Cargando…

Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Speed is an important prerequisite in soccer. Therefore, a large number of tests have been developed aiming to investigate several speed skills relevant to soccer. This systematic review aimed to examine the validity and reliability of speed tests used in adult soccer players. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altmann, Stefan, Ringhof, Steffen, Neumann, Rainer, Woll, Alexander, Rumpf, Michael C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220982
_version_ 1783443738280853504
author Altmann, Stefan
Ringhof, Steffen
Neumann, Rainer
Woll, Alexander
Rumpf, Michael C.
author_facet Altmann, Stefan
Ringhof, Steffen
Neumann, Rainer
Woll, Alexander
Rumpf, Michael C.
author_sort Altmann, Stefan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Speed is an important prerequisite in soccer. Therefore, a large number of tests have been developed aiming to investigate several speed skills relevant to soccer. This systematic review aimed to examine the validity and reliability of speed tests used in adult soccer players. METHODS: A systematic search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they investigated speed tests in adult soccer players and reported validity (construct and criterion) or reliability (intraday and interday) data. The tests were categorized into linear-sprint, repeated-sprint, change-of-direction sprint, agility, and tests incorporating combinations of these skills. RESULTS: In total, 90 studies covering 167 tests were included. Linear-sprint (n = 67) and change-of-direction sprint (n = 60) were studied most often, followed by combinations of the aforementioned (n = 21) and repeated-sprint tests (n = 15). Agility tests were examined fewest (n = 4). Mainly based on construct validity studies, acceptable validity was reported for the majority of the tests in all categories, except for agility tests, where no validity study was identified. Regarding intraday and interday reliability, ICCs>0.75 and CVs<3.0% were evident for most of the tests in all categories. These results applied for total and average times. In contrast, measures representing fatigue such as percent decrement scores indicated inconsistent validity findings. Regarding reliability, ICCs were 0.11–0.49 and CVs were 16.8–51.0%. CONCLUSION: Except for agility tests, several tests for all categories with acceptable levels of validity and high levels of reliability for adult soccer players are available. Caution should be given when interpreting fatigue measures, e.g., percent decrement scores. Given the lack of accepted gold-standard tests for each category, researchers and practitioners may base their test selection on the broad database provided in this systematic review. Future research should pay attention to the criterion validity examining the relationship between test results and match parameters as well as to the development and evaluation of soccer-specific agility tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6693781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66937812019-08-16 Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review Altmann, Stefan Ringhof, Steffen Neumann, Rainer Woll, Alexander Rumpf, Michael C. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Speed is an important prerequisite in soccer. Therefore, a large number of tests have been developed aiming to investigate several speed skills relevant to soccer. This systematic review aimed to examine the validity and reliability of speed tests used in adult soccer players. METHODS: A systematic search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they investigated speed tests in adult soccer players and reported validity (construct and criterion) or reliability (intraday and interday) data. The tests were categorized into linear-sprint, repeated-sprint, change-of-direction sprint, agility, and tests incorporating combinations of these skills. RESULTS: In total, 90 studies covering 167 tests were included. Linear-sprint (n = 67) and change-of-direction sprint (n = 60) were studied most often, followed by combinations of the aforementioned (n = 21) and repeated-sprint tests (n = 15). Agility tests were examined fewest (n = 4). Mainly based on construct validity studies, acceptable validity was reported for the majority of the tests in all categories, except for agility tests, where no validity study was identified. Regarding intraday and interday reliability, ICCs>0.75 and CVs<3.0% were evident for most of the tests in all categories. These results applied for total and average times. In contrast, measures representing fatigue such as percent decrement scores indicated inconsistent validity findings. Regarding reliability, ICCs were 0.11–0.49 and CVs were 16.8–51.0%. CONCLUSION: Except for agility tests, several tests for all categories with acceptable levels of validity and high levels of reliability for adult soccer players are available. Caution should be given when interpreting fatigue measures, e.g., percent decrement scores. Given the lack of accepted gold-standard tests for each category, researchers and practitioners may base their test selection on the broad database provided in this systematic review. Future research should pay attention to the criterion validity examining the relationship between test results and match parameters as well as to the development and evaluation of soccer-specific agility tests. Public Library of Science 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6693781/ /pubmed/31412057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220982 Text en © 2019 Altmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Altmann, Stefan
Ringhof, Steffen
Neumann, Rainer
Woll, Alexander
Rumpf, Michael C.
Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review
title Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review
title_full Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review
title_short Validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: A systematic review
title_sort validity and reliability of speed tests used in soccer: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220982
work_keys_str_mv AT altmannstefan validityandreliabilityofspeedtestsusedinsoccerasystematicreview
AT ringhofsteffen validityandreliabilityofspeedtestsusedinsoccerasystematicreview
AT neumannrainer validityandreliabilityofspeedtestsusedinsoccerasystematicreview
AT wollalexander validityandreliabilityofspeedtestsusedinsoccerasystematicreview
AT rumpfmichaelc validityandreliabilityofspeedtestsusedinsoccerasystematicreview