Cargando…

Dynamic risk prediction for diabetes using biomarker change measurements

BACKGROUND: Dynamic risk models, which incorporate disease-free survival and repeated measurements over time, might yield more accurate predictions of future health status compared to static models. The objective of this study was to develop and apply a dynamic prediction model to estimate the risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parast, Layla, Mathews, Megan, Friedberg, Mark W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0812-y
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Dynamic risk models, which incorporate disease-free survival and repeated measurements over time, might yield more accurate predictions of future health status compared to static models. The objective of this study was to develop and apply a dynamic prediction model to estimate the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Both a static prediction model and a dynamic landmark model were used to provide predictions of a 2-year horizon time for diabetes-free survival, updated at 1, 2, and 3 years post-baseline i.e., predicting diabetes-free survival to 2 years and predicting diabetes-free survival to 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years post-baseline, given the patient already survived past 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-baseline, respectively. Prediction accuracy was evaluated at each time point using robust non-parametric procedures. Data from 2057 participants of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) study (1027 in metformin arm, 1030 in placebo arm) were analyzed. RESULTS: The dynamic landmark model demonstrated good prediction accuracy with area under curve (AUC) estimates ranging from 0.645 to 0.752 and Brier Score estimates ranging from 0.088 to 0.135. Relative to a static risk model, the dynamic landmark model did not significantly differ in terms of AUC but had significantly lower (i.e., better) Brier Score estimates for predictions at 1, 2, and 3 years (e.g. 0.167 versus 0.099; difference − 0.068 95% CI − 0.083 to − 0.053, at 3 years in placebo group) post-baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic prediction models based on longitudinal, repeated risk factor measurements have the potential to improve the accuracy of future health status predictions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0812-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.