Cargando…
Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial
OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as an effective, drug-free tool for pain management, but there is a lack of randomized, controlled data evaluating its effectiveness in hospitalized patients. We sought to measure the impact of on-demand VR versus “health and wellness” televis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219115 |
_version_ | 1783443726993981440 |
---|---|
author | Spiegel, Brennan Fuller, Garth Lopez, Mayra Dupuy, Taylor Noah, Benjamin Howard, Amber Albert, Michael Tashjian, Vartan Lam, Richard Ahn, Joseph Dailey, Francis Rosen, Bradley T. Vrahas, Mark Little, Milton Garlich, John Dzubur, Eldin IsHak, Waguih Danovitch, Itai |
author_facet | Spiegel, Brennan Fuller, Garth Lopez, Mayra Dupuy, Taylor Noah, Benjamin Howard, Amber Albert, Michael Tashjian, Vartan Lam, Richard Ahn, Joseph Dailey, Francis Rosen, Bradley T. Vrahas, Mark Little, Milton Garlich, John Dzubur, Eldin IsHak, Waguih Danovitch, Itai |
author_sort | Spiegel, Brennan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as an effective, drug-free tool for pain management, but there is a lack of randomized, controlled data evaluating its effectiveness in hospitalized patients. We sought to measure the impact of on-demand VR versus “health and wellness” television programming for pain in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial in hospitalized patients with an average pain score of ≥3 out of 10 points. Patients in the experimental group received a library of 21 VR experiences administered using the Samsung Gear Oculus headset; control patients viewed specialized television programming to promote health and wellness. Clinical staff followed usual care; study interventions were not protocolized. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain using a numeric rating scale, as recorded by nursing staff during usual care. Pre- and post-intervention pain scores were compared immediately after initial treatment and after 48- and 72-hours. RESULTS: There were 120 subjects (61 VR; 59 control). The mean within-subject difference in immediate pre- and post-intervention pain scores was larger in the VR group (-1.72 points; SD 3.56) than in the control group (-0.46 points; SD 3.01); this difference was significant in favor of VR (P < .04). When limited to the subgroup of patients with severe baseline pain (≥7 points), the effect of VR was more pronounced vs. control (-3.04, SD 3.75 vs. -0.93, SD 2.16 points; P = .02). In regression analyses adjusting for pre-intervention pain, time, age, gender, and type of pain, VR yielded a .59 (P = .03) and .56 (P = .04) point incremental reduction in pain versus control during the 48- and 72-hour post-intervention periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VR significantly reduces pain versus an active control condition in hospitalized patients. VR is most effective for severe pain. Future trials should evaluate standardized order sets that interpose VR as an early non-drug option for analgesia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6693733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66937332019-08-16 Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial Spiegel, Brennan Fuller, Garth Lopez, Mayra Dupuy, Taylor Noah, Benjamin Howard, Amber Albert, Michael Tashjian, Vartan Lam, Richard Ahn, Joseph Dailey, Francis Rosen, Bradley T. Vrahas, Mark Little, Milton Garlich, John Dzubur, Eldin IsHak, Waguih Danovitch, Itai PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as an effective, drug-free tool for pain management, but there is a lack of randomized, controlled data evaluating its effectiveness in hospitalized patients. We sought to measure the impact of on-demand VR versus “health and wellness” television programming for pain in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial in hospitalized patients with an average pain score of ≥3 out of 10 points. Patients in the experimental group received a library of 21 VR experiences administered using the Samsung Gear Oculus headset; control patients viewed specialized television programming to promote health and wellness. Clinical staff followed usual care; study interventions were not protocolized. The primary outcome was patient-reported pain using a numeric rating scale, as recorded by nursing staff during usual care. Pre- and post-intervention pain scores were compared immediately after initial treatment and after 48- and 72-hours. RESULTS: There were 120 subjects (61 VR; 59 control). The mean within-subject difference in immediate pre- and post-intervention pain scores was larger in the VR group (-1.72 points; SD 3.56) than in the control group (-0.46 points; SD 3.01); this difference was significant in favor of VR (P < .04). When limited to the subgroup of patients with severe baseline pain (≥7 points), the effect of VR was more pronounced vs. control (-3.04, SD 3.75 vs. -0.93, SD 2.16 points; P = .02). In regression analyses adjusting for pre-intervention pain, time, age, gender, and type of pain, VR yielded a .59 (P = .03) and .56 (P = .04) point incremental reduction in pain versus control during the 48- and 72-hour post-intervention periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VR significantly reduces pain versus an active control condition in hospitalized patients. VR is most effective for severe pain. Future trials should evaluate standardized order sets that interpose VR as an early non-drug option for analgesia. Public Library of Science 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6693733/ /pubmed/31412029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219115 Text en © 2019 Spiegel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Spiegel, Brennan Fuller, Garth Lopez, Mayra Dupuy, Taylor Noah, Benjamin Howard, Amber Albert, Michael Tashjian, Vartan Lam, Richard Ahn, Joseph Dailey, Francis Rosen, Bradley T. Vrahas, Mark Little, Milton Garlich, John Dzubur, Eldin IsHak, Waguih Danovitch, Itai Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial |
title | Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial |
title_full | Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial |
title_fullStr | Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial |
title_short | Virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: A randomized comparative effectiveness trial |
title_sort | virtual reality for management of pain in hospitalized patients: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spiegelbrennan virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT fullergarth virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT lopezmayra virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT dupuytaylor virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT noahbenjamin virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT howardamber virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT albertmichael virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT tashjianvartan virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT lamrichard virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT ahnjoseph virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT daileyfrancis virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT rosenbradleyt virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT vrahasmark virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT littlemilton virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT garlichjohn virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT dzubureldin virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT ishakwaguih virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial AT danovitchitai virtualrealityformanagementofpaininhospitalizedpatientsarandomizedcomparativeeffectivenesstrial |