Cargando…

How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes?

BACKGROUND: Sarcoptic mange is a broadly distributed parasitic disease caused by Sarcoptes scabiei that affects wild mammals from all over the world, including the Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Selective culling of the scabietic individuals is the main management measure for disease control in Ibe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valldeperes, Marta, Granados, José Enrique, Pérez, Jesús María, Castro, Inmaculada, Ráez-Bravo, Arián, Fandos, Paulino, López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón, Serrano, Emmanuel, Mentaberre, Gregorio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31416471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3665-7
_version_ 1783443834547470336
author Valldeperes, Marta
Granados, José Enrique
Pérez, Jesús María
Castro, Inmaculada
Ráez-Bravo, Arián
Fandos, Paulino
López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón
Serrano, Emmanuel
Mentaberre, Gregorio
author_facet Valldeperes, Marta
Granados, José Enrique
Pérez, Jesús María
Castro, Inmaculada
Ráez-Bravo, Arián
Fandos, Paulino
López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón
Serrano, Emmanuel
Mentaberre, Gregorio
author_sort Valldeperes, Marta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sarcoptic mange is a broadly distributed parasitic disease caused by Sarcoptes scabiei that affects wild mammals from all over the world, including the Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Selective culling of the scabietic individuals is the main management measure for disease control in Iberian ibex populations. Although visual identification of mange-compatible lesions is the reference method to decide the target individual, both false negative and positive cases are common in the wild. The aim of this work is to determine the sensitivity (SE), and the specificity (SP) of selective culling after evaluating 403 ibexes hunted in the Sierra Nevada Nature Space for sarcoptic mange control between 2002 and 2015. METHODS: A combination of skin scrapings and potassium hidroxide (KOH) skin digestion was used for sarcoptic mange diagnosis. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess the effects of sex, age (juveniles and adults) and period of the year (wet and dry periods) on the SE and SP of the visual diagnosis method. RESULTS: The SE obtained for the visual determination of scabietic ibexes was 87.14%, whereas the SP was 60.71%. According to our model selection, SE of the visual diagnosis was explained by the additive effects of age and the period of the year. In fact, SE was lower in juveniles (64.76%) than in adults (94.26%) and during the dry period (73.44%) as compared to the wet period (92.09%). On the other hand, SP was best explained by the GLM including the additive effects of sex and the period of the year. The visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange resulted less specific in females (22.73%) than in males (74.19%) and during the wet (55.22%) than in the dry period (82.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Maximizing SE and SP is essential to achieving a high rate of removal of affected individuals from the environment without eliminating potentially resistant individuals. Selective culling must be conservative during the wet period and with females due to the lower SP. Conversely, visual diagnosis of scabietic juveniles and during the dry period has to be improved, due to the lower SE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6694496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66944962019-08-19 How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes? Valldeperes, Marta Granados, José Enrique Pérez, Jesús María Castro, Inmaculada Ráez-Bravo, Arián Fandos, Paulino López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón Serrano, Emmanuel Mentaberre, Gregorio Parasit Vectors Short Report BACKGROUND: Sarcoptic mange is a broadly distributed parasitic disease caused by Sarcoptes scabiei that affects wild mammals from all over the world, including the Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Selective culling of the scabietic individuals is the main management measure for disease control in Iberian ibex populations. Although visual identification of mange-compatible lesions is the reference method to decide the target individual, both false negative and positive cases are common in the wild. The aim of this work is to determine the sensitivity (SE), and the specificity (SP) of selective culling after evaluating 403 ibexes hunted in the Sierra Nevada Nature Space for sarcoptic mange control between 2002 and 2015. METHODS: A combination of skin scrapings and potassium hidroxide (KOH) skin digestion was used for sarcoptic mange diagnosis. Generalized linear models (GLM) were used to assess the effects of sex, age (juveniles and adults) and period of the year (wet and dry periods) on the SE and SP of the visual diagnosis method. RESULTS: The SE obtained for the visual determination of scabietic ibexes was 87.14%, whereas the SP was 60.71%. According to our model selection, SE of the visual diagnosis was explained by the additive effects of age and the period of the year. In fact, SE was lower in juveniles (64.76%) than in adults (94.26%) and during the dry period (73.44%) as compared to the wet period (92.09%). On the other hand, SP was best explained by the GLM including the additive effects of sex and the period of the year. The visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange resulted less specific in females (22.73%) than in males (74.19%) and during the wet (55.22%) than in the dry period (82.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Maximizing SE and SP is essential to achieving a high rate of removal of affected individuals from the environment without eliminating potentially resistant individuals. Selective culling must be conservative during the wet period and with females due to the lower SP. Conversely, visual diagnosis of scabietic juveniles and during the dry period has to be improved, due to the lower SE. BioMed Central 2019-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6694496/ /pubmed/31416471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3665-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Valldeperes, Marta
Granados, José Enrique
Pérez, Jesús María
Castro, Inmaculada
Ráez-Bravo, Arián
Fandos, Paulino
López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón
Serrano, Emmanuel
Mentaberre, Gregorio
How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes?
title How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes?
title_full How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes?
title_fullStr How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes?
title_full_unstemmed How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes?
title_short How sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging Iberian ibexes?
title_sort how sensitive and specific is the visual diagnosis of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging iberian ibexes?
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31416471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3665-7
work_keys_str_mv AT valldeperesmarta howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT granadosjoseenrique howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT perezjesusmaria howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT castroinmaculada howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT raezbravoarian howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT fandospaulino howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT lopezolverajorgeramon howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT serranoemmanuel howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes
AT mentaberregregorio howsensitiveandspecificisthevisualdiagnosisofsarcopticmangeinfreerangingiberianibexes