Cargando…

The time-course of component processes of selective attention

Attentional selection shapes human perception, enhancing relevant information, according to behavioral goals. While many studies have investigated individual neural signatures of attention, here we used multivariate decoding of electrophysiological brain responses (MEG/EEG) to track and compare mult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Tanya, Duncan, John, Mitchell, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.067
_version_ 1783443716339400704
author Wen, Tanya
Duncan, John
Mitchell, Daniel J.
author_facet Wen, Tanya
Duncan, John
Mitchell, Daniel J.
author_sort Wen, Tanya
collection PubMed
description Attentional selection shapes human perception, enhancing relevant information, according to behavioral goals. While many studies have investigated individual neural signatures of attention, here we used multivariate decoding of electrophysiological brain responses (MEG/EEG) to track and compare multiple component processes of selective attention. Auditory cues instructed participants to select a particular visual target, embedded within a subsequent stream of displays. Combining single and multi-item displays with different types of distractors allowed multiple aspects of information content to be decoded, distinguishing distinct components of attention, as the selection process evolved. Although the task required comparison of items to an attentional “template” held in memory, signals consistent with such a template were largely undetectable throughout the preparatory period but re-emerged after presentation of a non-target choice display. Choice displays evoked strong neural representation of multiple target features, evolving over different timescales. We quantified five distinct processing operations with different time-courses. First, visual properties of the stimulus were strongly represented. Second, the candidate target was rapidly identified and localized in multi-item displays, providing the earliest evidence of modulation by behavioral relevance. Third, the identity of the target continued to be enhanced, relative to distractors. Fourth, only later was the behavioral significance of the target explicitly represented in single-item displays. Finally, if the target was not identified and search was to be resumed, then an attentional template was weakly reactivated. The observation that an item's behavioral relevance directs attention in multi-item displays prior to explicit representation of target/non-target status in single-item displays is consistent with two-stage models of attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6693528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66935282019-10-01 The time-course of component processes of selective attention Wen, Tanya Duncan, John Mitchell, Daniel J. Neuroimage Article Attentional selection shapes human perception, enhancing relevant information, according to behavioral goals. While many studies have investigated individual neural signatures of attention, here we used multivariate decoding of electrophysiological brain responses (MEG/EEG) to track and compare multiple component processes of selective attention. Auditory cues instructed participants to select a particular visual target, embedded within a subsequent stream of displays. Combining single and multi-item displays with different types of distractors allowed multiple aspects of information content to be decoded, distinguishing distinct components of attention, as the selection process evolved. Although the task required comparison of items to an attentional “template” held in memory, signals consistent with such a template were largely undetectable throughout the preparatory period but re-emerged after presentation of a non-target choice display. Choice displays evoked strong neural representation of multiple target features, evolving over different timescales. We quantified five distinct processing operations with different time-courses. First, visual properties of the stimulus were strongly represented. Second, the candidate target was rapidly identified and localized in multi-item displays, providing the earliest evidence of modulation by behavioral relevance. Third, the identity of the target continued to be enhanced, relative to distractors. Fourth, only later was the behavioral significance of the target explicitly represented in single-item displays. Finally, if the target was not identified and search was to be resumed, then an attentional template was weakly reactivated. The observation that an item's behavioral relevance directs attention in multi-item displays prior to explicit representation of target/non-target status in single-item displays is consistent with two-stage models of attention. Academic Press 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6693528/ /pubmed/31150787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.067 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wen, Tanya
Duncan, John
Mitchell, Daniel J.
The time-course of component processes of selective attention
title The time-course of component processes of selective attention
title_full The time-course of component processes of selective attention
title_fullStr The time-course of component processes of selective attention
title_full_unstemmed The time-course of component processes of selective attention
title_short The time-course of component processes of selective attention
title_sort time-course of component processes of selective attention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.067
work_keys_str_mv AT wentanya thetimecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention
AT duncanjohn thetimecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention
AT mitchelldanielj thetimecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention
AT wentanya timecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention
AT duncanjohn timecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention
AT mitchelldanielj timecourseofcomponentprocessesofselectiveattention