Cargando…

Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al

An evaluation of Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) was recently conducted by San Sebastian et al. (BMC Public Health 19:202, 2019). Evaluation of health care interventions of this kind require 1) an understanding of both the design and the nature of the intervention, 2) correct definition of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blomstedt, Yulia, Norberg, Margareta, Ng, Nawi, Nyström, Lennarth, Boman, Kurt, Lönnberg, Göran, Stenlund, Hans, Wall, Stig, Weinehall, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7444-3
Descripción
Sumario:An evaluation of Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) was recently conducted by San Sebastian et al. (BMC Public Health 19:202, 2019). Evaluation of health care interventions of this kind require 1) an understanding of both the design and the nature of the intervention, 2) correct definition of the target population, and 3) careful choice of the appropriate evaluation method. In this correspondence, we review the approach used by San Sebastian et al. as relates to these three criteria. Within this framework, we suggest important explanations for why the conclusions drawn by these authors contradict a large body of research on the effectiveness of the VIP.