Cargando…

3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT

BACKGROUND: The bone marrow (BM) is a main risk organ during Lu-177-PSMA ligand therapy of metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. So far, BM dosimetry relies on S values, which are pre-computed for reference anatomies, simplified activity distributions, and a physiologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gosewisch, Astrid, Ilhan, Harun, Tattenberg, Sebastian, Mairani, Andrea, Parodi, Katia, Brosch, Julia, Kaiser, Lena, Gildehaus, Franz Josef, Todica, Andrei, Ziegler, Sibylle, Bartenstein, Peter, Böning, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0548-z
_version_ 1783443808909787136
author Gosewisch, Astrid
Ilhan, Harun
Tattenberg, Sebastian
Mairani, Andrea
Parodi, Katia
Brosch, Julia
Kaiser, Lena
Gildehaus, Franz Josef
Todica, Andrei
Ziegler, Sibylle
Bartenstein, Peter
Böning, Guido
author_facet Gosewisch, Astrid
Ilhan, Harun
Tattenberg, Sebastian
Mairani, Andrea
Parodi, Katia
Brosch, Julia
Kaiser, Lena
Gildehaus, Franz Josef
Todica, Andrei
Ziegler, Sibylle
Bartenstein, Peter
Böning, Guido
author_sort Gosewisch, Astrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The bone marrow (BM) is a main risk organ during Lu-177-PSMA ligand therapy of metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. So far, BM dosimetry relies on S values, which are pre-computed for reference anatomies, simplified activity distributions, and a physiological BM distribution. However, mCRPC patients may show a considerable bone lesion load, which leads to a heterogeneous and patient-specific activity accumulation close to BM-bearing sites. Furthermore, the patient-specific BM distribution might be significantly altered in the presence of bone lesions. The aim was to perform BM absorbed dose calculations through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and to investigate the potential value of image-based BM localization. This study is based on 11 Lu-177-PSMA-617 therapy cycles of 10 patients (10 first cycles), who obtained a pre-therapeutic Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT; quantitative Lu-177 SPECT acquisitions of the abdomen 24 (+CT), 48, and 72 h p.i.; and a Lu-177 whole-body planar acquisition at 24 h post-therapy. Patient-specific 3D volumes of interest were segmented from the Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT, filled with activity information from the Lu-177 data, and imported into the FLUKA MC code together with the patient CT. MC simulations of the BM absorbed dose were performed assuming a physiological BM distribution according to the ICRP 110 reference male (MC1) or a displacement of active BM from the direct location of bone lesions (MC2). Results were compared with those from S values (SMIRD). BM absorbed doses were correlated with the decrease of lymphocytes, total white blood cells, hemoglobin level, and platelets. For two patients, an additional pre-therapeutic Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT was performed for BM localization. RESULTS: Median BM absorbed doses were 130, 37, and 11 mGy/GBq for MC1, MC2, and SMIRD, respectively. Significant strong correlation with the decrease of platelet counts was found, with highest correlation for MC2 (MC1: r = − 0.63, p = 0.04; MC2: r = − 0.71, p = 0.01; SMIRD: r = − 0.62, p = 0.04). For both investigated patients, BM localization via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT indicated a displacement of active BM from the direct location of lesions similar to model MC2 and led to a reduction in the BM absorbed dose of 40 and 41% compared to MC1. CONCLUSION: Higher BM absorbed doses were observed for MC-based models; however, for MC2, all absorbed doses were still below 2 Gy. MC1 resulted in critical values for some patients, but is suspected to yield strongly exaggerated absorbed doses by neglecting bone marrow displacement. Image-based BM localization might be beneficial, and future studies are recommended to support an improvement for the prediction of hematoxicities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6694348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66943482019-08-28 3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT Gosewisch, Astrid Ilhan, Harun Tattenberg, Sebastian Mairani, Andrea Parodi, Katia Brosch, Julia Kaiser, Lena Gildehaus, Franz Josef Todica, Andrei Ziegler, Sibylle Bartenstein, Peter Böning, Guido EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The bone marrow (BM) is a main risk organ during Lu-177-PSMA ligand therapy of metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. So far, BM dosimetry relies on S values, which are pre-computed for reference anatomies, simplified activity distributions, and a physiological BM distribution. However, mCRPC patients may show a considerable bone lesion load, which leads to a heterogeneous and patient-specific activity accumulation close to BM-bearing sites. Furthermore, the patient-specific BM distribution might be significantly altered in the presence of bone lesions. The aim was to perform BM absorbed dose calculations through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and to investigate the potential value of image-based BM localization. This study is based on 11 Lu-177-PSMA-617 therapy cycles of 10 patients (10 first cycles), who obtained a pre-therapeutic Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT; quantitative Lu-177 SPECT acquisitions of the abdomen 24 (+CT), 48, and 72 h p.i.; and a Lu-177 whole-body planar acquisition at 24 h post-therapy. Patient-specific 3D volumes of interest were segmented from the Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT, filled with activity information from the Lu-177 data, and imported into the FLUKA MC code together with the patient CT. MC simulations of the BM absorbed dose were performed assuming a physiological BM distribution according to the ICRP 110 reference male (MC1) or a displacement of active BM from the direct location of bone lesions (MC2). Results were compared with those from S values (SMIRD). BM absorbed doses were correlated with the decrease of lymphocytes, total white blood cells, hemoglobin level, and platelets. For two patients, an additional pre-therapeutic Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT was performed for BM localization. RESULTS: Median BM absorbed doses were 130, 37, and 11 mGy/GBq for MC1, MC2, and SMIRD, respectively. Significant strong correlation with the decrease of platelet counts was found, with highest correlation for MC2 (MC1: r = − 0.63, p = 0.04; MC2: r = − 0.71, p = 0.01; SMIRD: r = − 0.62, p = 0.04). For both investigated patients, BM localization via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT indicated a displacement of active BM from the direct location of lesions similar to model MC2 and led to a reduction in the BM absorbed dose of 40 and 41% compared to MC1. CONCLUSION: Higher BM absorbed doses were observed for MC-based models; however, for MC2, all absorbed doses were still below 2 Gy. MC1 resulted in critical values for some patients, but is suspected to yield strongly exaggerated absorbed doses by neglecting bone marrow displacement. Image-based BM localization might be beneficial, and future studies are recommended to support an improvement for the prediction of hematoxicities. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6694348/ /pubmed/31414241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0548-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gosewisch, Astrid
Ilhan, Harun
Tattenberg, Sebastian
Mairani, Andrea
Parodi, Katia
Brosch, Julia
Kaiser, Lena
Gildehaus, Franz Josef
Todica, Andrei
Ziegler, Sibylle
Bartenstein, Peter
Böning, Guido
3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT
title 3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT
title_full 3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT
title_fullStr 3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT
title_full_unstemmed 3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT
title_short 3D Monte Carlo bone marrow dosimetry for Lu-177-PSMA therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3D localization of active bone marrow via Tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody SPECT/CT
title_sort 3d monte carlo bone marrow dosimetry for lu-177-psma therapy with guidance of non-invasive 3d localization of active bone marrow via tc-99m-anti-granulocyte antibody spect/ct
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0548-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gosewischastrid 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT ilhanharun 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT tattenbergsebastian 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT mairaniandrea 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT parodikatia 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT broschjulia 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT kaiserlena 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT gildehausfranzjosef 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT todicaandrei 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT zieglersibylle 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT bartensteinpeter 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct
AT boningguido 3dmontecarlobonemarrowdosimetryforlu177psmatherapywithguidanceofnoninvasive3dlocalizationofactivebonemarrowviatc99mantigranulocyteantibodyspectct