Cargando…

Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective

Gastrectomy is the mainstay treatment for gastric cancer. To reduce the associated patient burden, minimally invasive gastrectomy was introduced in almost 30 years ago. The increase in the availability of surgical robotic systems led to the first robotic-assisted gastrectomy to be performed in 2002...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Boxel, Gijsbert I., Ruurda, Jelle P., van Hillegersberg, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31273481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00979-z
_version_ 1783443773651419136
author van Boxel, Gijsbert I.
Ruurda, Jelle P.
van Hillegersberg, Richard
author_facet van Boxel, Gijsbert I.
Ruurda, Jelle P.
van Hillegersberg, Richard
author_sort van Boxel, Gijsbert I.
collection PubMed
description Gastrectomy is the mainstay treatment for gastric cancer. To reduce the associated patient burden, minimally invasive gastrectomy was introduced in almost 30 years ago. The increase in the availability of surgical robotic systems led to the first robotic-assisted gastrectomy to be performed in 2002 in Japan. Robotic gastrectomy however, particularly in Europe, has not yet gained significant traction. Most reports to date are from Asia, predominantly containing observational studies. These cohorts are commonly different in the tumour stage, location (particularly with regards to gastroesophageal junctional tumours) and patient BMI compared to those encountered in Europe. To date, no randomised clinical trials have been performed comparing robotic gastrectomy to either laparoscopic or open equivalent. Cohort studies show that robotic gastrectomy is equal oncological outcomes in terms of survival and lymph node yield. Operative times in the robotic group are consistently longer compared to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy, although evidence is emerging that resectional surgical time is equal. The only reproducibly significant difference in favour of robot-assisted gastrectomy is a reduction in intra-operative blood loss and some studies show a reduction in the risk of pancreatic fistula formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6694090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66940902019-08-28 Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective van Boxel, Gijsbert I. Ruurda, Jelle P. van Hillegersberg, Richard Gastric Cancer Review Article Gastrectomy is the mainstay treatment for gastric cancer. To reduce the associated patient burden, minimally invasive gastrectomy was introduced in almost 30 years ago. The increase in the availability of surgical robotic systems led to the first robotic-assisted gastrectomy to be performed in 2002 in Japan. Robotic gastrectomy however, particularly in Europe, has not yet gained significant traction. Most reports to date are from Asia, predominantly containing observational studies. These cohorts are commonly different in the tumour stage, location (particularly with regards to gastroesophageal junctional tumours) and patient BMI compared to those encountered in Europe. To date, no randomised clinical trials have been performed comparing robotic gastrectomy to either laparoscopic or open equivalent. Cohort studies show that robotic gastrectomy is equal oncological outcomes in terms of survival and lymph node yield. Operative times in the robotic group are consistently longer compared to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy, although evidence is emerging that resectional surgical time is equal. The only reproducibly significant difference in favour of robot-assisted gastrectomy is a reduction in intra-operative blood loss and some studies show a reduction in the risk of pancreatic fistula formation. Springer Singapore 2019-07-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6694090/ /pubmed/31273481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00979-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
van Boxel, Gijsbert I.
Ruurda, Jelle P.
van Hillegersberg, Richard
Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective
title Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective
title_full Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective
title_fullStr Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective
title_full_unstemmed Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective
title_short Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective
title_sort robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a european perspective
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31273481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00979-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vanboxelgijsberti roboticassistedgastrectomyforgastriccanceraeuropeanperspective
AT ruurdajellep roboticassistedgastrectomyforgastriccanceraeuropeanperspective
AT vanhillegersbergrichard roboticassistedgastrectomyforgastriccanceraeuropeanperspective