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT stohramelie effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT welschfrederic effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep
AT steinthomas effectivenessofahomebasedreinjurypreventionprogramonmotorcontrolreturntosportandrecurrenceratesafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionstudyprotocolforamulticentersingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialprep