Cargando…
Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions
When individuals are undecided between options, they may flip a coin or use other aids that produce random outcomes to support decision-making. Such aids lead to clear suggestions, which, interestingly, individuals do not necessarily follow. Instead when looking at the outcome, individuals sometimes...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220736 |
_version_ | 1783443748493983744 |
---|---|
author | Jaffé, Mariela E. Reutner, Leonie Greifeneder, Rainer |
author_facet | Jaffé, Mariela E. Reutner, Leonie Greifeneder, Rainer |
author_sort | Jaffé, Mariela E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | When individuals are undecided between options, they may flip a coin or use other aids that produce random outcomes to support decision-making. Such aids lead to clear suggestions, which, interestingly, individuals do not necessarily follow. Instead when looking at the outcome, individuals sometimes appear to like or dislike the suggestion, and then decide according to this feeling. In this manuscript we argue that such a decision aid can function as a catalyst. As it points to one option over the other, individuals focus on obtaining this option and engage in a more vivid representation of the same. By imagining obtaining the option, feelings related to the option become stronger, which then drive feelings of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the outcome of the decision aid. We provide support for this phenomenon throughout two studies. Study 1 indicates that using a catalyst leads to stronger feelings. Study 2 replicates this finding using a different catalyst, and rules out alternative explanations. Here, participants report that after having used a catalyst, they experienced a stronger feeling of suddenly knowing what they want compared to the control group that did not use a catalyst. Implications of these results for research and practice are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6693849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66938492019-08-16 Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions Jaffé, Mariela E. Reutner, Leonie Greifeneder, Rainer PLoS One Research Article When individuals are undecided between options, they may flip a coin or use other aids that produce random outcomes to support decision-making. Such aids lead to clear suggestions, which, interestingly, individuals do not necessarily follow. Instead when looking at the outcome, individuals sometimes appear to like or dislike the suggestion, and then decide according to this feeling. In this manuscript we argue that such a decision aid can function as a catalyst. As it points to one option over the other, individuals focus on obtaining this option and engage in a more vivid representation of the same. By imagining obtaining the option, feelings related to the option become stronger, which then drive feelings of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the outcome of the decision aid. We provide support for this phenomenon throughout two studies. Study 1 indicates that using a catalyst leads to stronger feelings. Study 2 replicates this finding using a different catalyst, and rules out alternative explanations. Here, participants report that after having used a catalyst, they experienced a stronger feeling of suddenly knowing what they want compared to the control group that did not use a catalyst. Implications of these results for research and practice are discussed. Public Library of Science 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6693849/ /pubmed/31412059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220736 Text en © 2019 Jaffé et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jaffé, Mariela E. Reutner, Leonie Greifeneder, Rainer Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions |
title | Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions |
title_full | Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions |
title_fullStr | Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions |
title_full_unstemmed | Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions |
title_short | Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions |
title_sort | catalyzing decisions: how a coin flip strengthens affective reactions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6693849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaffemarielae catalyzingdecisionshowacoinflipstrengthensaffectivereactions AT reutnerleonie catalyzingdecisionshowacoinflipstrengthensaffectivereactions AT greifenederrainer catalyzingdecisionshowacoinflipstrengthensaffectivereactions |