Cargando…

In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging

Skeletal muscle architecture significantly influences the performance capacity of a muscle. A DTI-based method has been recently considered as a new reference standard to validate measurement of muscle structure in vivo. This study sought to quantify muscle architecture parameters such as fascicle l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Körting, Clara, Schlippe, Marius, Petersson, Sven, Pennati, Gaia Valentina, Tarassova, Olga, Arndt, Anton, Finni, Taija, Zhao, Kangqiao, Wang, Ruoli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47968-x
_version_ 1783443782822264832
author Körting, Clara
Schlippe, Marius
Petersson, Sven
Pennati, Gaia Valentina
Tarassova, Olga
Arndt, Anton
Finni, Taija
Zhao, Kangqiao
Wang, Ruoli
author_facet Körting, Clara
Schlippe, Marius
Petersson, Sven
Pennati, Gaia Valentina
Tarassova, Olga
Arndt, Anton
Finni, Taija
Zhao, Kangqiao
Wang, Ruoli
author_sort Körting, Clara
collection PubMed
description Skeletal muscle architecture significantly influences the performance capacity of a muscle. A DTI-based method has been recently considered as a new reference standard to validate measurement of muscle structure in vivo. This study sought to quantify muscle architecture parameters such as fascicle length (FL), pennation angle (PA) and muscle thickness (t(m)) in post-stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and to quantitatively compare the differences with 2D ultrasonography (US) and DTI. Muscle fascicles were reconstructed to examine the anatomy of the medial gastrocnemius, posterior soleus and tibialis anterior in seven stroke survivors using US- and DTI-based techniques, respectively. By aligning the US and DTI coordinate system, DTI reconstructed muscle fascicles at the same scanning plane of the US data can be identified. The architecture parameters estimated based on two imaging modalities were further compared. Significant differences were observed for PA and t(m) between two methods. Although mean FL was not significantly different, there were considerable intra-individual differences in FL and PA. On the individual level, parameters measured by US agreed poorly with those from DTI in both deep and superficial muscles. The significant differences in muscle parameters we observed suggested that the DTI-based method seems to be a better method to quantify muscle architecture parameters which can provide important information for treatment planning and to personalize a computational muscle model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6694129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66941292019-08-19 In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging Körting, Clara Schlippe, Marius Petersson, Sven Pennati, Gaia Valentina Tarassova, Olga Arndt, Anton Finni, Taija Zhao, Kangqiao Wang, Ruoli Sci Rep Article Skeletal muscle architecture significantly influences the performance capacity of a muscle. A DTI-based method has been recently considered as a new reference standard to validate measurement of muscle structure in vivo. This study sought to quantify muscle architecture parameters such as fascicle length (FL), pennation angle (PA) and muscle thickness (t(m)) in post-stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and to quantitatively compare the differences with 2D ultrasonography (US) and DTI. Muscle fascicles were reconstructed to examine the anatomy of the medial gastrocnemius, posterior soleus and tibialis anterior in seven stroke survivors using US- and DTI-based techniques, respectively. By aligning the US and DTI coordinate system, DTI reconstructed muscle fascicles at the same scanning plane of the US data can be identified. The architecture parameters estimated based on two imaging modalities were further compared. Significant differences were observed for PA and t(m) between two methods. Although mean FL was not significantly different, there were considerable intra-individual differences in FL and PA. On the individual level, parameters measured by US agreed poorly with those from DTI in both deep and superficial muscles. The significant differences in muscle parameters we observed suggested that the DTI-based method seems to be a better method to quantify muscle architecture parameters which can provide important information for treatment planning and to personalize a computational muscle model. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6694129/ /pubmed/31413264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47968-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Körting, Clara
Schlippe, Marius
Petersson, Sven
Pennati, Gaia Valentina
Tarassova, Olga
Arndt, Anton
Finni, Taija
Zhao, Kangqiao
Wang, Ruoli
In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging
title In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging
title_full In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging
title_fullStr In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging
title_full_unstemmed In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging
title_short In vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging
title_sort in vivo muscle morphology comparison in post-stroke survivors using ultrasonography and diffusion tensor imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31413264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47968-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kortingclara invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT schlippemarius invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT peterssonsven invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT pennatigaiavalentina invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT tarassovaolga invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT arndtanton invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT finnitaija invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT zhaokangqiao invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging
AT wangruoli invivomusclemorphologycomparisoninpoststrokesurvivorsusingultrasonographyanddiffusiontensorimaging