Cargando…

On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape

Introduction: This study explores the feasibility of SRS/SRT treatment with MLC leaves wider than 2.5 mm at isocenter by inter-comparing treatment plans produced with 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm leaves for various target sizes and shapes. Materials and methods: Forty previously treated patients were re-pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalbout, Wassim, Abou Zahr, Jana, Youssef, Bassem, Shahine, Bilal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00741
_version_ 1783443689496903680
author Jalbout, Wassim
Abou Zahr, Jana
Youssef, Bassem
Shahine, Bilal
author_facet Jalbout, Wassim
Abou Zahr, Jana
Youssef, Bassem
Shahine, Bilal
author_sort Jalbout, Wassim
collection PubMed
description Introduction: This study explores the feasibility of SRS/SRT treatment with MLC leaves wider than 2.5 mm at isocenter by inter-comparing treatment plans produced with 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm leaves for various target sizes and shapes. Materials and methods: Forty previously treated patients were re-planned using 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm wide MLC leaves. For each patient, all three plans were evaluated and contrasted between them in terms of five metrics: target dose homogeneity, conformity index, organs at risk dose, dose fall off outside the target, and dose to normal tissues. A regularity index RI was introduced that quantified the degree of target shape irregularity. The effect of target size and shape irregularity on feasibility of 5.0 and 10.0 mm leaves was analyzed. Results: Consistent plan degradation was observed for 10.0 mm (sometimes for 5.0 mm) compared to 2.5 mm MLC in terms of the above five plan metrics, but this degradation was small to clinically insignificant. As an exception, when target (PTV) size was smaller than about 1 cm diameter, clinically significant differences were found between 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm MLC. Conclusion: 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC can be used in SRS/SRT for targets (PTV) diameter larger than 1 cm. For smaller targets, 2.5 mm MLC is clinically superior, 5.0 is acceptable and 10.0 mm MLC is discouraged in terms of PTV dose conformity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6693311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66933112019-08-22 On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape Jalbout, Wassim Abou Zahr, Jana Youssef, Bassem Shahine, Bilal Front Oncol Oncology Introduction: This study explores the feasibility of SRS/SRT treatment with MLC leaves wider than 2.5 mm at isocenter by inter-comparing treatment plans produced with 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm leaves for various target sizes and shapes. Materials and methods: Forty previously treated patients were re-planned using 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm wide MLC leaves. For each patient, all three plans were evaluated and contrasted between them in terms of five metrics: target dose homogeneity, conformity index, organs at risk dose, dose fall off outside the target, and dose to normal tissues. A regularity index RI was introduced that quantified the degree of target shape irregularity. The effect of target size and shape irregularity on feasibility of 5.0 and 10.0 mm leaves was analyzed. Results: Consistent plan degradation was observed for 10.0 mm (sometimes for 5.0 mm) compared to 2.5 mm MLC in terms of the above five plan metrics, but this degradation was small to clinically insignificant. As an exception, when target (PTV) size was smaller than about 1 cm diameter, clinically significant differences were found between 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mm MLC. Conclusion: 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC can be used in SRS/SRT for targets (PTV) diameter larger than 1 cm. For smaller targets, 2.5 mm MLC is clinically superior, 5.0 is acceptable and 10.0 mm MLC is discouraged in terms of PTV dose conformity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6693311/ /pubmed/31440471 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00741 Text en Copyright © 2019 Jalbout, Abou Zahr, Youssef and Shahine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Jalbout, Wassim
Abou Zahr, Jana
Youssef, Bassem
Shahine, Bilal
On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_full On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_fullStr On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_full_unstemmed On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_short On the Feasibility of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With 5.0 and 10.0 mm MLC Leaves as a Function of Target Size and Shape
title_sort on the feasibility of stereotactic radiosurgery with 5.0 and 10.0 mm mlc leaves as a function of target size and shape
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00741
work_keys_str_mv AT jalboutwassim onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape
AT abouzahrjana onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape
AT youssefbassem onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape
AT shahinebilal onthefeasibilityofstereotacticradiosurgerywith50and100mmmlcleavesasafunctionoftargetsizeandshape