Cargando…
Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies
BACKGROUND: The low bacterial load in samples acquired from the lungs, have made studies on the airway microbiome vulnerable to contamination from bacterial DNA introduced during sampling and laboratory processing. We have examined the impact of laboratory contamination on samples collected from the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1 |
_version_ | 1783443859008651264 |
---|---|
author | Drengenes, Christine Wiker, Harald G. Kalananthan, Tharmini Nordeide, Eli Eagan, Tomas M. L. Nielsen, Rune |
author_facet | Drengenes, Christine Wiker, Harald G. Kalananthan, Tharmini Nordeide, Eli Eagan, Tomas M. L. Nielsen, Rune |
author_sort | Drengenes, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The low bacterial load in samples acquired from the lungs, have made studies on the airway microbiome vulnerable to contamination from bacterial DNA introduced during sampling and laboratory processing. We have examined the impact of laboratory contamination on samples collected from the lower airways by protected (through a sterile catheter) bronchoscopy and explored various in silico approaches to dealing with the contamination post-sequencing. Our analyses included quantitative PCR and targeted amplicon sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. RESULTS: The mean bacterial load varied by sample type for the 23 study subjects (oral wash>1st fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage>protected specimen brush>2nd fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage; p < 0.001). By comparison to a dilution series of know bacterial composition and load, an estimated 10–50% of the bacterial community profiles for lower airway samples could be traced back to contaminating bacterial DNA introduced from the laboratory. We determined the main source of laboratory contaminants to be the DNA extraction kit (FastDNA Spin Kit). The removal of contaminants identified using tools within the Decontam R package appeared to provide a balance between keeping and removing taxa found in both negative controls and study samples. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of laboratory contamination will vary across airway microbiome studies. By reporting estimates of contaminant levels and taking use of contaminant identification tools (e.g. the Decontam R package) based on statistical models that limit the subjectivity of the researcher, the accuracy of inter-study comparisons can be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6694601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66946012019-08-19 Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies Drengenes, Christine Wiker, Harald G. Kalananthan, Tharmini Nordeide, Eli Eagan, Tomas M. L. Nielsen, Rune BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The low bacterial load in samples acquired from the lungs, have made studies on the airway microbiome vulnerable to contamination from bacterial DNA introduced during sampling and laboratory processing. We have examined the impact of laboratory contamination on samples collected from the lower airways by protected (through a sterile catheter) bronchoscopy and explored various in silico approaches to dealing with the contamination post-sequencing. Our analyses included quantitative PCR and targeted amplicon sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. RESULTS: The mean bacterial load varied by sample type for the 23 study subjects (oral wash>1st fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage>protected specimen brush>2nd fraction of protected bronchoalveolar lavage; p < 0.001). By comparison to a dilution series of know bacterial composition and load, an estimated 10–50% of the bacterial community profiles for lower airway samples could be traced back to contaminating bacterial DNA introduced from the laboratory. We determined the main source of laboratory contaminants to be the DNA extraction kit (FastDNA Spin Kit). The removal of contaminants identified using tools within the Decontam R package appeared to provide a balance between keeping and removing taxa found in both negative controls and study samples. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of laboratory contamination will vary across airway microbiome studies. By reporting estimates of contaminant levels and taking use of contaminant identification tools (e.g. the Decontam R package) based on statistical models that limit the subjectivity of the researcher, the accuracy of inter-study comparisons can be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6694601/ /pubmed/31412780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Drengenes, Christine Wiker, Harald G. Kalananthan, Tharmini Nordeide, Eli Eagan, Tomas M. L. Nielsen, Rune Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies |
title | Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies |
title_full | Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies |
title_fullStr | Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies |
title_short | Laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies |
title_sort | laboratory contamination in airway microbiome studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1560-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drengeneschristine laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies AT wikerharaldg laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies AT kalananthantharmini laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies AT nordeideeli laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies AT eagantomasml laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies AT nielsenrune laboratorycontaminationinairwaymicrobiomestudies |