Cargando…
The time-course of component processes of selective attention
Attentional selection shapes human perception, enhancing relevant information, according to behavioral goals. While many studies have investigated individual neural signatures of attention, here we used multivariate decoding of electrophysiological brain responses (MEG/EEG) to track and compare mult...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.067 |
_version_ | 1783443716339400704 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Tanya Duncan, John Mitchell, Daniel J. |
author_facet | Wen, Tanya Duncan, John Mitchell, Daniel J. |
author_sort | Wen, Tanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Attentional selection shapes human perception, enhancing relevant information, according to behavioral goals. While many studies have investigated individual neural signatures of attention, here we used multivariate decoding of electrophysiological brain responses (MEG/EEG) to track and compare multiple component processes of selective attention. Auditory cues instructed participants to select a particular visual target, embedded within a subsequent stream of displays. Combining single and multi-item displays with different types of distractors allowed multiple aspects of information content to be decoded, distinguishing distinct components of attention, as the selection process evolved. Although the task required comparison of items to an attentional “template” held in memory, signals consistent with such a template were largely undetectable throughout the preparatory period but re-emerged after presentation of a non-target choice display. Choice displays evoked strong neural representation of multiple target features, evolving over different timescales. We quantified five distinct processing operations with different time-courses. First, visual properties of the stimulus were strongly represented. Second, the candidate target was rapidly identified and localized in multi-item displays, providing the earliest evidence of modulation by behavioral relevance. Third, the identity of the target continued to be enhanced, relative to distractors. Fourth, only later was the behavioral significance of the target explicitly represented in single-item displays. Finally, if the target was not identified and search was to be resumed, then an attentional template was weakly reactivated. The observation that an item's behavioral relevance directs attention in multi-item displays prior to explicit representation of target/non-target status in single-item displays is consistent with two-stage models of attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6693528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Academic Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66935282019-10-01 The time-course of component processes of selective attention Wen, Tanya Duncan, John Mitchell, Daniel J. Neuroimage Article Attentional selection shapes human perception, enhancing relevant information, according to behavioral goals. While many studies have investigated individual neural signatures of attention, here we used multivariate decoding of electrophysiological brain responses (MEG/EEG) to track and compare multiple component processes of selective attention. Auditory cues instructed participants to select a particular visual target, embedded within a subsequent stream of displays. Combining single and multi-item displays with different types of distractors allowed multiple aspects of information content to be decoded, distinguishing distinct components of attention, as the selection process evolved. Although the task required comparison of items to an attentional “template” held in memory, signals consistent with such a template were largely undetectable throughout the preparatory period but re-emerged after presentation of a non-target choice display. Choice displays evoked strong neural representation of multiple target features, evolving over different timescales. We quantified five distinct processing operations with different time-courses. First, visual properties of the stimulus were strongly represented. Second, the candidate target was rapidly identified and localized in multi-item displays, providing the earliest evidence of modulation by behavioral relevance. Third, the identity of the target continued to be enhanced, relative to distractors. Fourth, only later was the behavioral significance of the target explicitly represented in single-item displays. Finally, if the target was not identified and search was to be resumed, then an attentional template was weakly reactivated. The observation that an item's behavioral relevance directs attention in multi-item displays prior to explicit representation of target/non-target status in single-item displays is consistent with two-stage models of attention. Academic Press 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6693528/ /pubmed/31150787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.067 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wen, Tanya Duncan, John Mitchell, Daniel J. The time-course of component processes of selective attention |
title | The time-course of component processes of selective attention |
title_full | The time-course of component processes of selective attention |
title_fullStr | The time-course of component processes of selective attention |
title_full_unstemmed | The time-course of component processes of selective attention |
title_short | The time-course of component processes of selective attention |
title_sort | time-course of component processes of selective attention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wentanya thetimecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention AT duncanjohn thetimecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention AT mitchelldanielj thetimecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention AT wentanya timecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention AT duncanjohn timecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention AT mitchelldanielj timecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention |