Cargando…

Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines

Most cancer peptide vaccinations tested so far are capable of eliciting a strong immune response, but demonstrate poor clinical benefits. Since peptide vaccination is safe and well-tolerated, and several indications suggest that it has clear potential advantages over other modalities of treatment, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rahat, Michal A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01924
_version_ 1783443907780018176
author Rahat, Michal A.
author_facet Rahat, Michal A.
author_sort Rahat, Michal A.
collection PubMed
description Most cancer peptide vaccinations tested so far are capable of eliciting a strong immune response, but demonstrate poor clinical benefits. Since peptide vaccination is safe and well-tolerated, and several indications suggest that it has clear potential advantages over other modalities of treatment, it is important to investigate the reasons for these clinical failures. In this review, the current state of the art in targeting angiogenic proteins via peptide vaccines is presented, and the underlying reasons for both the successes and the failures are analyzed. The review highlights a number of areas critical for future success, including choice of target antigens, types of peptides used, delivery methods and use of proper adjuvants, and suggests ways to achieve better clinical results in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6694838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66948382019-08-22 Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines Rahat, Michal A. Front Immunol Immunology Most cancer peptide vaccinations tested so far are capable of eliciting a strong immune response, but demonstrate poor clinical benefits. Since peptide vaccination is safe and well-tolerated, and several indications suggest that it has clear potential advantages over other modalities of treatment, it is important to investigate the reasons for these clinical failures. In this review, the current state of the art in targeting angiogenic proteins via peptide vaccines is presented, and the underlying reasons for both the successes and the failures are analyzed. The review highlights a number of areas critical for future success, including choice of target antigens, types of peptides used, delivery methods and use of proper adjuvants, and suggests ways to achieve better clinical results in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6694838/ /pubmed/31440262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01924 Text en Copyright © 2019 Rahat. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Rahat, Michal A.
Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines
title Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines
title_full Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines
title_fullStr Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines
title_full_unstemmed Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines
title_short Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines
title_sort targeting angiogenesis with peptide vaccines
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6694838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01924
work_keys_str_mv AT rahatmichala targetingangiogenesiswithpeptidevaccines